b) If F = E and u is hermitian (resp. positive, normal, unitary), then ∧nu is hermitian (resp. positive, normal, unitary) ;
c) One has ∣∧nu∣=∧n∣u∣;
d) Let H be a closed subspace of E. The restriction (∧nu)∣∧nH of ∧nu to ∧nH is equal to ∧n(u∣H)(equality in L(∧nH;∧nF));
e) Suppose F = E. Let H be a closed subspace of E. One has (∧nu)∧nH=∧n(uH) in L(∧nH).
Assertion a) results from EVT, V, p. 39, formula (13). It implies at once that ∧nu is hermitian (resp. unitary) when u is hermitian (resp. unitary). If u is positive, then u1/2 is hermitian, hence so is ∧n(u1/2); the relation ∧nu=(∧nu1/2)2 implies that ∧nu is positive (I, p. 138, prop. 8). This proves b).
The foregoing makes it possible to calculate that
(∧n∣u∣)2=∧n(∣u∣2)=∧n(u∗u)
=∧nu∗∧nu=(∧nu)∗(∧nu)=∣∧nu∣2
Since ∧n∣u∣ is positive by b), it follows from prop. 16 of I, p. 118 that ∧n∣u∣=∣∧nu∣, whence c).
Let iH be the canonical injection of H into E. The space ∧nH is identified with a closed subspace of ∧nE by the mapping ∧niH, whence
(∧nu)∣∧nH=∧nu∘∧niH=∧n(u∘iH)=∧n(u∣H)
and
(∧nu)∧nH=(∧niH)∗∘∧nu∘∧niH=∧n(iH∗uiH)=∧n(uH)
which proves d) and e).
Let F be a Hilbert space, and let u∈Lc(E;F). As in IV, p. 151, we denote by IE the set of dimensions of finite-dimensional subspaces F of E such that F=E. Recall that (αn(u))n∈IE denotes the extended sequence of singular values of u (def. 3 of IV, p. 156).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.