Bourbaki

§ 3. Functions of positive type

In this paragraph, all vector spaces, as well as all Hilbert spaces and algebras considered, are over C\mathbf{C}, unless the contrary is stated.

1. Universally positive kernels

In this number, X is a separated topological space.

Theorem 1 03BX

Let f∈C(X×X)f\in \mathscr{C}(X\times X). The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) For every compact subset Y of X and every positive measure μ\mu on Y, the endomorphism of L2(Y,μ)L^2(Y, \mu) defined by the kernel f∣(Y×Y)f|(Y\times Y) (Def. 1 of III, p. 29) is positive; in other words, one has

∫Y×Yh(x)‾h(y)f(x,y)d(μ⊗μ)(x,y)⩾0 \int_{Y\times Y}\overline{h(x)}h(y)f(x, y)d(\mu\otimes \mu)(x, y)\geqslant 0

for every h∈L2(Y,μ)h\in \mathscr{L}^2(Y, \mu);

(ii) For every integer n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, every family (xi)0⩽i⩽n(x_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} in X and every family (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} of complex numbers, one has

∑i=0n∑j=0nt‾itjf(xi,xj)⩾0 \sum_{i=0}^n\sum_{j=0}^n\overline{t}_it_jf(x_i, x_j)\geqslant 0

(iii) There exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→Eg: X\rightarrow E with total image such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩f(x, y) =\langle g(x)|g(y)\rangle for all xx and yy in X;

(iv) There exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→Eg: X\rightarrow E such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩f(x, y) =\langle g(x)|g(y)\rangle for all xx and yy in X.

It is apparent that (iii) implies (iv), and one sees that (i) implies (ii) by considering the discrete measure μ\mu which is the image of the counting measure on {0,...,n}\{0, . . . , n\} under the mapping i↦xii\mapsto x_i and the function hh such that

h(x)=∑0⩽i⩽nti h(x) =\sum_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n}t_i
xi=xx_i=x

Let us prove that (iv) implies (i). Suppose that there exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→Eg: X\rightarrow E such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩f(x, y) =\langle g(x)|g(y)\rangle for every (x,y)∈X×X(x, y)\in X\times X. Let Y be a compact subset of X,μX,\mu a positive measure on Y and h∈L2(Y,μ)h\in \mathscr{L}^2(Y, \mu). One has

∫Y×Yh(x)‾h(y)f(x,y)d(μ⊗μ)(x,y) \int_{Y\times Y}\overline{h(x)}h(y)f(x, y)d(\mu\otimes \mu)(x, y)
=∫Y×Yh(x)‾h(y)⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩d(μ⊗μ)(x,y) =\int_{Y\times Y}\overline{h(x)}h(y)\langle g(x)|g(y)\rangle d(\mu\otimes \mu)(x, y)
=⟨∫Yh(x)g(x)dμ(x)∣∫Yh(y)g(y)dμ(y)⟩⩾0 =\langle\int_Yh(x)g(x)d\mu(x)|\int_Yh(y)g(y)d\mu(y)\rangle\geqslant 0

by INT, V, p. 97, § 8, noo4^o4, Prop. 9.

Finally, let us prove that (ii) implies (iii). Let E~\widetilde{E} be the space of complex measures with finite support on X. For μ1\mu_1 and μ2\mu_2 in E~\widetilde{E}, put

⟨μ1∣μ2⟩=∫X×Xf(x,y)(μ‾1⊗μ2)(x,y) \langle \mu_1|\mu_2\rangle =\int_{X\times X}f(x, y) (\overline{\mu}_1\otimes \mu_2)(x, y)

The sesquilinear form resulting on E~\widetilde{E} is a positive Hermitian form. In fact, let μ∈E~\mu\in \widetilde{E}; there exist a finite family (xi)0⩽i⩽n(x_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} in X and complex numbers (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} such that μ=∑i=0ntiεxi\mu=\sum^n_{i=0}t_i\varepsilon_{x_i}. One then has

⟨μ∣μ⟩=∑i=0n∑j=0nt‾itjf(xi,xj)⩾0 \langle \mu|\mu\rangle =\sum_{i=0}^n\sum_{j=0}^n\overline{t}_it_jf(x_i, x_j)\geqslant 0

by hypothesis. Define g~:X→E~\widetilde{g}: X\rightarrow \widetilde{E} by g~(x)=εx\widetilde{g}(x) =\varepsilon_x. The image of the mapping g~\widetilde{g} generates E~\widetilde{E}. Moreover, for every (x,y)∈X×X(x, y)\in X\times X, one has on the one hand f(x,y)=⟨g~(x)∣g~(y)⟩f(x, y) =\langle \widetilde{g}(x)|\widetilde{g}(y)\rangle and on the other hand

∥g~(x)−g~(y)∥2=f(x,x)+f(y,y)−f(x,y)−f(y,x) \|\widetilde{g}(x)-\widetilde{g}(y)\|^2=f(x, x) +f(y, y)-f(x, y)-f(y, x)

which implies that g~\widetilde{g} is continuous since ff is continuous.

Let E be the separated-completed Hilbert space of E~\widetilde{E} (EVT, V, p. 8, cor. of the prop. 4) and g:X→Eg: X\rightarrow E the composition of g~\widetilde{g} and of the canonical mapping E~→E\widetilde{E}\rightarrow E. Then the mapping gg is continuous, its image is total in E, and one has f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩f(x, y) =\langle g(x)|g(y)\rangle for all (x,y)∈X×X(x, y)\in X\times X.

The method used to prove that (ii) implies (iii) is called the Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction.

Definition 1 03BY

A function f∈C(X×X)f\in \mathscr{C}(X\times X) is said to be a universally positive kernel on X if it satisfies the equivalent conditions of Theorem 1.

If ff is a universally positive kernel on X, a pair (E,g)(E, g) satisfying condition (iv) of loc. cit. is called a Hilbert realization of ff; if condition (iii) is satisfied, it is said to be a cyclic Hilbert realization.

We denote by Noy+(X)_+(X) the set of universally positive kernels on X.

Let X′X' be a separated topological space and h:X→X′h: X\rightarrow X' a continuous mapping. The mapping f↦f∘(h,h)f\mapsto f\circ (h, h) from C(X′×X′)\mathscr{C}(X'\times X') into C(X×X)\mathscr{C}(X\times X) induces, by passing to the subspaces, a mapping Noy+(X′)→_+(X')\rightarrow Noy+(X)_+(X).

Proposition 1 03BZ

Let ff be a universally positive kernel on X. Let (E1,g1)(E_1, g_1) and (E2,g2)(E_2, g_2) be Hilbert realizations of ff. Suppose that (E1,g1)(E_1, g_1) is a cyclic Hilbert realization. There then exists a unique continuous linear mapping u:E1→E2u: E_1\rightarrow E_2 such that g2=u∘g1g_2=u\circ g_1. This mapping is isometric. If (E2,g2)(E_2, g_2) is also cyclic, then uu is an isomorphism.

The uniqueness of uu results from the fact that the image of g1g_1 is total in E1E_1. Let F=C(X)F =\mathbf{C}^{(X)} and let (ex)x∈X(e_x)_{x\in X} be the canonical basis of F. For j=1j= 1 and j=2j= 2, denote by uju_j the linear mapping from F into EjE_j determined by uj(ex)=gj(x)u_j(e_x) =g_j(x), and denote by FjF_j its image; the space F1F_1 is dense in E1E_1.

Let t=∑txext=\sum t_xe_x be an element of F. One has

∥u1(t)∥2=∑x,yt‾xty⟨g1(x)∣g1(y)⟩=∑x,yt‾xtyf(x,y) \|u_1(t)\|^2=\sum_{x,y}\overline{t}_xt_y\langle g_1(x)|g_1(y)\rangle =\sum_{x,y}\overline{t}_xt_yf(x, y)
=∑x,yt‾xty⟨g2(x)∣g2(y)⟩=∥u2(t)∥2 =\sum_{x,y}\overline{t}_xt_y\langle g_2(x)|g_2(y)\rangle =\|u_2(t)\|^2

Consequently, there exists an isometric linear mapping vv from F1F_1 into F2F_2 such that u2=v∘u1u_2=v\circ u_1, and in particular g2(x)=v(g1(x))g_2(x) =v(g_1(x)) for all x∈Xx\in X. Since the image of g1g_1 is total in E1E_1, this mapping extends to an isometric linear mapping uu from E1E_1 into E2E_2 such that g2=u∘g1g_2=u\circ g_1.

By Lemma 8 of I, p. 107, the image of uu is closed in E2E_2. If (E2,g2)(E_2, g_2) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization, the image of uu is also dense in E2E_2 and uu is therefore an isomorphism.

Proposition 2 03C0

The set Noy+(X)_+(X) is a self-adjoint cone in the space C(X×X)\mathscr{C}(X\times X); it is stable under product and it is closed when C(X×X)\mathscr{C}(X\times X) is endowed with the topology of simple convergence.

real numberIt is elementary that ift⩾0t\geqslant 0, and that ff∈∈\frac{f}{f}\in \in NoyNoy++(X)_{++}(X).(X), then tf∈tf\in Noy+(X)_+(X) for every

If (E1,g1)(E_1, g_1) and (E2,g2)(E_2, g_2) are Hilbertian realizations of universally positive kernels f1f_1 and f2f_2 on X, then the pair (E1⊕E2,g1+g2)(E_1\oplus E_2, g_1+g_2) (resp. the pair (E1⊗^2E2,g1⊗g2)(E_1\widehat{\otimes}_2E_2, g_1\otimes g_2)) is a Hilbertian realization of f1+f2f_1+f_2 (resp. of f1f2f_1f_2); these are therefore universally positive kernels.

Characterization (ii) of Noy+(X)_+(X) (Theorem 1) implies that this set is closed in C(X×X)\mathscr{C}(X\times X) endowed with the topology of simple convergence.

2. Supplement on the holomorphic functional calculus

For every subset X of C\mathbf{C}, X∗X^* denotes the image of X under complex conjugation. Let U be an open subset of C\mathbf{C} and g:U→Cg: U\rightarrow \mathbf{C} a holomorphic function. The function f∗:z↦g(z‾)f^*:z\mapsto g(\overline{z}) is then defined and holomorphic on U∗U^*. The mapping f↦f∗f\mapsto f^* is a continuous bijection of O(U)\mathscr{O}(U) onto O(U∗)\mathscr{O}(U^*) such that (f1f2)∗=f1∗f2∗(f_1f_2)^*=f_1^*f_2^* and (f1+f2)∗=f1∗+f2∗(f_1+f_2)^*=f_1^*+f_2^* for f1f_1 and f2f_2 in O(U)\mathscr{O}(U).

Let C be a compact subset of C\mathbf{C}. The mappings f↦f∗f\mapsto f^* of O(U)\mathscr{O}(U) into O(U∗)\mathscr{O}(U^*), for U ranging over the open subsets of C\mathbf{C} containing C, induce a continuous bijection of the space O(C)\mathscr{O}(C) onto O(C∗)\mathscr{O}(C^*)(I, p. 49, no1^o1), which is also denoted by f↦f∗f\mapsto f^* and which satisfies (f1f2)∗=f1∗f2∗(f_1f_2)^*=f_1^*f_2^* and (f1+f2)∗=f1∗+f2∗(f_1+f_2)^*=f_1^*+f_2^* for f1f_1 and f2f_2 in O(C)\mathscr{O}(C).

Proposition 3 03C1

Let A be a unital involutive Banach algebra. Let a∈Aa\in A. The spectrum of a∗a^* is the image SpA(a)∗_A(a)^* of SpA(a)_A(a) under complex conjugation. For every f∈Of\in \mathscr{O}(SpA(a)_A(a)), one has f(a)∗=f∗(a∗)f(a)^*=f^*(a^*).

The first assertion follows from I, p. 97. From what precedes, the mapping φ\varphi of O\mathscr{O}(SpA(a)_A(a)) into A defined by f↦(f∗(a∗))∗f\mapsto (f^*(a^*))^* is a continuous unital morphism of O\mathscr{O}(SpA(a)_A(a)) into A such that the image of the germ in a neighbourhood of SpA(a)_A(a) of the identity function of C\mathbf{C} is equal to aa. Consequently, φ\varphi is the mapping f↦f(a)f\mapsto f(a) of the holomorphic functional calculus (I, p. 74, th. 5).

Lemma 1 03C2

Let D be the open unit disk in C\mathbf{C}. There exists a unique holomorphic function ff defined on D such that f(z)2=1−zf(z)^2= 1-z for every z∈Dz\in D and f(0)=1f(0) = 1. One has f∗=ff^*=f.

The radius of convergence of the power series

+∞(1/2)n ^{+\infty}(1/2)_n
∑(−z) \sum(-z)
n n
n=0n=0

is equal to 1 and its sum ff defines a holomorphic function on D (VAR,

√ \surd

R1, p. 27, 3.2.9) taking the value 1 at 0. It satisfies f(x)=1−xf(x) =1-x for every x∈D∩Rx\in D\cap \mathbf{R} (FVR, III, p. 19), hence f(z)2=1−zf(z)^2= 1-z for z∈Dz\in D since the difference f(z)2−(1−z)f(z)^2-(1-z) is a holomorphic function all of whose successive derivatives vanish at 0 (VAR, R1, p. 27, 3.2.5). By definition, one verifies that f∗=ff^*=f.

Let gg be a holomorphic function on D such that g(z)2=1−zg(z)^2= 1-z for every z∈Dz\in D and such that g(0)=1g(0) = 1. The function gg does not vanish and the continuous function f/gf /g on D takes its values in {−1,1}\{-1,1\}; since D is connected and f(0)=gf(0) =g(0), one has f=gf=g.

3. Positive linear forms

Definition 2 03C3

Let A be an involutive algebra. A linear form λ\lambda on A is said to be positive if λ(a∗a)∈R+\lambda (a^*a)\in \mathbf{R}_+ for every a∈Aa\in A.

If A is an involutive Banach algebra, one denotes by A+′A'_+ the set of continuous positive linear forms on A.

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra. The set A+′A'_+ is a pointed convex cone in the real vector space of C\mathbf{C}-linear forms on A.

Lemma 2 03C4

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra and λ\lambda a positive linear form on A.

a) For all aa and bb in A, one has λ(a∗b)=λ(b∗a)‾\lambda (a^*b) =\overline{\lambda(b^*a)} and

∣λ(a∗b)∣2⩽λ(a∗a)λ(b∗b) |\lambda (a^*b)|^2\leqslant \lambda (a^*a)\lambda (b^*b)

b) If A is unital, then the linear form λ\lambda is continuous and its norm is equal to λ(1)\lambda (1).

The mapping (a,b)↦λ(a∗b)(a, b)\mapsto \lambda (a^*b) is a positive Hermitian form on A; it therefore satisfies λ(a∗b)=λ(b∗a)\lambda (a^*b) =\lambda (b^*a) and ∣λ(a∗b)∣2⩽λ(a∗a)λ(b∗b)|\lambda (a^*b)|^2\leqslant \lambda (a^*a)\lambda (b^*b) for all aa and bb in A (EVT, V, p. 2, remark and p. 3, prop. 2).

Let us prove b). Let a∈Aa\in A be a hermitian element of norm <1<1. The spectral radius of aa is less than ∥a∥\|a\|, hence the spectrum of aa is contained in the open unit disc D of C\mathbf{C} (Theorem 1 of I, p. 24). Let ff be a holomorphic function on D such that f(z)2=1−zf(z)^2= 1-z for all z∈Dz\in D (Lemma 1 of V, p. 435). Applying the holomorphic functional calculus to the element aa and to the function ff, the element b=f(a)b=f(a) satisfies b2=1−a(b^2= 1-a(I, p. 74, Theorem 5). By Prop. 3 of V, p. 435, one moreover has f(a)∗=f∗(a∗)=f(a)f(a)^*=f^*(a^*) =f(a), hence bb is hermitian. We then have λ(1−a)=λ(b∗b)⩾0\lambda (1-a) =\lambda (b^*b)\geqslant 0, whence λ(a)⩽λ(1)\lambda (a)\leqslant \lambda (1).

Now let b∈Ab\in A be of norm <1<1. The element b∗bb^*b is hermitian and ∥b∗b∥<1\|b^*b\|<1, hence applying a) with a=1a= 1, we find

∣λ(b)∣2⩽λ(1)λ(b∗b)⩽λ(1)2 |\lambda (b)|^2\leqslant \lambda (1)\lambda (b^*b)\leqslant \lambda (1)^2

with equality if b=1b= 1. The linear form λ\lambda is therefore continuous, and its norm is equal to λ(1)\lambda (1). Assertion b) is proved.

Example 03C5

Let X be a compact topological space and let A be the star-algebra C(X)\mathscr{C}(X). Positive linear forms on A are identified with positive measures on X (INT, III, p. 52, § 1, no6^o6, Theorem 1).

Lemma 3 03C6

Let A be a unital involutive Banach algebra admitting an approximate unit (I, p. 120, Definition 7). Let λ\lambda be a continuous positive linear form on A.

a) For every aa in A, one has λ(a∗)=λ(a)‾\lambda (a^*) =\overline{\lambda(a)} and ∣λ(a)∣2⩽∥λ∥λ(a∗a)|\lambda (a)|^2\leqslant \|\lambda \|\lambda (a^*a);

b) Let A~\widetilde{A} be the involutive algebra obtained from A by adjunction of a unit element, and let ee be its unit element. There exists a continuous positive linear form λ~\widetilde{\lambda} on A~\widetilde{A} extending λ\lambda and such that λ~(e)=∥λ∥\widetilde{\lambda}(e) =\|\lambda \|;

c) For all aa and bb in A, one has ∣λ(b∗ab)∣⩽∥a∥λ(b∗b)|\lambda (b^*ab)|\leqslant \|a\|\lambda (b^*b).

Let us prove a). Let F\mathfrak{F} be an approximate unit of A. Let a∈Aa\in A. Using Lemma 2, a) and the definition of an approximate unit, one finds

λ(a∗)=\lambda (a^*) = limf,Fλ(fa∗)=_{f,\mathfrak{F}}\lambda (f a^*) = limf,Fλ(af∗)=_{f,\mathfrak{F}}\lambda (af^*) = limf,Fλ((fa∗)∗)=λ(a)‾_{f,\mathfrak{F}}\lambda ((f a^*)^*) =\overline{\lambda(a)},

whence (loc. cit.)

∣λ(a)∣2=|\lambda (a)|^2= limf,F∣λ(fa)∣2⩽λ(a∗a)_{f,\mathfrak{F}}|\lambda (f a)|^2\leqslant \lambda (a^*a) lim supf,Fλ(ff∗)⩽∥λ∥λ(a∗a)_{f,\mathfrak{F}}\lambda (f f^*)\leqslant \|\lambda \|\lambda (a^*a),

since F\mathfrak{F} is a filter on the unit ball of A.

To prove b), one may suppose that λ\lambda is not zero, then that ∥λ∥=1\|\lambda \|= 1. For a∈Aa\in A and z∈Cz\in \mathbf{C}, let us put λ~(a+z⋅e)=λ(a)+z\widetilde{\lambda}(a+z\cdot e) =\lambda (a) +z. The mapping λ~\widetilde{\lambda} is a continuous linear form on A~\widetilde{A} which extends λ\lambda and satisfies λ~(e)=1\widetilde{\lambda}(e) = 1. It is positive: for all a∈Aa\in A and z∈Cz\in \mathbf{C}, by a), we calculate

λ~((a+z⋅e)∗(a+z⋅e))=λ(a∗a)+zλ(a)+zλ(a∗)+∣z∣2 \widetilde{\lambda}((a+z\cdot e)^*(a+z\cdot e)) =\lambda (a^*a) +z\lambda (a) +z\lambda (a^*) +|z|^2
=∣z+λ(a)∣2+λ(a∗a)−∣λ(a)∣2⩾0 =|z+\lambda (a)|^2+\lambda (a^*a)- |\lambda (a)|^2\geqslant 0

Finally, let bb be an element of A. The mapping a↦λ~(b∗ab)a\mapsto \widetilde{\lambda}(b^*ab) is a positive linear form on the unital involutive Banach algebra A~\widetilde{A}. It is therefore continuous of norm equal to its value at ee (Lemma 2, b)), which is equal to λ(b∗b)\lambda (b^*b), whence assertion c).

Proposition 4 03C7

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra.

a) For every Hilbert space E, every morphism of involutive algebras φ:A→L(E)\varphi : A\rightarrow \mathscr{L}(E) and every vector x∈Ex\in E, the linear form defined on A by λ(a)=⟨x∣φ(a)x⟩\lambda (a) =\langle x|\varphi (a)x\rangle is a continuous positive linear form;

b) Let λ∈A+′\lambda \in A'_+. The mapping ff of A×AA\times A into C\mathbf{C} defined by f(a,b)=f(a, b) = λ(a∗b)\lambda (a^*b) for every (a,b)∈A×A(a, b)\in A\times A is a universally positive kernel on A.

Let us prove a). For every a∈Aa\in A, one has

λ(a∗a)=⟨x∣φ(a∗a)x⟩=∥φ(a)x∥2⩾0 \lambda (a^*a) =\langle x|\varphi (a^*a)x\rangle =\|\varphi (a)x\|^2\geqslant 0

therefore λ\lambda is a positive linear form on A; it is continuous since φ\varphi is continuous (Prop. 2 of I, p. 104).

Let us prove b). The function ff is continuous. For every n∈Nn\in \mathbf{N}, every family (ai)0⩽i⩽n(a_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} in A and every family (ti)0⩽i⩽n(t_i)_{0\leqslant i\leqslant n} of complex numbers, one has

∑i=0n∑j=0nt‾itjf(ai,aj)=λ((∑i=0ntiai)∗(∑j=0ntjaj))⩾0 \sum_{i=0}^n\sum_{j=0}^n\overline{t}_it_jf(a_i, a_j) =\lambda ((\sum_{i=0}^nt_ia_i)^*(\sum_{j=0}^nt_ja_j))\geqslant 0

whence the result (Def. 1 of V, p. 433).

Definition 3 03C8

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra. Let λ∈A+′\lambda \in A'_+ be a continuous positive linear form on A. A Hilbertian realization of λ\lambda is by definition a triple (E,x,φ)(E, x, \varphi ) consisting of a Hilbert space E, an element xx of E and a morphism of involutive algebras φ\varphi of A into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E), such that λ(b∗a)=⟨φ(b)x∣φ(a)x⟩\lambda (b^*a) =\langle \varphi (b)x|\varphi (a)x\rangle for every (a,b)∈A2(a, b)\in A^2.

If the set of elements φ(a)x\varphi (a)x for a∈Aa\in A is total in E, one says that (E,x,φ)(E, x, \varphi ) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization of λ\lambda.

Proposition 5 03C9

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra admitting an approximate unit. Every continuous positive linear form on A admits a cyclic Hilbertian realization (E,x,φ)(E, x, \varphi ). If A is unital, then there exists such a realization in which the morphism φ\varphi is unital.

One may suppose that A is a unital algebra (Lemma 3, b)).

Let λ\lambda be a continuous positive linear form on A. Let (E,g)(E, g) be a cyclic Hilbertian realization of the universally positive kernel ff on A defined by f(a,b)=λ(a∗b)f(a, b) =\lambda (a^*b) (Prop. 4 and Theorem 1). The mapping gg is continuous, its image is total in E, and one has λ(a∗b)=⟨g(a)∣g(b)⟩\lambda (a^*b) =\langle g(a)|g(b)\rangle for every (a,b)∈A2(a, b)\in A^2. Put x=g(1)∈Ex=g(1)\in E.

The mapping gg of A into E is linear: in fact, for (a,b,c)∈A3(a, b, c)\in A^3 and (s,t)∈C2(s, t)\in \mathbf{C}^2, we have

⟨g(c)∣g(sa+tb)⟩=λ(c∗(sa+tb)) \langle g(c)|g(sa+tb)\rangle =\lambda (c^*(sa+tb))
=sλ(c∗a)+tλ(c∗b)=⟨g(c)∣sg(a)+tg(b)⟩ =s\lambda (c^*a) +t\lambda (c^*b) =\langle g(c)|sg(a) +tg(b)\rangle

whence the assertion, since the image of gg is total in E.

In particular, the image F of gg is a dense vector subspace of E. The kernel of gg is a left ideal of A: if g(b)=0g(b) = 0, then for all aa and cc in A, we have

⟨g(ab)∣g(c)⟩=λ((ab)∗c)=λ(b∗(a∗c))=⟨g(b)∣g(a∗c)⟩=0 \langle g(ab)|g(c)\rangle =\lambda ((ab)^*c) =\lambda (b^*(a^*c)) =\langle g(b)|g(a^*c)\rangle = 0

therefore g(ab)=0g(ab) = 0 since F is dense in E.

Let a∈Aa\in A. Since the kernel of gg is a left ideal of A, there exists a linear mapping φ~(a):F→F\widetilde{\varphi}(a) : F\rightarrow F such that φ~(a)(g(b))=g(ab)\widetilde{\varphi}(a)(g(b)) =g(ab) for every b∈Ab\in A. Moreover, for every b∈Ab\in A, we have

∥φ~(a)(g(b))∥2=∥g(ab)∥2=λ(b∗a∗ab)⩽∥a∗a∥λ(b∗b)⩽∥a∥2∥g(b)∥2 \|\widetilde{\varphi}(a)(g(b))\|^2=\|g(ab)\|^2=\lambda (b^*a^*ab)\leqslant \|a^*a\|\lambda (b^*b)\leqslant \|a\|^2\|g(b)\|^2

(lemma 3, c)), therefore φ~(a)\widetilde{\varphi}(a) is continuous and of norm ⩽∥a∥\leqslant \|a\|. Consequently, there exists a unique endomorphism φ(a)∈L(E)\varphi (a)\in \mathscr{L}(E) which induces φ~(a)\widetilde{\varphi}(a) by passing to the subspaces.

Let aa and bb be in A. We have

(φ(a)∘φ(b))(g(c))=g(abc)=φ(ab)(g(c)) (\varphi (a)\circ \varphi (b))(g(c)) =g(abc) =\varphi (ab)(g(c))

for every cc in A, therefore φ(ab)=φ(a)∘φ(b)\varphi (ab) =\varphi (a)\circ \varphi (b) since F is dense in E.

The mapping φ\varphi of A into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E) is linear: in fact, for every (a,b)∈A2(a, b)\in A^2 and every (s,t)∈C2(s, t)\in \mathbf{C}^2, we have

φ(sa+tb)(g(c))=g((sa+tb)c)=(sφ(a)+tφ(b))g(c) \varphi (sa+tb)(g(c)) =g((sa+tb)c) = (s\varphi (a) +t\varphi (b))g(c)

for every c∈Ac\in A, whence φ(sa+tb)=sφ(a)+tφ(b)\varphi (sa+tb) =s\varphi (a) +t\varphi (b) since F is dense in E. Since ∥φ(b)∥⩽∥b∥\|\varphi (b)\|\leqslant \|b\| for every b∈Ab\in A, the mapping φ\varphi is continuous. We also have φ(1)=1E\varphi (1) = 1_E since φ(1)(g(a))=g(a)\varphi (1)(g(a)) =g(a) for every a∈Aa\in A and F is dense in E.

Lastly, let a,b,ca,b,c be in A. We have

⟨g(c)∣φ(a∗)(g(b))⟩=⟨g(c)∣g(a∗b)⟩=λ(c∗a∗b) \langle g(c)|\varphi (a^*)(g(b))\rangle =\langle g(c)|g(a^*b)\rangle =\lambda (c^*a^*b)
=⟨g(ac)∣g(b)⟩=⟨φ(a)(g(c))∣g(b)⟩ =\langle g(ac)|g(b)\rangle =\langle \varphi (a)(g(c))|g(b)\rangle

whence φ(a∗)=φ(a)∗\varphi (a^*) =\varphi (a)^* since F is dense in E.

In conclusion, the mapping φ\varphi is a continuous morphism of involutive algebras of A into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E) and g(a)=φ(a)xg(a) =\varphi (a)x for every a∈Aa\in A; consequently, the triplet (E,x,φ)(E, x, \varphi ) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization of λ\lambda.

Proposition 6 03CA

Let A be an involutive Banach algebra and let λ\lambda be a continuous positive linear form on A. Let (E1,x1,φ1)(E_1, x_1, \varphi_1) and (E2,x2,φ2)(E_2, x_2, \varphi_2) be Hilbertian realizations of λ\lambda. Suppose that (E1,x1,φ1)(E_1, x_1, \varphi_1) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization.

a) There exists a unique continuous linear mapping uu from E1E_1 into E2E_2 which is a morphism of representations of φ1\varphi_1 into φ2(\varphi_2(I, p. 11) and which satisfies u(φ1(a)x1)=φ2(a)x2u(\varphi_1(a)x_1) =\varphi_2(a)x_2 for every a∈Aa\in A;

b) The linear mapping uu is isometric;

c) If (E2,x2,φ2)(E_2, x_2, \varphi_2) is cyclic, then uu is an isomorphism;

d) If (E2,x2,φ2)(E_2, x_2, \varphi_2) is cyclic and if A is unital, then u(x1)=x2u(x_1) =x_2.

For j∈{1,2}j\in \{1,2\}, define γj:A→Ej\gamma_j: A\rightarrow E_j by γj(a)=φj(a)xj\gamma_j(a) =\varphi_j(a)x_j for every a∈Aa\in A. By definition, the pairs (Ej,γj)(E_j, \gamma_j) are Hilbertian realizations of the universally positive kernel ff on A defined by (a,b)↦λ(a∗b)(a, b)\mapsto \lambda (a^*b). The Hilbertian realization (E1,γ1)(E_1, \gamma_1) is cyclic; by prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists therefore a unique continuous linear mapping u:E1→E2u: E_1\rightarrow E_2 such that γ2=u∘γ1\gamma_2=u\circ \gamma_1, and this mapping is isometric. Moreover, if (E2,x2,φ2)(E_2, x_2, \varphi_2) is also cyclic, then uu is an isomorphism. To prove a), b) and c), it is enough to prove that uu is a morphism of representations of φ1\varphi_1 into φ2\varphi_2.

Let a∈Aa\in A. For every b∈Ab\in A, we have

(u∘φ1(a))(γ1(b))=(u∘φ1(ab))x1=(u∘γ1)(ab) (u\circ \varphi_1(a))(\gamma_1(b)) = (u\circ \varphi_1(ab))x_1= (u\circ \gamma_1)(ab)
=γ2(ab)=φ2(a)(γ2(b))=φ2(a)(u(γ1(b))) =\gamma_2(ab) =\varphi_2(a)(\gamma_2(b)) =\varphi_2(a)(u(\gamma_1(b)))

therefore the continuous linear mappings u∘φ1(a)u\circ \varphi_1(a) and φ2(a)∘u\varphi_2(a)\circ u coincide on the subspace of E1E_1 generated by the image of γ1\gamma_1; this subspace is dense in E1E_1 by hypothesis, whence u∘φ1(a)=φ2(a)∘uu\circ \varphi_1(a) =\varphi_2(a)\circ u.

Finally, let us prove d). Suppose therefore that A is unital and that (E2,x2,φ2)(E_2, x_2, \varphi_2) is cyclic. There exists a cyclic Hilbertian realization (E3,x3,φ3)(E_3, x_3, \varphi_3) of λ\lambda such that φ3\varphi_3 is a unital morphism (prop. 5). Let j∈{1,2}j\in \{1,2\}. Applying the foregoing to (Ej,xj,φj)(E_j, x_j, \varphi_j) and (E3,x3,φ3)(E_3, x_3, \varphi_3), we see that there exists an isometric isomorphism u~j\widetilde{u}_j of EjE_j into E3E_3 such that u~j∘φj(a)=φ3(a)∘u~j\widetilde{u}_j\circ \varphi_j(a) =\varphi_3(a)\circ \widetilde{u}_j for every a∈Aa\in A. Taking a=1Aa= 1_A, we see that φj\varphi_j is unital. We then have x2=φ2(1A)x2=u(φ1(1A)x1)=u(x1)x_2=\varphi_2(1_A)x_2=u(\varphi_1(1_A)x_1) =u(x_1).

Remark 03CB

Retain the notation of the proposition. It is possible that u(x1)u(x_1) is different from x2x_2 (exercise 3, b) of V, p. 493). However, the triplet (E2,u(x1),φ2)(E_2, u(x_1), \varphi_2) is also a Hilbert representation of λ\lambda.

4. Representations of star algebras

Let A be a star algebra. Let A+A_+ denote the closed convex cone of positive elements of A (def. 6 of I, p. 115). A linear form λ\lambda on A is positive if and only if λ(A+)⊂R+(\lambda (A_+)\subset \mathbf{R}_+(I, p. 118, th. 2).

Proposition 7 03CC

Let A be a star algebra. Every positive linear form λ\lambda on A is continuous.

Let us first prove that λ\lambda is bounded on the intersection of A+A_+ and the unit ball of A. Suppose this is not so. Then there exists a sequence (xn)n⩾1(x_n)_{n\geqslant 1} in A+A_+ such that ∥xn∥⩽1\|x_n\|\leqslant 1 and λ(xn)⩾n\lambda (x_n)\geqslant n for every integer n⩾1n\geqslant 1. The series with general term n−2xnn^{-2}x_n converges to an element xx of A (cf. TG, IV, p. 33, Example 3). For every integer N⩾1N\geqslant 1, since

+∞+\infty

∑1n2xn∈A+\sum\frac{1}{n^2}x_n\in A_+,

n=N+1n=N+1

(I, p. 116, Prop. 14), it follows that

N N +∞+\infty

∑1n⩽∑1n2λ(xn)=λ(x)−λ(∑1n2xn)⩽λ(x)\sum\frac{1}{n}\leqslant \sum\frac{1}{n^2}\lambda (x_n) =\lambda (x)-\lambda (\sum\frac{1}{n^2}x_n)\leqslant \lambda (x),

n=1n=1n=N+1n=1n=1n=N+1

which is absurd (TG, IV, p. 33, Example 4).

Since every element of the unit ball of A is a linear combination with coefficients bounded by 1 of at most four positive elements of A of norm ⩽1\leqslant 1(I, p. 96, Lemma 2 and formula (4) of I, p. 117), we conclude that λ\lambda is continuous.

There exist involutive Banach algebras which admit positive linear forms that are not continuous (Exercise 3, (a) of V, p. 493).

Proposition 8 03CD

Let A be a stellar algebra and aa a nonzero element of A. There exists a positive linear form λ∈A+′\lambda \in A'_+ such that λ(a∗a)>0\lambda (a^*a)>0.

Consider the real Banach space AhA_h of hermitian elements of A. The set A+A_+ is a salient pointed closed convex cone in AhA_h (Prop. 14 of I, p. 116). The element a∗aa^*a is positive (Theorem 2 of I, p. 118) and nonzero; hence the hermitian element −a∗a-a^*a is therefore not positive. By EVT, II, p. 42, Cor. 5, there exists a continuous real linear form λ∈Ah′\lambda \in A'_h such that λ(−a∗a)<0\lambda (-a^*a)<0 and λ(A+)⊂R+\lambda (A_+)\subset \mathbf{R}_+. The linear form λ\lambda extends to a hermitian C\mathbf{C}-linear form on A (cf. I, p. 98), which is positive and has the required property.

Theorem 2 (Gelfand–Naimark) 03CE

Let A be a stellar algebra. There exist a Hilbert space E and an isometric morphism of involutive algebras φ\varphi of A into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E). If A is unital, there exists such a unital morphism.

For every b∈A−{0}b\in A-\{0\}, let λb\lambda_b be a continuous positive linear form on A such that λb(b∗b)>0\lambda_b(b^*b)>0 (Prop. 8). Since A admits an approximate unit (I, p. 121, Prop. 18), there exists a Hilbert realization (Eb,xb,φb)(E_b, x_b, \varphi_b) of λb\lambda_b (Prop. 5). If A is unital, one may suppose that φb\varphi_b is unital (loc. cit.). We have ∥φb(b)∥2=λb(b∗b)≠0\|\varphi_b(b)\|^2=\lambda_b(b^*b)\not = 0.

Let E be the external Hilbert sum of the spaces EbE_b for bb belonging to A −{0}-\{0\}. For every a∈Aa\in A, let us denote by φ(a)∈L(E)\varphi (a)\in \mathscr{L}(E) the unique continuous linear mapping whose restriction to EbE_b coincides with φb(a)\varphi_b(a) for every b∈A−{0}b\in A-\{0\}. The mapping a↦φ(a)a\mapsto \varphi (a) is a morphism of involutive algebras; it is injective, hence isometric (Prop. 9 of I, p. 112), and satisfies φ(1)=1E\varphi (1) = 1_E if A is unital. This completes the proof.

The category whose objects are stellar algebras and whose morphisms are morphisms of involutive algebras is therefore equivalent to the category whose objects are closed involutive subalgebras of the algebras of endomorphisms of Hilbert spaces, and whose morphisms are morphisms of involutive algebras.

5. Functions of positive type on a topological group

In this number, G is a topological group whose unit element is denoted by ee. The Hilbert spaces considered are complex.

Definition 4 03CF

A continuous function φ∈C(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{C}(G) is said to be of positive type on G if the function ff defined by f(g,h)=φ(g−1h)f(g, h) =\varphi (g^{-1}h) on G×GG\times G is a universally positive kernel on G.

Pos(G) denotes the set of functions of positive type on G, and Pos1(G)(_1(G) (resp. Pos⩽1(G))_{\leqslant 1}(G)) denotes the subset of φ∈\varphi \in Pos(G) such that φ(e)=1(\varphi (e) = 1 (resp. such that φ(e)⩽1)\varphi (e)\leqslant 1).

Example 03CG

Let ϱ\varrho be a unitary representation of G in a Hilbert space E and let x∈Ex\in E. Let φ\varphi be the diagonal matrix coefficient defined by φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩\varphi (g) =\langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle for all g∈Gg\in G; the function φ\varphi is continuous. We have

φ(g−1h)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)∗ϱ(h)x⟩=⟨ϱ(g)x∣ϱ(h)x⟩ \varphi (g^{-1}h) =\langle x|\varrho (g)^*\varrho (h)x\rangle =\langle \varrho (g)x|\varrho (h)x\rangle

for all (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G. Consequently φ∈\varphi \in Pos(G) (Theorem 1 of V, p. 432, (iv)). One has φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G) if and only if ∥x∥=1\|x\|= 1.

Definition 5 03CH

Let φ\varphi be a function of positive type on G. A Hilbert realization of φ\varphi is a pair (ϱ,x)(\varrho , x) where ϱ\varrho is a unitary representation of G in a Hilbert space E and x∈Ex\in E, such that φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩\varphi (g) =\langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle for all g∈Gg\in G.

If xx is a cyclic vector of ϱ\varrho, one says that this is a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ\varphi.

Proposition 9 03CI

Let φ∈C(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{C}(G). The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) The function φ\varphi is of positive type on G;

(ii) There exists a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ\varphi;

(iii) There exists a Hilbert realization of φ\varphi.

Condition (ii) implies condition (iii), and condition (iii) implies (i) by the above example.

Let us prove finally that (i) implies (ii). Let (E,γ)(E, \gamma ) be a cyclic Hilbert realization of the universally positive kernel defined by f(g,h)=φ(g−1h)f(g, h) =\varphi (g^{-1}h) for (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G. Let k∈Gk\in G. The continuous function γk:g↦γ(kg)\gamma_k:g\mapsto \gamma (kg) on G satisfies

⟨γk(g)∣γk(h)⟩=⟨γ(kg)∣γ(kh)⟩=f(kg,kh)=φ((kh)−1kg)=f(g,h) \langle \gamma_k(g)|\gamma_k(h)\rangle =\langle \gamma (kg)|\gamma (kh)\rangle =f(kg, kh) =\varphi ((kh)^{-1}kg) =f(g, h)

for all (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G, hence (E,γk)(E, \gamma_k) is a Hilbert realization of ff. By Prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists a unique unitary element ϱ(k)\varrho (k) in L(E)\mathscr{L}(E) such that γk=ϱ(k)∘γ\gamma_k=\varrho (k)\circ \gamma. For all g∈Gg\in G, and all (k1,k2)∈G×G(k_1, k_2)\in G\times G, we have

ϱ(k1k2)(γ(g))=γ(k1k2g)=ϱ(k1)(ϱ(k2)(γ(g))) \varrho (k_1k_2)(\gamma (g)) =\gamma (k_1k_2g) =\varrho (k_1)(\varrho (k_2)(\gamma (g)))

whence ϱ(k1k2)=ϱ(k1)ϱ(k2)\varrho (k_1k_2) =\varrho (k_1)\varrho (k_2) since the image of γ\gamma is a total subset of E.

Let k∈Gk\in G. For all g∈Gg\in G, one has ϱ(g)(γ(k))=γ(gk)\varrho (g)(\gamma (k)) =\gamma (gk), and the mapping from G into E defined by g↦ϱ(g)(γ(k))g\mapsto \varrho (g)(\gamma (k)) is therefore continuous. Since the endomorphism ϱ(g)\varrho (g) is unitary, it follows that ϱ\varrho is a unitary representation of G in E (Lemma 4 of V, p. 380). Put then x=γ(e)x=\gamma (e). The set of vectors ϱ(g)x=ϱ(g)(γ(e))=γ(g)\varrho (g)x=\varrho (g)(\gamma (e)) =\gamma (g) for gg ranging over G is total in E, therefore xx is a cyclic vector of ϱ\varrho. Since

⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩=f(e,g)=φ(g) \langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle =f(e, g) =\varphi (g)

for all g∈Gg\in G, the pair (ϱ,x)(\varrho , x) is a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ\varphi.

Proposition 10 03CJ

Let φ\varphi be a function of positive type on G and let (ϱ1,x1)(\varrho_1, x_1) and (ϱ2,x2)(\varrho_2, x_2) be Hilbertian realizations of φ\varphi, the Hilbertian representation (ϱ1,x1)(\varrho_1, x_1) being cyclic. There exists a unique isometric G-morphism uu of ϱ1\varrho_1 into ϱ2\varrho_2 such that u(x1)=x2u(x_1) =x_2. If (ϱ2,x2)(\varrho_2, x_2) is also cyclic, then uu is an isomorphism.

For 1⩽j⩽21\leqslant j\leqslant 2, let us denote by EjE_j the space of ϱj\varrho_j and by γj\gamma_j the function on G defined by γj(g)=ϱj(g)xj\gamma_j(g) =\varrho_j(g)x_j for every g∈Gg\in G. The pairs (E1,γ1)(E_1, \gamma_1) and (E2,γ2)(E_2, \gamma_2) are Hilbertian realizations of the function of positive type (g,h)↦φ(g−1h)(g, h)\mapsto \varphi (g^{-1}h), and (E1,γ1)(E_1, \gamma_1) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization. By Prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists a unique isometric linear mapping u:E1→E2u: E_1\rightarrow E_2 such that γ2=u∘γ1\gamma_2=u\circ \gamma_1. In particular, one has x2=γ2(e)=u(γ1(e))=u(x1)x_2=\gamma_2(e) =u(\gamma_1(e)) =u(x_1). Moreover, for all gg and hh in G, one has

ϱ2(g)u(γ1(h))=ϱ2(g)γ2(h)=γ2(gh)=u(γ1(gh))=u(ϱ1(g)γ1(h)) \varrho_2(g)u(\gamma_1(h)) =\varrho_2(g)\gamma_2(h) =\gamma_2(gh) =u(\gamma_1(gh)) =u(\varrho_1(g)\gamma_1(h))

and since the set of elements γ1(h)\gamma_1(h) for h∈Gh\in G is total in E1E_1, this means that uu is a G-morphism. By loc. cit., it is an isometric isomorphism if (ϱ2,x2)(\varrho_2, x_2) is also cyclic.

Proposition 11 03CK

Let φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G) and let (ϱ,x)(\varrho , x) be a cyclic Hilbertian realization of φ\varphi. Then ϱ\varrho is an irreducible representation of G if and only if φ\varphi is an extreme point (EVT, II, p. 57, def. 1) of Pos1(G)_1(G).

Let E be the space of ϱ\varrho. Suppose first that ϱ\varrho is not irreducible. Let F be a nonzero closed subspace of E, stable under ϱ\varrho, and different from E. Let us write x=x1+x2x=x_1+x_2, where x1∈Fx_1\in F and x2∈F∘x_2\in F^{\circ}. Then one has 1=∥x∥2=∥x1∥2+∥x2∥21 =\|x\|^2=\|x_1\|^2+\|x_2\|^2. The subrepresentation of E generated by x1x_1 is contained in F, hence x1≠xx_1\not =x since xx is a cyclic vector of ϱ\varrho, whence x2≠0x_2\not = 0. Analogously one verifies that x1≠0x_1\not = 0.

For j=1j= 1 and j=2j= 2, let us denote by φj\varphi_j the continuous function on G such that

φj(g)=1∥xj∥2⟨xj∣ϱ(g)xj⟩ \varphi_j(g) =\frac{1}{\|x_j\|^2}\langle x_j|\varrho (g)x_j\rangle

for all g∈Gg\in G. One has φj∈\varphi_j\in Pos1(G)_1(G)(V, p. 443, example). Since φ=∥x1∥2φ1+∥x2∥2φ2\varphi =\|x_1\|^2\varphi_1+\|x_2\|^2\varphi_2, it is enough to verify that φ1≠φ2\varphi_1\not =\varphi_2 in order to prove that φ\varphi is not an extreme point of Pos1(G)_1(G); for this it is enough to prove that φ≠φ1\varphi \not =\varphi_1.

Arguing by contradiction, suppose that φ=φ1\varphi =\varphi_1. Since one has ⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x2⟩=0\langle x_1|\varrho (g)x_2\rangle = 0 for all g∈Gg\in G, it would follow that

1∥x1∥2⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x⟩=1∥x1∥2⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x1⟩=φ1(g)=φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩ \frac{1}{\|x_1\|^2}\langle x_1|\varrho (g)x\rangle =\frac{1}{\|x_1\|^2}\langle x_1|\varrho (g)x_1\rangle =\varphi_1(g) =\varphi (g) =\langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle

for all g∈Gg\in G, whence ⟨x1∣y⟩=⟨∥x1∥2x∣y⟩\langle x_1|y\rangle =\langle \|x_1\|^2x|y\rangle for every element yy of the vector subspace of E generated by the elements ϱ(g)x\varrho (g)x for g∈Gg\in G, hence for all y∈Ey\in E since xx is a cyclic vector of ϱ\varrho. This would imply that x1=∥x1∥2xx_1=\|x_1\|^2x is also a cyclic vector of ϱ\varrho, which is a contradiction, whence the assertion.

Now suppose that ϱ\varrho is irreducible, and prove that φ\varphi is an extreme point of Pos1(G)_1(G). Let φ1≠φ2\varphi_1\not =\varphi_2 be elements of Pos1(G)_1(G) and let t1,t2∈[0,1]t_1,t_2\in [0,1] be such that t1+t2=1t_1+t_2= 1 and φ=t1φ1+t2φ2\varphi =t_1\varphi_1+t_2\varphi_2. For j∈{1,2}j\in \{1,2\}, let (ϱj,xj)(\varrho_j, x_j) denote a cyclic Hilbert realization of φj\varphi_j, and let EjE_j denote the space of ϱj\varrho_j. Let x3=t11/2x1+t21/2x2x_3=t^{1/2}_1x_1+t^{1/2}_2x_2. Then (ϱ1⊕ϱ2,x3)(\varrho_1\oplus \varrho_2, x_3) is a Hilbert realization of φ\varphi. Since (ϱ,x)(\varrho , x) is cyclic, there exists an isometric G-morphism u:E→E1⊕E2u: E\rightarrow E_1\oplus E_2 such that u(x)=x3u(x) =x_3 (Prop. 10).

Let j=1j= 1 or j=2j= 2. Since ϱ\varrho is irreducible, there exists λj⩾0\lambda_j\geqslant 0 such that the G-morphism uj=u_j= prj∘u_j\circ u of E into EjE_j satisfies

⟨uj(y)∣uj(y′)⟩=λj⟨y∣y′⟩ \langle u_j(y)|u_j(y')\rangle =\lambda_j\langle y|y'\rangle

for all yy and y′y' in E (Cor. 5 of V, p. 388, if uj≠0u_j\not = 0, and one may take λj=0\lambda_j= 0 otherwise). For all g∈Gg\in G, one has

tjφj(g)=⟨tj1/2xj∣ϱj(g)(tj1/2xj)⟩=⟨uj(x)∣ϱj(g)(uj(x))⟩ t_j\varphi_j(g) =\langle t^{1/2}_jx_j|\varrho_j(g)(t^{1/2}_jx_j)\rangle =\langle u_j(x)|\varrho_j(g)(u_j(x))\rangle
=⟨uj(x)∣uj(ϱ(g)x)⟩=λjφ(g) =\langle u_j(x)|u_j(\varrho (g)x)\rangle =\lambda_j\varphi (g)

Since φj(e)=φ(e)=1\varphi_j(e) =\varphi (e) = 1, it follows that φj=φ\varphi_j=\varphi if tj≠0t_j\not = 0. The assumption φ1≠φ2\varphi_1\not =\varphi_2 therefore implies that t1t_1 or t2t_2 must be zero, which proves that φ\varphi is an extreme point of Pos1(G)_1(G).

Lemma 4 03CL

Let φ∈\varphi \in Pos(G). The function φ\varphi is bounded on G and one has ∥φ∥∞=φ(e)\|\varphi \|_{\infty}=\varphi (e). Moreover, one has

∣φ(g−1h)−φ(h)∣⩽√2φ(e)(φ(e)−R(φ(g)))‾(1) |\varphi (g^{-1}h)-\varphi (h)|\leqslant \surd\overline{2\varphi(e)(\varphi(e) -\mathscr{R}(\varphi(g)))} \tag{1}

for every (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G.

Let (ϱ,x)(\varrho , x) be a Hilbert realization of φ\varphi. One has φ(e)=∥x∥2\varphi (e) =\|x\|^2. For every g∈Gg\in G, one therefore has ∣φ(g)∣=∣⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩∣⩽φ(e)|\varphi (g)|=|\langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle |\leqslant \varphi (e) by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. This proves the first assertion.

For every (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G, one has

φ(g−1h)−φ(h)=⟨x∣ϱ(g−1h)x⟩−⟨x∣ϱ(h)x⟩=⟨ϱ(g)x−x∣ϱ(h)x⟩ \varphi (g^{-1}h)-\varphi (h) =\langle x|\varrho (g^{-1}h)x\rangle - \langle x|\varrho (h)x\rangle =\langle \varrho (g)x-x|\varrho (h)x\rangle

since ϱ\varrho is unitary, whence

∣φ(g−1h)−φ(h)∣⩽∥ϱ(g)x−x∥∥ϱ(h)x∥⩽φ(e)1/2∥ϱ(g)x−x∥ |\varphi (g^{-1}h)-\varphi (h)|\leqslant \|\varrho (g)x-x\|\|\varrho (h)x\|\leqslant \varphi (e)^{1/2}\|\varrho (g)x-x\|

We conclude by observing that

∥ϱ(g)x−x∥2=2∥x∥2−2R(⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩)=2(φ(e)−R(φ(g))) \|\varrho (g)x-x\|^2= 2\|x\|^2-2\mathscr{R}(\langle x|\varrho (g)x\rangle ) = 2(\varphi (e)-\mathscr{R}(\varphi (g)))

Remark 03CM

The sets Pos(G) (resp. Pos1(G)_1(G) and Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G)) are self-adjoint convex subsets of the involutive algebra Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G). They are closed in the space Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) endowed with the topology of simple convergence. The set Pos(G) is a convex cone with vertex 0 in the real Banach space Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G).

6. Unitary Dual of a Locally Compact Group

Let G be a locally compact topological group. Endow G with a left Haar measure μ\mu. For p∈[1,+∞]p\in [1,+\infty ], denote by Lp(G)\mathscr{L}^p(G) (resp. Lp(G)L^p(G)) the space LCp(G,μ)\mathscr{L}_{\mathbf{C}}^p(G, \mu) (resp. the space LCp(G,μ)L^p_{\mathbf{C}}(G, \mu)). We identify the space Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) with its image in L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G).

Let Δ denote the module of G. Recall that L1(G)L^1(G) is an involutive Banach algebra whose involution is induced, by passing to quotients, by the mapping f↦f∗f\mapsto f^* where f∗(y)=Δ−1(y)f(y−1)f^*(y) = \Delta^{-1}(y)f(y^{-1}) for all f∈L1(G)f\in \mathscr{L}^1(G) and y∈G(y\in G (cf. I, p. 99, example 4). The Banach algebra L1(G)L^1(G) admits an approximate identity by INT, VIII, p. 172, §4, no7^o7, prop. 20.

Let ϱ\varrho be a unitary representation of G in a complex Hilbert space E. The mapping f↦ϱ(f)f\mapsto \varrho (f) is a continuous morphism of involutive algebras from L1(G)L^1(G) into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E) (lemma 1 of V, p. 401); it is a non-degenerate representation of L1(G)L^1(G) in E (INT, VIII, p. 139, § 2, no7^o7, prop. 10, (i)).

Proposition 12 03CN

Let E be a complex Hilbert space and π~\widetilde{\pi} an involutive algebra morphism from L1(G)L^1(G) into L(E)\mathscr{L}(E). If the representation π~\widetilde{\pi} is non-degenerate, then there exists a unique unitary representation π\pi of G in E such that π~(f)=π(f)\widetilde{\pi}(f) =\pi (f) for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G).

The uniqueness follows from INT, VIII, p. 139, § 2, no7^o7, cor. 3 of lemma 4.

Let us prove the existence of π\pi. We have ∥π~∥⩽1\|\widetilde{\pi}\|\leqslant 1 by Prop. 2 of I, p. 104. Let F be the subspace of E generated by the vectors of the form π~(f)x\widetilde{\pi}(f)x for ff in L1(G)L^1(G) and xx in E; it is dense in E since the representation π~\widetilde{\pi} is non-degenerate.

For every compact neighbourhood V of ee, let φV\varphi_V be a positive continuous function with support contained in V such that ∫φVμ=1\int\varphi_V\mu= 1. Let B\mathfrak{B} be a base of the filter of compact neighbourhoods of ee.

Let gg be in G and ff in L1(G)L^1(G). We have (φV∗εg)∗f→εg∗f(\varphi_V*\varepsilon_g)*f\rightarrow \varepsilon_g*f in L1(G)L^1(G) along the filter of sections of B\mathfrak{B} (INT, VIII, p. 172, § 4, no7^o7, Prop. 20), hence π~(φV∗εg)π~(f)\widetilde{\pi}(\varphi_V*\varepsilon_g)\widetilde{\pi}(f) converges to π~(εg∗f)\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_g*f) in L(E)\mathscr{L}(E). This implies that π~(φV∗εg)\widetilde{\pi}(\varphi_V*\varepsilon_g) converges simply along the filter of sections of B\mathfrak{B} to a linear mapping π(g)\pi (g) of F into F; this mapping is continuous by EVT, III, p. 26, Cor. 3, since ∥π~(φV∗εg)∥⩽1\|\widetilde{\pi}(\varphi_V*\varepsilon_g)\|\leqslant 1 for every compact neighbourhood V of ee. There therefore exists a unique endomorphism of E which induces π(g)\pi (g) by passing to subspaces. We again denote this endomorphism by π(g)\pi (g); we have ∥π(g)∥⩽1\|\pi (g)\|\leqslant 1.

Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G). Since π~(φV∗εg)π~(f)\widetilde{\pi}(\varphi_V*\varepsilon_g)\widetilde{\pi}(f) converges to π~(εg∗f)\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_g*f), we have π(g)π~(f)=π~(εg∗f)\pi (g)\widetilde{\pi}(f) =\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_g*f).

For g=eg=e, this relation shows that π(e)\pi (e) is the identity on F, hence π(e)=1E\pi (e) = 1_E. Let g1g_1 and g2g_2 be in G. We have

π(g1)π(g2)π~(f)=π(g1)π~(εg2∗f)=π~(εg1g2∗f)=π(g1g2)π~(f) \pi (g_1)\pi (g_2)\widetilde{\pi}(f) =\pi (g_1)\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_{g_2}*f) =\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_{g_1g_2}*f) =\pi (g_1g_2)\widetilde{\pi}(f)

whence π(g1)π(g2)=π(g1g2)\pi (g_1)\pi (g_2) =\pi (g_1g_2) on F, and therefore on E. This proves that the mapping g↦π(g)g\mapsto \pi (g) is a representation of G in E. Since ∥π(g)∥⩽\|\pi (g)\|\leqslant 1 and ∥π(g)−1∥\|\pi (g)^{-1}\| = ∥π(g−1)∥⩽\|\pi (g^{-1})\|\leqslant 1, the endomorphisms π(g)\pi (g) of E are isometric, hence unitary (EVT, V, p. 40, Prop. 3).

Let f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) and x∈Ex\in E. The mapping g↦εg∗fg\mapsto \varepsilon_g*f of G into L1(G)L^1(G) is continuous (INT, VIII, p. 136, § 2, no5^o5 and p. 144, § 3, no2^o2, formula (5)), and π~\widetilde{\pi} is continuous, hence the mapping g↦π~(εg∗f)x=π(g)π~(f)xg\mapsto \widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_g*f)x=\pi (g)\widetilde{\pi}(f)x is continuous at g=eg=e. Since F is dense in E, the representation π\pi is unitary (Lemma 4 of V, p. 380).

Let f1f_1 and f2f_2 be in L1(G)L^1(G). By INT, VIII, p. 127, §1, no5^o5, Prop. 7, we have the relation

f1∗f2=∫Gf1(g)(εg∗f2)dμ(g) f_1*f_2=\int_Gf_1(g)(\varepsilon_g*f_2)d\mu(g)

in L1L^1(G), whence

π~(f1)π~(f2)=π~(f1∗f2)=∫Gf1(g)π~(εg∗f2)dμ(g) \widetilde{\pi}(f_1)\widetilde{\pi}(f_2) =\widetilde{\pi}(f_1*f_2) =\int_Gf_1(g)\widetilde{\pi}(\varepsilon_g*f_2)d\mu(g)
=∫Gf1(g)π(g)π~(f2)dμ(g)=(∫Gf1(g)π(g)dμ(g))π~(f2) =\int_Gf_1(g)\pi (g)\widetilde{\pi}(f_2)d\mu(g) =(\int_Gf_1(g)\pi (g)d\mu(g))\widetilde{\pi}(f_2)

using INT, VI, p. 9, § 1, no1^o1, prop. 1. It follows that

π~(f)=∫Gf(g)π(g)dμ(g)=π(f) \widetilde{\pi}(f) =\int_Gf(g)\pi (g)d\mu(g) =\pi (f)

for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G). The proposition is proved.

Proposition 13 03CO

Let φ∈L∞(G)\varphi \in L^{\infty}(G). Denote by λφ\lambda_{\varphi} the continuous linear form f↦⟨f,φ⟩f\mapsto \langle f, \varphi \rangle on L1(G)L^1(G). Then φ\varphi is the class of a function of positive type on G if and only if λφ\lambda_{\varphi} is a positive continuous linear form on L1(G)L^1(G).

Suppose that λφ\lambda_{\varphi} is a positive continuous linear form on L1(G)L^1(G). Let (E,x,π~)(E, x,\widetilde{\pi}) be a cyclic Hilbert realization of λ\lambda (prop. 5 of V, p. 438).

Let π\pi be a unitary representation of G in E such that π(f)=π~(f)\pi (f) =\widetilde{\pi}(f) for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) (prop. 12). Then λφ(f)=⟨x∣π(f)x⟩\lambda_{\varphi}(f) =\langle x|\pi (f)x\rangle for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G).

Since

π(f)=∫Gf(g)π(g)dμ(g) \pi (f) =\int_Gf(g)\pi (g)d\mu(g)

for every f∈L1f\in L^1(G), we get

∫Gf(g)φ(g)dμ(g)=λφ(f)=⟨x∣π(f)x⟩=∫Gf(g)⟨x∣π(g)x⟩dμ(g) \int_Gf(g)\varphi (g)d\mu(g) =\lambda_{\varphi}(f) =\langle x|\pi (f)x\rangle =\int_Gf(g)\langle x|\pi (g)x\rangle d\mu(g)

for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G) (INT, VI, p. 9, § 1, no1^o1, prop. 1). Thus, φ\varphi is the class in L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) of the function on G defined by g↦⟨x∣π(g)x⟩g\mapsto \langle x|\pi (g)x\rangle, which is a function of positive type on G (prop. 9 of V, p. 443).

Conversely, let φ∈\varphi \in Pos(G). Let f∈K(G)f\in \mathscr{K}(G). Then we have

λφ(f∗∗f)=∫Gφ(y)∫GΔ(z)−1f(z−1)f(z−1y)dμ(z)dμ(y) \lambda_{\varphi}(f^**f) =\int_G\varphi (y)\int_G\Delta (z)^{-1}f(z^{-1})f(z^{-1}y)d\mu(z)d\mu(y)
=∫Gφ(y)∫Gf(z)f(zy)dμ(z)dμ(y) =\int_G\varphi (y)\int_Gf(z)f(zy)d\mu(z)d\mu(y)

(INT, VII, p. 19, § 1, no3^o3, formula (22)). The continuous function on G×GG\times G defined by (z,y)↦φ(y)f(z)f(zy)(z, y)\mapsto \varphi (y)f(z)f(zy) is bounded and

∫G∗∣φ(y)∣(∫G∗∣f(z)‾f(zy)∣dμ(z))dμ(y) \int_G^*|\varphi(y)|\left(\int_G^*|\overline{f(z)}f(zy)|d\mu(z)\right)d\mu(y)
⩽φ(e)∫G∗∫G∗∣f(z)∣∣f(zy)∣dμ(z)dμ(y) \leqslant\varphi(e)\int_G^*\int_G^*|f(z)||f(zy)|d\mu(z)d\mu(y)
=φ(e)(∫G∗∣f(z)∣dμ(z))2 =\varphi(e)\left(\int_G^*|f(z)|d\mu(z)\right)^2

according to INT, V, p. 94, § 8, no3^o3, prop. 8. We therefore deduce from the Lebesgue-Fubini theorem (INT, V, p. 96, § 8, no4^o4, th. 1) that

λφ(f∗∗f)=∫Gf(z)∫Gφ(y)f(zy)dμ(y)dμ(z) \lambda_{\varphi}(f^**f) =\int_Gf(z)\int_G\varphi (y)f(zy)d\mu(y)d\mu(z)
=∫G×Gf(z)f(y)φ(z−1y)d(μ⊗μ)(z,y) =\int_{G\times G}f(z)f(y)\varphi (z^{-1}y)d(\mu\otimes \mu)(z, y)

This implies that λφ(f∗∗f)⩾0\lambda_{\varphi}(f^**f)\geqslant 0 by Theorem 1, (i) of V, p. 432 applied to the measure induced by μ\mu on the support of ff (INT, IV, p. 186, § 5, no7^o7, def. 4). By continuity it follows that λφ(f∗∗f)⩾0\lambda_{\varphi}(f^**f)\geqslant 0 for every f∈L1(G)f\in L^1(G).

The spaces L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) and Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) are endowed with their topologies as Banach spaces, whose norm is denoted by f↦∥f∥∞f\mapsto \|f\|_{\infty}. Here we shall call weak topology on L∞L^{\infty}(G), Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) or Pos(G) the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G))\sigma (L^{\infty}(G),L^1(G)).

Since L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) is identified with the dual of L1(G)L^1(G) (INT, V, p. 61, §5, no8^o8, th. 4), every closed ball of L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) is compact for the weak topology (EVT, III, p. 17, cor. 3).

Corollary 03CP

In L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) endowed with the weak topology, the set Pos(G) is closed and the set Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) is compact.

The first assertion follows from the proposition, and the second then follows from EVT, III, loc. cit.

In general, Pos1(G)_1(G) is not compact for the weak topology, as is shown by the example of the group R\mathbf{R} (exercise 10 of V, p. 497).

Proposition 14 03CQ

The set of extreme points of Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) is equal to the union of the set of extreme points of Pos1(G)_1(G) and of the zero function. Moreover, the closed convex hull of the set of extreme points of Pos1(G)_1(G) contains Pos1(G)_1(G).

By cor. of prop. 13, the set Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) is a cap of the pointed convex cone Pos(G), which is defined by the gauge φ↦φ(e)\varphi \mapsto \varphi (e) (EVT, II, p. 61, def. 3 and prop. 4). Its extreme points are therefore the zero function and the elements φ\varphi of Pos1(G)_1(G) belonging to the extreme generators of Pos(G) (EVT, II, p. 62, cor. 1). These are the extreme points of Pos1(G)_1(G) (EVT, II, p. 61, prop. 3). The first assertion follows.

Let us prove the second assertion. Let φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G). Since the set Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) is compact for the weak topology (cor. of prop. 13), there exists a filter F\mathfrak{F} on the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) which converges to φ\varphi (EVT, II, p. 59, th. 1). Since the closed balls of the Banach space L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) are closed for the weak topology and since ∥φ∥∞=1\|\varphi \|_{\infty}= 1, we have limψ,F∥ψ∥∞=1_{\psi ,\mathfrak{F}}\|\psi \|_{\infty}= 1 (indeed, otherwise there would exist a real number c<1c <1 and a filter G\mathfrak{G} on the closed ball of radius cc in L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) which would be finer than F\mathfrak{F}, which would imply that φ\varphi belongs to this closed ball).

From the description of the extreme points of Pos⩽1_{\leqslant 1}(G), every element ψ\psi of the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) is a function of positive type on G of the form

ψ=∑i∈Itiψi \psi =\sum_{i\in I}t_i\psi_i

where I is a finite set, ψi\psi_i is an extreme point of Pos1(G)_1(G) for every i∈Ii\in I, and ti∈[0,1]t_i\in [0,1]. We have ∑iti=ψ(e)=∥ψ∥∞⩽1\sum_it_i=\psi (e) =\|\psi \|_{\infty}\leqslant 1 (lemma 4 of V, p. 446). If ψ≠0\psi \not = 0, the function

ψ∥ψ∥∞=∑i∈Itiψ(e)ψi \frac{\psi}{\|\psi\|_{\infty}}=\sum_{i\in I}\frac{t_i}{\psi(e)}\psi_i

therefore belongs to the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos1(G)_1(G). Since limψ,F∥ψ∥∞−1ψ=φ_{\psi ,\mathfrak{F}}\|\psi \|^{-1}_{\infty}\psi =\varphi, we conclude that φ\varphi belongs to the closed convex hull of the extreme points of Pos1(G)_1(G). The assertion follows.

7. Existence of irreducible representations

We retain the notation of the preceding number.

Theorem 3 (Raikov) 03CR

The weak topology on Pos1(G)_1(G) coincides with the topology of compact convergence.

We shall first prove a few lemmas.

Lemma 5 03CS

Let X be a locally compact topological space and ν\nu a positive measure on X. On every bounded subset of Cb(X)\mathscr{C}_b(X), the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(X),L1(X))\sigma (L^{\infty}(X),L^1(X)) is coarser than the topology of compact convergence.

Let B be a bounded subset of Cb(X)\mathscr{C}_b(X) and let M∈R+M\in \mathbf{R}_+ be such that ∥φ∥∞⩽M\|\varphi \|_{\infty}\leqslant M for every φ∈B\varphi \in B. Let ψ∈L1(X,ν)\psi \in L^1(X, \nu ) and ε>0\varepsilon >0. Fix a compact subset K of X such that

∫X−K∣ψ∣dν<ε \int_{X-K}|\psi |d\nu < \varepsilon

For all φ1\varphi_1 and φ2\varphi_2 in B, we then have

⟨φ1−φ2,ψ⟩=∫Xψ(φ1−φ2)dν \langle \varphi_1-\varphi_2, \psi \rangle =\int_X\psi (\varphi_1-\varphi_2)d\nu
=∫Kψ(φ1−φ2)dν+∫X−Kψ(φ1−φ2)dν =\int_K\psi (\varphi_1-\varphi_2)d\nu +\int_{X-K}\psi (\varphi_1-\varphi_2)d\nu

whence

∣⟨φ1−φ2,ψ⟩∣⩽|\langle \varphi_1-\varphi_2, \psi \rangle |\leqslant supx∈K∣φ1(x)−φ2(x)∣∥ψ∥1+2Mε_{x\in K}|\varphi_1(x)-\varphi_2(x)| \|\psi \|_1+ 2M\varepsilon,

and the lemma follows.

Lemma 6 03CT

Let ψ∈L1(G)\psi \in L^1(G). Let B be a bounded subset of the Banach space L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G). The mapping φ↦ψ∗φ\varphi \mapsto \psi *\varphi of B into Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) is continuous when B is endowed with the weak topology and Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) with the topology of compact convergence.

Let φ∈L∞(G)\varphi \in L^{\infty}(G) and η∈L1(G)\eta \in L^1(G). The function Δ−1ηˇ\Delta^{-1}\check{\eta} belongs to L1(G)L^1(G) and ⟨η,ψˇ⟩=⟨Δ−1η,ψˇ⟩(\langle \eta ,\check{\psi}\rangle =\langle \Delta^{-1}\check{\eta , \psi}\rangle (cf. INT, VII, p. 19, § 1, no3^o3, formula (22)). The mapping φ↦φˇ\varphi \mapsto \check{\varphi} is therefore an automorphism of the space L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) endowed with the weak topology.

Let φ∈L∞(G)\varphi \in L^{\infty}(G). By INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, no5^o5, prop. 14, the function ψ∗φ\psi *\varphi belongs to Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) and satisfies

(ψ∗φ)(g)=∫Gψ(h)φ(h−1g)dμ(h) (\psi *\varphi )(g) =\int_G\psi (h)\varphi (h^{-1}g)d\mu(h)

=∫Gψ(gy)φˇ(y)dμ(y)=⟨φ,ˇγG(1)(g−1)ψ⟩=\int_G\psi (gy)\check{\varphi}(y)d\mu(y) =\langle \check{\varphi ,}\boldsymbol{\gamma }^{(1)}_G(g^{-1})\psi \rangle for all g∈Gg\in G. It follows that the linear mapping u:φ↦ψ∗φu:\varphi \mapsto \psi *\varphi is a continuous mapping of the space L∞(G)L^{\infty}(G) endowed with the weak topology into Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) endowed with the topology of simple convergence.

Let φ∈B\varphi \in B and (g,h)∈G×G(g, h)\in G\times G. According to the above formula, we have

∣u(φ)(g)−u(φ)(h)∣⩽∥φˇ∥∞∥(γG(1)(g−1)−γG(1)(h−1))ψ∥1|u(\varphi )(g)-u(\varphi )(h)|\leqslant \|\check{\varphi}\|_{\infty}\|(\boldsymbol{\gamma }^{(1)}_G(g^{-1})-\boldsymbol{\gamma }^{(1)}_G(h^{-1}))\psi \|_1.

Since B is bounded and the left regular representation of G in L1(G)L^1(G) is continuous (No. 4 of V, p. 405), this implies that u(B)u(B) is an equicontinuous subset of Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G). The assertion then results from the foregoing and from TG, X, p. 16, th. 1.

Lemma 7 03CU

Let ψ∈L1(G)\psi \in L^1(G) be such that ψ⩾0\psi \geqslant 0 and ∫ψ=1\int\psi = 1. Let us denote by pp the seminorm on Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) defined by p(φ)=∣⟨φ,ψ⟩∣p(\varphi ) =|\langle \varphi , \psi \rangle | for all φ∈Cb(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{C}_b(G). For every φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G), one has

∥ψ∗φ−φ∥∞⩽√2p(1−φ)‾ \|\psi *\varphi -\varphi \|_{\infty}\leqslant \surd\overline{2p(1 -\varphi)}

Let φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G) and x∈Gx\in G. By INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, no5^o5, prop. 14, we obtain

∣ψ∗φ(x)−φ(x)∣=∣∫G(φ(y−1x)−φ(x))ψ(y)dμ(y)∣ |\psi *\varphi (x)-\varphi (x)|=|\int_G(\varphi (y^{-1}x)-\varphi (x))\psi (y)d\mu(y)|
⩽∫G∣φ(y−1x)−φ(x)∣ψ(y)dμ(y) \leqslant \int_G|\varphi (y^{-1}x)-\varphi (x)|\psi (y)d\mu(y)
⩽∫G√2(1−Rφ(y))‾ψ(y)dμ(y) \leqslant \int_G\surd\overline{2(1 -\mathscr{R}\varphi(y))}\psi (y)d\mu(y)

applying the majorization (1) of V, p. 446. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality then implies

√∫1/2∫1/2\surd \int 1/2\int 1/2
∥ψ∗φ−φ∥∞⩽2‾(G(1−R(φ))ψdμ)(Gψdμ) \|\psi *\varphi -\varphi \|_{\infty}\leqslant \overline{2}(_G(1-\mathscr{R}(\varphi ))\psi d\mu)(_G\psi d\mu)
√√ \surd \surd

⩽\leqslant 2 p(1−φ)p(1-\varphi ),

whence the result.

Lemma 8 03CV

Let K be a topological field and let E and F be topological vector spaces over K. Let ff be a mapping of E into F and X a subset of E. Let x∈Xx\in X. The mapping f∣Xf|X is continuous at xx if, for every neighbourhood W of 0 in F, there exist a neighbourhood U of xx in E and a continuous mapping gg of X into F such that (f−g)(U∩X)⊂W(f-g)(U\cap X)\subset W.

Let W0W_0 be a neighbourhood of 0 in F and let V0V_0 be a symmetric neighbourhood of 0 in F such that V0+V0+V0⊂W0V_0+V_0+V_0\subset W_0. Let U0U_0 be a neighbourhood of xx in E and gg a continuous mapping of X into F such that (f−g)(U0∩X)⊂V0(f-g)(U_0\cap X)\subset V_0. There exists a neighbourhood U1U_1 of xx in E such that g(U1∩X)⊂g(x)+V0g(U_1\cap X)\subset g(x) + V_0. For every y∈U0∩U1∩Xy\in U_0\cap U_1\cap X, one has

f(y)−f(x)=(f(y)−g(y))+(g(y)−g(x))+ f(y)-f(x) = (f(y)-g(y)) + (g(y)-g(x))+
(g(x)−f(x))∈V0+V0+V0⊂W0 (g(x)-f(x))\in V_0+ V_0+ V_0\subset W_0

hence f(y)∈f(x)+W0f(y)\in f(x) + W_0, whence the result.

Let us now prove theorem 3. Let us denote by Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f (resp. Pos1(G)c_1(G)_c) the set Pos1(G)_1(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence); analogously, let us denote by Cb(G)f\mathscr{C}_b(G)_f (resp. Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c) the space Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence).

The identity mapping of Pos1(G)c_1(G)_c into Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f is continuous (lemma 5). Conversely, let ι\iota denote the inclusion of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c. Let us prove that ι\iota is continuous, to conclude the proof.

Let φ1∈\varphi_1\in Pos1(G)_1(G). To verify that ι\iota is continuous at φ1\varphi_1, we apply lemma 8. Let W be a neighbourhood of 0 in Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c. It is enough to find a linear mapping uu of Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) into Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) which induces, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c, together with a neighbourhood U of 0 in Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f, such that one has (ι−u)(U∩(\iota -u)(U\cap Pos1(G))⊂W_1(G))\subset W.

There exists ε>0\varepsilon >0 such that W contains the set of φ∈Cb(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{C}_b(G) satisfying ∥φ∥∞⩽ε\|\varphi \|_{\infty}\leqslant \varepsilon. Since φ1(e)=1\varphi_1(e) = 1, there exists a compact neighbourhood V of ee in G such that

supx∈V∣1−φ1(x)∣⩽ε24_{x\in V}|1-\varphi_1(x)|\leqslant \frac{\varepsilon^2}{4}.

Let φV\varphi_V be the characteristic function of V, and put ψV=μ(V)−1φV\psi_V=\mu(V)^{-1}\varphi_V. The linear mapping u:φ↦ψV∗φu:\varphi \mapsto \psi_V*\varphi of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c is continuous (lemma 6).

Let qVq_V denote the seminorm φ↦∣⟨φ,ψV⟩∣\varphi \mapsto |\langle \varphi , \psi_V\rangle | on Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G); it is continuous for the weak topology. Since ψV\psi_V vanishes outside V, we have qV(1−φ1)⩽ε2/4q_V(1-\varphi_1)\leqslant \varepsilon^2/4; there therefore exists a neighbourhood U of φ1\varphi_1 in Cb(G)f\mathscr{C}_b(G)_f such that qV(1−φ)⩽ε2/2q_V(1-\varphi )\leqslant \varepsilon^2/2 for every φ∈U\varphi \in U.

Let φ∈U∩\varphi \in U\cap Pos1(G)_1(G). By lemma 7, one has

∥(ι−u)(φ)∥∞⩽√2qV(1−φ)‾⩽ε \|(\iota -u)(\varphi )\|_{\infty}\leqslant \surd\overline{2q_V(1 -\varphi)}\leqslant \varepsilon

therefore (ι−u)(U)⊂W(\iota -u)(U)\subset W. The theorem is proved.

In general, the weak topology on Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) does not coincide with the topology of compact convergence, as is shown by the example of the group R\mathbf{R}.

We recall that G^\widehat{G} denotes the set of classes of irreducible unitary representations of G (V, p. 393, def. 8).

Theorem 4 (Gelfand–Raikov) 03CW

For every x≠ex\not =e in G, there exists an irreducible unitary representation π\pi of G such that π(x)\pi (x) is not the identity endomorphism of the space of π\pi.

Let x∈Gx\in G be such that π(x)\pi (x) is the identity for every π∈G^\pi \in \widehat{G}. It follows that φ(x)=φ(e)=1\varphi (x) =\varphi (e) = 1 for every extreme point φ\varphi of Pos1(G)_1(G) (prop. 11 of V, p. 444), hence for every φ∈\varphi \in Pos1(G)_1(G) by prop. 14 since the linear form φ↦φ(e)\varphi \mapsto \varphi (e) is continuous on Pos1(G)_1(G) endowed with the weak topology (th. 3). But if x≠ex\not =e, there exists f∈L2(G)f\in L^2(G) of norm 1 such that ⟨f∣γG(x)f⟩=0\langle f|\boldsymbol{\gamma }_G(x)f\rangle = 0(V, p. 406, lemma 3). Since the left-hand side of this equality is of the form φ(x)\varphi (x), where φ∈\varphi \in Pos1_1(G), this is a contradiction.

If G is not locally compact, it is not always true that the irreducible unitary representations of G separate the points of G.

Corollary 03CX

For every elements g≠hg\not =h in G, there exists an irreducible representation π∈G^\pi \in \widehat{G} and a matrix coefficient ff of π\pi such that f(g)≠f(h)f(g)\not =f(h). In particular, the subalgebra Υ(G) of Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) separates the points of G.

Let g≠hg\not =h in G. There exists an irreducible representation π∈G^\pi \in \widehat{G} such that π(g)≠π(h)\pi (g)\not =\pi (h) (th. 4); hence there exist xx and yy in the space of π\pi such that ⟨x∣π(g)y⟩≠⟨x∣π(h)y⟩\langle x|\pi (g)y\rangle \not =\langle x|\pi (h)y\rangle.

8. Positive-definite functions on a locally compact commutative group

In this number, G is a locally compact commutative group and μ\mu denotes a Haar measure on G. We denote by G^\widehat{G} the dual group of G and by μ^\widehat{\mu} the measure dual to μ\mu (def. 4 of II, p. 214). We denote by F\mathscr{F} the Fourier transform on the Banach space M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) of bounded measures on G.

Since C0(G)\mathscr{C}_0(G) is the closure of K(G)\mathscr{K}(G) in Cb\mathscr{C}_b(G), the Banach space M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) dual of K(G)\mathscr{K}(G) endowed with the topology of Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) is identified with the dual of C0(G)(\mathscr{C}_0(G) (cf. INT, III, p. 56, § 1, no8)^o8). We endow M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) with the weak topology associated with this duality.

Lemma 9 03CY

The Fourier transform is a continuous mapping of M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) endowed with the weak topology into Cb(G^)\mathscr{C}_b(\widehat{G}) endowed with the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(G^),L1(G^))\sigma (L^{\infty}(\widehat{G}),L^1(\widehat{G})).

Let F\mathfrak{F} be a filter on M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) converging weakly to a bounded measure ν\nu on G. For every φ∈L1(G^)\varphi \in L^1(\widehat{G}), one has F(φ)∈C0(G)\mathscr{F}(\varphi )\in \mathscr{C}_0(G) (Prop. 4 of II, p. 209), hence

∫G^φF(ν)dμ^=∫GF(φ)dν \int_{\widehat{G}}\varphi \mathscr{F}(\nu )d\widehat{\mu}=\int_G\mathscr{F}(\varphi )d\nu

= limη,F∫GF(φ)dη=_{\eta ,\mathfrak{F}}\int_G\mathscr{F}(\varphi )d\eta = limη,F∫G^φF(η)dμ^_{\eta ,\mathfrak{F}}\int_{\widehat{G}}\varphi \mathscr{F}(\eta )d\widehat{\mu},

by the transposition property of the Fourier transform (Prop. 13 of II, p. 221). The lemma follows.

Theorem 5 (Bochner) 03CZ

A continuous function φ\varphi on G^\widehat{G} belongs to Pos(G^\widehat{G}) if and only if there exists a bounded positive measure ν\nu on G such that φ=F(ν)\varphi =\mathscr{F}(\nu ).

Let ν∈M1(G)\nu \in \mathscr{M}^1(G) be a positive measure. Its Fourier transform is continuous. For every finite family (xi)i∈I(x_i)_{i\in I} in G^\widehat{G} and every finite family (ti)i∈I(t_i)_{i\in I} of complex numbers, one obtains

∑i∈I∑j∈It‾itjF(ν)(xi−1xj)=∑i∈I∑j∈It‾itj∫Gxix‾jdν \sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\overline{t}_it_j\mathscr{F}(\nu )(x^{-1}_ix_j) =\sum_{i\in I}\sum_{j\in I}\overline{t}_it_j\int_Gx_i\overline{x}_jd\nu
=∫G∣∑i∈It‾ixi∣2dν⩾0 =\int_G|\sum_{i\in I}\overline{t}_ix_i|^2d\nu \geqslant 0

since ν\nu is a positive measure. The Fourier transform of ν\nu is therefore a function of positive type on G^\widehat{G} (Th. 1 of V, p. 432, (ii)).

Let us prove the converse. Endow the set Pos⩽1(G^)_{\leqslant 1}(\widehat{G}) with the weak topology, induced as above by the weak topology σ(L∞(G^),L1(G^))\sigma (L^{\infty}(\widehat{G}),L^1(\widehat{G})). The set Pos⩽1(G^)_{\leqslant 1}(\widehat{G}) is compact and convex (Cor. to Prop. 13 of V, p. 448). By Prop. 14 of V, p. 450, Prop. 11 of V, p. 444 and Cor. 7 of V, p. 390, the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G^)_{\leqslant 1}(\widehat{G}) are the zero function and the elements of G^\widehat{G}.

Let N\mathscr{N} be the set of bounded positive measures of mass ⩽1\leqslant 1 on G; it is compact in M1(G)\mathscr{M}^1(G) endowed with the weak topology (EVT, III, p. 17, Cor. 3). By Lemma 9 and the first part of the proof, the Fourier transform on G defines, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of N\mathscr{N} into Pos⩽1(G^)_{\leqslant 1}(\widehat{G}); by homogeneity, it is enough to prove that this mapping is surjective. The image F(N)\mathscr{F}(\mathscr{N}) of N\mathscr{N} under the Fourier transform is convex and compact; it contains the zero function and the elements of G^\widehat{G} (in fact, these are of the form evx:χ↦χ(x)_x:\chi \mapsto \chi (x) for an element xx of G by Th. 2 of II, p. 220, and one has evx=F(εx−1)_x=\mathscr{F}(\varepsilon_{x^{-1}})). The set F(N)\mathscr{F}(\mathscr{N}) therefore contains the extreme points of Pos⩽1_{\leqslant 1}(G), whence F(N)=\mathscr{F}(\mathscr{N}) = Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) by the Krein-Milman theorem (EVT, II, p. 59, Th. 1). This concludes the proof.

When G=RkG =\mathbf{R}^k for an integer k∈Nk\in \mathbf{N}, this theorem corresponds to Prop. 11 of INT, IX, p. 94, § 6, no12^o12.

Exercises

See the exercises for § 3.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.