Bourbaki

Lemma 9

Tag 02XO, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 02XO].

Théories spectrales, chapter IV, § 1. Opérateurs compacts sur un espace hilbertien

Let u∈L1(E;F)u\in \mathscr{L}_1(E; F). We have

∥u∥1=\|u\|_1= supv∈Lc(F;E)∣b(u,v)∣_{v\in\mathscr{L}_c(F;E)}|b(u, v)|.

∥v∥⩽1\|v\|\leqslant 1

Since every Hilbert-Schmidt mapping is compact (cor. 2 of IV, p. 165), we have

∥u∥1⩽\|u\|_1\leqslant supv∈∥Lv∥c(E;F)⩽1∣_{v\in\|\mathscr{L}v\|^c(E;F)\leqslant 1}|Tr(vuvu)∣=|= supv∈L∥vc∥(F;E)⩽1∣b(u,v)∣_{v\in\mathscr{L}\|v^c\|(F;E)\leqslant 1}|b(u, v)|

by prop. 14.

Let v∈Lc(E;F)v\in \mathscr{L}^c(E; F) be of norm ⩽\leqslant 1. Since L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F) is dense in Lc(E;F)\mathscr{L}^c(E; F), there exists a sequence (vn)n∈N(v_n)_{n\in\mathbf{N}} in L2(E;F)\mathscr{L}_2(E; F) which converges to vv in L(E;F)\mathscr{L}(E; F). The sequence (b(u,vn))n∈N(b(u, v_n))_{n\in\mathbf{N}} converges to b(u,v)b(u, v); since ∣b(u,vn)∣|b(u, v_n)| = ∣|Tr(vnuv_nu)∣| = ∣⟨vn∗∣u⟩∣⩽∥u∥1|\langle v_n^*|u\rangle |\leqslant \|u\|_1 (prop. 14) for every n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, it follows that ∣b(u,v)∣⩽∥u∥1|b(u, v)|\leqslant \|u\|_1.

Let us denote by θ\theta the continuous linear mapping

θ:L1(E;F)→Lc(F;E)′ \theta :\mathscr{L}_1(E; F)\rightarrow \mathscr{L}^c(F; E)'

such that θ(u)(v)=b(u,v)\theta (u)(v) =b(u, v).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5-6-mini, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5.4, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.