Bourbaki

Lemma 3

Tag 02WZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02WZ].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 1. Opérateurs compacts sur un espace hilbertien

Let F be a Hilbert space and u∈L(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}(E; F). Let n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}.

a) One has (∧^nu)∗=∧^n(u∗)(\widehat{\wedge}^nu)^*=\widehat{\wedge}^n(u^*);

b) If F = E and uu is hermitian (resp. positive, normal, unitary), then ∧^nu\widehat{\wedge}^nu is hermitian (resp. positive, normal, unitary) ;

c) One has ∣∧^nu∣=∧^n∣u∣|\widehat{\wedge}^nu|=\widehat{\wedge}^n|u|;

d) Let H be a closed subspace of E. The restriction (∧^nu)∣∧^nH(\widehat{\wedge}^nu)|\widehat{\wedge}^nH of ∧^nu\widehat{\wedge}^nu to ∧^nH\widehat{\wedge}^nH is equal to ∧^n(u∣H)(\widehat{\wedge}^n(u|H) (equality in L(∧^nH;∧^nF))\mathscr{L}(\widehat{\wedge}^nH;\widehat{\wedge}^nF));

e) Suppose F = E. Let H be a closed subspace of E. One has (∧^nu)∧^nH=∧^n(uH)(\widehat{\wedge}^nu)_{\widehat{\wedge}^nH}=\widehat{\wedge}^n(u_H) in L(∧^nH)\mathscr{L}(\widehat{\wedge}^nH).

Assertion a) results from EVT, V, p. 39, formula (13). It implies at once that ∧^nu\widehat{\wedge}^nu is hermitian (resp. unitary) when uu is hermitian (resp. unitary). If uu is positive, then u1/2u^{1/2} is hermitian, hence so is ∧^n(u1/2)\widehat{\wedge}^n(u^{1/2}); the relation ∧^nu=(∧^nu1/2)2\widehat{\wedge}^nu=(\widehat{\wedge}^nu^{1/2})^2 implies that ∧^nu\widehat{\wedge}^nu is positive (I, p. 138, prop. 8). This proves b).

The foregoing makes it possible to calculate that

(∧^n∣u∣)2=∧^n(∣u∣2)=∧^n(u∗u) (\widehat{\wedge}^n|u|)^2=\widehat{\wedge}^n(|u|^2) =\widehat{\wedge}^n(u^*u)
=∧^nu∗∧^nu=(∧^nu)∗(∧^nu)=∣∧^nu∣2 =\widehat{\wedge}^nu^*\widehat{\wedge}^nu=(\widehat{\wedge}^nu)^*(\widehat{\wedge}^nu) =|\widehat{\wedge}^nu|^2

Since ∧^n∣u∣\widehat{\wedge}^n|u| is positive by b), it follows from prop. 16 of I, p. 118 that ∧^n∣u∣=∣∧^nu∣\widehat{\wedge}^n|u|=|\widehat{\wedge}^nu|, whence c).

Let iHi_H be the canonical injection of H into E. The space ∧^nH\widehat{\wedge}^nH is identified with a closed subspace of ∧^nE\widehat{\wedge}^nE by the mapping ∧^niH\widehat{\wedge}^ni_H, whence

(∧^nu)∣∧^nH=∧^nu∘∧^niH=∧^n(u∘iH)=∧^n(u∣H) (\widehat{\wedge}^nu)|\widehat{\wedge}^nH =\widehat{\wedge}^nu\circ \widehat{\wedge}^ni_H=\widehat{\wedge}^n(u\circ i_H) =\widehat{\wedge}^n(u|H)

and

(∧^nu)∧^nH=(∧^niH)∗∘∧^nu∘∧^niH=∧^n(iH∗uiH)=∧^n(uH) (\widehat{\wedge}^nu)_{\widehat{\wedge}^nH}= (\widehat{\wedge}^ni_H)^*\circ \widehat{\wedge}^nu\circ \widehat{\wedge}^ni_H=\widehat{\wedge}^n(i^*_Hui_H) =\widehat{\wedge}^n(u_H)

which proves d) and e).

Let F be a Hilbert space, and let u∈Lc(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}^c(E; F). As in IV, p. 151, we denote by IEI_E the set of dimensions of finite-dimensional subspaces F of E such that F≠EF\not = E. Recall that (αn(u))n∈IE(\alpha_n(u))_{n\in I_E} denotes the extended sequence of singular values of uu (def. 3 of IV, p. 156).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.