Let φ∈ Pos1(G) and let (ϱ,x) be a cyclic Hilbertian realization of φ. Then ϱ is an irreducible representation of G if and only if φ is an extreme point (EVT, II, p. 57, def. 1) of Pos1(G).
Let E be the space of ϱ. Suppose first that ϱ is not irreducible. Let F be a nonzero closed subspace of E, stable under ϱ, and different from E. Let us write x=x1+x2, where x1∈F and x2∈F∘. Then one has 1=∥x∥2=∥x1∥2+∥x2∥2. The subrepresentation of E generated by x1 is contained in F, hence x1=x since x is a cyclic vector of ϱ, whence x2=0. Analogously one verifies that x1=0.
For j=1 and j=2, let us denote by φj the continuous function on G such that
φj(g)=∥xj∥21⟨xj∣ϱ(g)xj⟩
for all g∈G. One has φj∈ Pos1(G)(V, p. 443, example). Since φ=∥x1∥2φ1+∥x2∥2φ2, it is enough to verify that φ1=φ2 in order to prove that φ is not an extreme point of Pos1(G); for this it is enough to prove that φ=φ1.
Arguing by contradiction, suppose that φ=φ1. Since one has ⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x2⟩=0 for all g∈G, it would follow that
∥x1∥21⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x⟩=∥x1∥21⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x1⟩=φ1(g)=φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩
for all g∈G, whence ⟨x1∣y⟩=⟨∥x1∥2x∣y⟩ for every element y of the vector subspace of E generated by the elements ϱ(g)x for g∈G, hence for all y∈E since x is a cyclic vector of ϱ. This would imply that x1=∥x1∥2x is also a cyclic vector of ϱ, which is a contradiction, whence the assertion.
Now suppose that ϱ is irreducible, and prove that φ is an extreme point of Pos1(G). Let φ1=φ2 be elements of Pos1(G) and let t1,t2∈[0,1] be such that t1+t2=1 and φ=t1φ1+t2φ2. For j∈{1,2}, let (ϱj,xj) denote a cyclic Hilbert realization of φj, and let Ej denote the space of ϱj. Let x3=t11/2x1+t21/2x2. Then (ϱ1⊕ϱ2,x3) is a Hilbert realization of φ. Since (ϱ,x) is cyclic, there exists an isometric G-morphism u:E→E1⊕E2 such that u(x)=x3 (Prop. 10).
Let j=1 or j=2. Since ϱ is irreducible, there exists λj⩾0 such that the G-morphism uj= prj∘u of E into Ej satisfies
⟨uj(y)∣uj(y′)⟩=λj⟨y∣y′⟩
for all y and y′ in E (Cor. 5 of V, p. 388, if uj=0, and one may take λj=0 otherwise). For all g∈G, one has
tjφj(g)=⟨tj1/2xj∣ϱj(g)(tj1/2xj)⟩=⟨uj(x)∣ϱj(g)(uj(x))⟩
=⟨uj(x)∣uj(ϱ(g)x)⟩=λjφ(g)
Since φj(e)=φ(e)=1, it follows that φj=φ if tj=0. The assumption φ1=φ2 therefore implies that t1 or t2 must be zero, which proves that φ is an extreme point of Pos1(G).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.