Bourbaki

Proposition 14

Tag 02XE, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02XE].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 1. Opérateurs compacts sur un espace hilbertien

Let u∈L2(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}_2(E; F). Then

∥u∥1=\|u\|_1= supv∈L2(E;F)∣⟨v∣u⟩∣_{v\in\mathscr{L}_2(E;F)}|\langle v|u\rangle |,

∥v∥⩽1\|v\|\leqslant 1

the least upper bound being taken in R+∪{+∞}\mathbf{R}_+\cup \{+\infty \}.

Let B=(ei)i∈IB = (e_i)_{i\in I} be an orthonormal basis of the initial space Ker(uu)∘^{\circ} of u,C=(fi)i∈Iu, C = (f_i)_{i\in I} an orthonormal family in F and (αi)i∈I(\alpha_i)_{i\in I} a family in (R+∗)I(\mathbf{R}^*_+)^I such that u(ei)=αifiu(e_i) =\alpha_if_i for every i∈Ii\in I (Cor. 2 of IV, p. 150). The family (αi)i∈I(\alpha_i)_{i\in I} is square-summable since uu belongs to L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F) (Cor. 4 of IV, p. 165). Let (ej)j∈J(e_j)_{j\in J} be an orthonormal basis of E extending (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i\in I}.

Let L be a finite subset of I. Let vLv_L be the continuous finite-rank linear mapping of E into F defined by

vL(x)=∑i∈L⟨ei∣x⟩fi v_L(x) =\sum_{i\in L}\langle e_i|x\rangle f_i

for every xx in E. We have ∥vL∥⩽1\|v_L\|\leqslant 1 and vL∈L2(E;F)v_L\in \mathscr{L}_2(E; F). Moreover, for every j∈Jj\in J, we have vL(ej)=0v_L(e_j) = 0 if j∉Lj \notin L and vL(ej)=fjv_L(e_j) =f_j if j∈Lj\in L. Thus

∣⟨vL∣u⟩∣=∣|\langle v_L|u\rangle |=|Tr(vL∗uv^*_Lu)∣=∣∑j∈J⟨vL(ej)∣u(ej)⟩∣=∑j∈Lαj|=|\sum_{j\in J}\langle v_L(e_j)|u(e_j)\rangle |=\sum_{j\in L}\alpha_j.

From loc. cit. we deduce that

(10) ∥u∥1=\|u\|_1= supL∑j∈Lαj⩽_L\sum_{j\in L}\alpha_j\leqslant supv∈∥Lv2∥(E;F)⩽1∣⟨v∣u⟩∣_{v\in\|\mathscr{L}v^2\|(E;F)\leqslant 1}|\langle v|u\rangle |

in R+∪{+∞}\mathbf{R}_+\cup \{+\infty \}.

This implies the equality of the proposition when ∥u∥1=+∞\|u\|_1= +\infty.

Suppose that ∥u∥1\|u\|_1 is finite. For every i∈Ii\in I, let pip_i be the linear mapping of E into F such that pi(ei)=fip_i(e_i) =f_i and pi(x)=0p_i(x) = 0 for every x∈ei∘x\in e^{\circ}_i. For all jj and kk in I, one has

⟨pj∣pk⟩=\langle p_j|p_k\rangle = Tr(pj∗pkp^*_jp_k) =∑i∈J⟨pj(ei)∣pk(ei)⟩=\sum_{i\in J}\langle p_j(e_i)|p_k(e_i)\rangle,

which is zero unless j=kj=k, in which case this quantity is ∥fk∥2=1\|f_k\|^2= 1. The family (pi)i∈I(p_i)_{i\in I} is therefore orthonormal in L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F). Consequently, the family (αipi)i∈I(\alpha_ip_i)_{i\in I} is summable in L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F); its sum is equal to uu since these two continuous linear mappings coincide on the elements eie_i for every i∈Ji\in J.

Let v∈L2(E;F)v\in \mathscr{L}_2(E; F). For every i∈Ii\in I, one has

⟨v∣pi⟩=\langle v|p_i\rangle = Tr(v∗piv^*p_i) =∑j∈J⟨v(ej)∣pi(ej)⟩=⟨v(ei)∣fi⟩=\sum_{j\in J}\langle v(e_j)|p_i(e_j)\rangle =\langle v(e_i)|f_i\rangle.

If ∥v∥⩽1\|v\|\leqslant 1, one then obtains the estimate

∣⟨v∣u⟩∣=∣⟨v∣∑i∈Iαipi⟩∣⩽∑i∈Iαi∣⟨v∣pi⟩∣ |\langle v|u\rangle |=|\langle v|\sum_{i\in I}\alpha_ip_i\rangle |\leqslant \sum_{i\in I}\alpha_i|\langle v|p_i\rangle |

=∑i∈Iαi∣⟨v(ei)∣fi⟩∣⩽∑i∈Iαi==\sum_{i\in I}\alpha_i|\langle v(e_i)|f_i\rangle |\leqslant \sum_{i\in I}\alpha_i= Tr(∣u∣|u|),

whence the inequality

supv∈∥Lv2∥(E;F)⩽1∣⟨v∣u⟩∣⩽∥u∥1_{v\in\|\mathscr{L}v^2\|(E;F)\leqslant 1}|\langle v|u\rangle |\leqslant \|u\|_1,

which, combined with formula (10), completes the proof of the proposition.

It follows from this proposition that the set L1(E;F)\mathscr{L}_1(E; F) of continuous linear mappings uu of E into F such that ∥u∥1\|u\|_1 is finite is a vector subspace of L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F) and that the mapping u↦∥u∥1u\mapsto \|u\|_1 is a semi-norm on L1(E;F)\mathscr{L}_1(E; F); inequality (9) shows that it is a norm.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.