Let E1 and F1 be Hilbert spaces. Let u be in L1(E;F),v be in L(E1;E) and v2 be in L(F;F1). Then v2uv1∈L1(E1;F1) and ∥v2uv1∥1⩽∥v2∥∥v1∥∥u∥1.
Let w∈L2(E;F1) such that ∥w∥⩽1. One has v2u∈L2(E;F1) (EVT, V, p. 52, formula (36)). Since v2∗w∈L2(E;F)(loc. cit.), it follows that
∣⟨w∣v2u⟩∣=∣⟨v2∗w∣u⟩∣⩽∥v2∥∥u∥1
(formula (11)), whence v2u∈L1(E;F1) and ∥v2u∥1⩽∥v2∥∥u∥1 (Prop. 14).
Let v1∈L(E1;E); since uv1=(v1∗u∗)∗, one has uv1∈L1(E1;F) and ∥uv1∥1⩽∥v1∗∥∥u∗∥1=∥v1∥∥u∥1 (Lemma 8).
The proposition follows at once from these inequalities.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.