Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y). The linear mapping uk of Lp(X) into Lq′(Y) is compact.
Suppose first that k is such that k∘∈K(Y;Lp′(X)), and denote by A the support of k∘. Let F be the subspace of K(Y,A;Lp′(X,μ)) generated by the functions y↦f2(y)f1, where f2∈K(Y,A) and f1∈Lp′(X). When m∈K(Y;Lp′(X)) satisfies m∘∈F, the linear mapping um is of finite rank, therefore compact. For m1 and m2 in K(Y,A;Lp′(X)), one has moreover
∫′1/q′
∥um1−um2∥⩽∥m1−m2∥p′,q′=(Y∥m1,y−m2,y∥p′qdν(y))
⩽ν(A)1/q′ supy∈YNp′(m1,y−m2,y).
Since the space F is dense in K(Y,A;Lp′(X)) for the topology of uniform convergence in A (INT, III, p. 41, § 1, no1, prop. 1 and INT, III, p. 46, § 1, no2, prop. 5), it follows that the linear mapping uk is the limit of a sequence of linear mappings of finite rank. It is therefore compact (cor. 1 of III, p. 4).
Consider the general case. Let k∈Lp′,q′(X,Y). For every ε>0, there exists a mapping kε,∘∈K(Y;Lp′(X)) such that
∥k∘−kε,∘∥q′<ε
The corresponding function kε:X×Y→C then satisfies
∥uk−ukε∥⩽∥k−kε∥p,q⩽Np′,q′(k−kε)=∥k∘−kε,∘∥q′<ε
Since ukε is compact by what precedes, the mapping uk is likewise compact (prop. 2 of III, p. 4).
Put p=1 and suppose q>1. There may exist mappings k:X×Y→C such that ky∈L∞(X) for every y∈Y, and such that the integral
∫Y∗∥ky∥∞q′dν(y)
is finite (in particular, condition (2) of III, p. 27 is valid), but such that the linear mapping uk from L1(X) into Lq′(X) is not compact (exercise 2 of III, p. 119).
In particular, one deduces from the proposition the following corollary:
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.