Let f∈C(X×X). The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) For every compact subset Y of X and every positive measure μ on Y, the endomorphism of L2(Y,μ) defined by the kernel f∣(Y×Y) (Def. 1 of III, p. 29) is positive; in other words, one has
∫Y×Yh(x)h(y)f(x,y)d(μ⊗μ)(x,y)⩾0
for every h∈L2(Y,μ);
(ii) For every integer n∈N, every family (xi)0⩽i⩽n in X and every family (ti)0⩽i⩽n of complex numbers, one has
i=0∑nj=0∑ntitjf(xi,xj)⩾0
(iii) There exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→E with total image such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩ for all x and y in X;
(iv) There exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→E such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩ for all x and y in X.
It is apparent that (iii) implies (iv), and one sees that (i) implies (ii) by considering the discrete measure μ which is the image of the counting measure on {0,...,n} under the mapping i↦xi and the function h such that
h(x)=0⩽i⩽n∑ti
xi=x
Let us prove that (iv) implies (i). Suppose that there exist a complex Hilbert space E and a continuous mapping g:X→E such that f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩ for every (x,y)∈X×X. Let Y be a compact subset of X,μ a positive measure on Y and h∈L2(Y,μ). One has
∫Y×Yh(x)h(y)f(x,y)d(μ⊗μ)(x,y)
=∫Y×Yh(x)h(y)⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩d(μ⊗μ)(x,y)
=⟨∫Yh(x)g(x)dμ(x)∣∫Yh(y)g(y)dμ(y)⟩⩾0
by INT, V, p. 97, § 8, noo4, Prop. 9.
Finally, let us prove that (ii) implies (iii). Let E be the space of complex measures with finite support on X. For μ1 and μ2 in E, put
⟨μ1∣μ2⟩=∫X×Xf(x,y)(μ1⊗μ2)(x,y)
The sesquilinear form resulting on E is a positive Hermitian form. In fact, let μ∈E; there exist a finite family (xi)0⩽i⩽n in X and complex numbers (ti)0⩽i⩽n such that μ=∑i=0ntiεxi. One then has
⟨μ∣μ⟩=i=0∑nj=0∑ntitjf(xi,xj)⩾0
by hypothesis. Define g:X→E by g(x)=εx. The image of the mapping g generates E. Moreover, for every (x,y)∈X×X, one has on the one hand f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩ and on the other hand
∥g(x)−g(y)∥2=f(x,x)+f(y,y)−f(x,y)−f(y,x)
which implies that g is continuous since f is continuous.
Let E be the separated-completed Hilbert space of E (EVT, V, p. 8, cor. of the prop. 4) and g:X→E the composition of g and of the canonical mapping E→E. Then the mapping g is continuous, its image is total in E, and one has f(x,y)=⟨g(x)∣g(y)⟩ for all (x,y)∈X×X.
The method used to prove that (ii) implies (iii) is called the Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction.
A function f∈C(X×X) is said to be a universally positive kernel on X if it satisfies the equivalent conditions of Theorem 1.
If f is a universally positive kernel on X, a pair (E,g) satisfying condition (iv) of loc. cit. is called a Hilbert realization of f; if condition (iii) is satisfied, it is said to be a cyclic Hilbert realization.
We denote by Noy+(X) the set of universally positive kernels on X.
Let X′ be a separated topological space and h:X→X′ a continuous mapping. The mapping f↦f∘(h,h) from C(X′×X′) into C(X×X) induces, by passing to the subspaces, a mapping Noy+(X′)→ Noy+(X).
Let f be a universally positive kernel on X. Let (E1,g1) and (E2,g2) be Hilbert realizations of f. Suppose that (E1,g1) is a cyclic Hilbert realization. There then exists a unique continuous linear mapping u:E1→E2 such that g2=u∘g1. This mapping is isometric. If (E2,g2) is also cyclic, then u is an isomorphism.
The uniqueness of u results from the fact that the image of g1 is total in E1. Let F=C(X) and let (ex)x∈X be the canonical basis of F. For j=1 and j=2, denote by uj the linear mapping from F into Ej determined by uj(ex)=gj(x), and denote by Fj its image; the space F1 is dense in E1.
Consequently, there exists an isometric linear mapping v from F1 into F2 such that u2=v∘u1, and in particular g2(x)=v(g1(x)) for all x∈X. Since the image of g1 is total in E1, this mapping extends to an isometric linear mapping u from E1 into E2 such that g2=u∘g1.
By Lemma 8 of I, p. 107, the image of u is closed in E2. If (E2,g2) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization, the image of u is also dense in E2 and u is therefore an isomorphism.
The set Noy+(X) is a self-adjoint cone in the space C(X×X); it is stable under product and it is closed when C(X×X) is endowed with the topology of simple convergence.
real numberIt is elementary that ift⩾0, and that ff∈∈ NoyNoy++(X).(X), then tf∈ Noy+(X) for every
If (E1,g1) and (E2,g2) are Hilbertian realizations of universally positive kernels f1 and f2 on X, then the pair (E1⊕E2,g1+g2) (resp. the pair (E1⊗2E2,g1⊗g2)) is a Hilbertian realization of f1+f2 (resp. of f1f2); these are therefore universally positive kernels.
Characterization (ii) of Noy+(X) (Theorem 1) implies that this set is closed in C(X×X) endowed with the topology of simple convergence.
2. Supplement on the holomorphic functional calculus
For every subset X of C, X∗ denotes the image of X under complex conjugation. Let U be an open subset of C and g:U→C a holomorphic function. The function f∗:z↦g(z) is then defined and holomorphic on U∗. The mapping f↦f∗ is a continuous bijection of O(U) onto O(U∗) such that (f1f2)∗=f1∗f2∗ and (f1+f2)∗=f1∗+f2∗ for f1 and f2 in O(U).
Let C be a compact subset of C. The mappings f↦f∗ of O(U) into O(U∗), for U ranging over the open subsets of C containing C, induce a continuous bijection of the space O(C) onto O(C∗)(I, p. 49, no1), which is also denoted by f↦f∗ and which satisfies (f1f2)∗=f1∗f2∗ and (f1+f2)∗=f1∗+f2∗ for f1 and f2 in O(C).
Let A be a unital involutive Banach algebra. Let a∈A. The spectrum of a∗ is the image SpA(a)∗ of SpA(a) under complex conjugation. For every f∈O(SpA(a)), one has f(a)∗=f∗(a∗).
The first assertion follows from I, p. 97. From what precedes, the mapping φ of O(SpA(a)) into A defined by f↦(f∗(a∗))∗ is a continuous unital morphism of O(SpA(a)) into A such that the image of the germ in a neighbourhood of SpA(a) of the identity function of C is equal to a. Consequently, φ is the mapping f↦f(a) of the holomorphic functional calculus (I, p. 74, th. 5).
Let D be the open unit disk in C. There exists a unique holomorphic function f defined on D such that f(z)2=1−z for every z∈D and f(0)=1. One has f∗=f.
The radius of convergence of the power series
+∞(1/2)n
∑(−z)
n
n=0
is equal to 1 and its sum f defines a holomorphic function on D (VAR,
√
R1, p. 27, 3.2.9) taking the value 1 at 0. It satisfies f(x)=1−x for every x∈D∩R (FVR, III, p. 19), hence f(z)2=1−z for z∈D since the difference f(z)2−(1−z) is a holomorphic function all of whose successive derivatives vanish at 0 (VAR, R1, p. 27, 3.2.5). By definition, one verifies that f∗=f.
Let g be a holomorphic function on D such that g(z)2=1−z for every z∈D and such that g(0)=1. The function g does not vanish and the continuous function f/g on D takes its values in {−1,1}; since D is connected and f(0)=g(0), one has f=g.
Let A be an involutive Banach algebra and λ a positive linear form on A.
a) For all a and b in A, one has λ(a∗b)=λ(b∗a) and
∣λ(a∗b)∣2⩽λ(a∗a)λ(b∗b)
b) If A is unital, then the linear form λ is continuous and its norm is equal to λ(1).
The mapping (a,b)↦λ(a∗b) is a positive Hermitian form on A; it therefore satisfies λ(a∗b)=λ(b∗a) and ∣λ(a∗b)∣2⩽λ(a∗a)λ(b∗b) for all a and b in A (EVT, V, p. 2, remark and p. 3, prop. 2).
Let us prove b). Let a∈A be a hermitian element of norm <1. The spectral radius of a is less than ∥a∥, hence the spectrum of a is contained in the open unit disc D of C (Theorem 1 of I, p. 24). Let f be a holomorphic function on D such that f(z)2=1−z for all z∈D (Lemma 1 of V, p. 435). Applying the holomorphic functional calculus to the element a and to the function f, the element b=f(a) satisfies b2=1−a(I, p. 74, Theorem 5). By Prop. 3 of V, p. 435, one moreover has f(a)∗=f∗(a∗)=f(a), hence b is hermitian. We then have λ(1−a)=λ(b∗b)⩾0, whence λ(a)⩽λ(1).
Now let b∈A be of norm <1. The element b∗b is hermitian and ∥b∗b∥<1, hence applying a) with a=1, we find
∣λ(b)∣2⩽λ(1)λ(b∗b)⩽λ(1)2
with equality if b=1. The linear form λ is therefore continuous, and its norm is equal to λ(1). Assertion b) is proved.
Let X be a compact topological space and let A be the star-algebra C(X). Positive linear forms on A are identified with positive measures on X (INT, III, p. 52, § 1, no6, Theorem 1).
Let A be a unital involutive Banach algebra admitting an approximate unit (I, p. 120, Definition 7). Let λ be a continuous positive linear form on A.
a) For every a in A, one has λ(a∗)=λ(a) and ∣λ(a)∣2⩽∥λ∥λ(a∗a);
b) Let A be the involutive algebra obtained from A by adjunction of a unit element, and let e be its unit element. There exists a continuous positive linear form λ on A extending λ and such that λ(e)=∥λ∥;
c) For all a and b in A, one has ∣λ(b∗ab)∣⩽∥a∥λ(b∗b).
Let us prove a). Let F be an approximate unit of A. Let a∈A. Using Lemma 2, a) and the definition of an approximate unit, one finds
To prove b), one may suppose that λ is not zero, then that ∥λ∥=1. For a∈A and z∈C, let us put λ(a+z⋅e)=λ(a)+z. The mapping λ is a continuous linear form on A which extends λ and satisfies λ(e)=1. It is positive: for all a∈A and z∈C, by a), we calculate
λ((a+z⋅e)∗(a+z⋅e))=λ(a∗a)+zλ(a)+zλ(a∗)+∣z∣2
=∣z+λ(a)∣2+λ(a∗a)−∣λ(a)∣2⩾0
Finally, let b be an element of A. The mapping a↦λ(b∗ab) is a positive linear form on the unital involutive Banach algebra A. It is therefore continuous of norm equal to its value at e (Lemma 2, b)), which is equal to λ(b∗b), whence assertion c).
a) For every Hilbert space E, every morphism of involutive algebras φ:A→L(E) and every vector x∈E, the linear form defined on A by λ(a)=⟨x∣φ(a)x⟩ is a continuous positive linear form;
b) Let λ∈A+′. The mapping f of A×A into C defined by f(a,b)=λ(a∗b) for every (a,b)∈A×A is a universally positive kernel on A.
Let us prove a). For every a∈A, one has
λ(a∗a)=⟨x∣φ(a∗a)x⟩=∥φ(a)x∥2⩾0
therefore λ is a positive linear form on A; it is continuous since φ is continuous (Prop. 2 of I, p. 104).
Let us prove b). The function f is continuous. For every n∈N, every family (ai)0⩽i⩽n in A and every family (ti)0⩽i⩽n of complex numbers, one has
Let A be an involutive Banach algebra. Let λ∈A+′ be a continuous positive linear form on A. A Hilbertian realization of λ is by definition a triple (E,x,φ) consisting of a Hilbert space E, an element x of E and a morphism of involutive algebras φ of A into L(E), such that λ(b∗a)=⟨φ(b)x∣φ(a)x⟩ for every (a,b)∈A2.
If the set of elements φ(a)x for a∈A is total in E, one says that (E,x,φ) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization of λ.
Let A be an involutive Banach algebra admitting an approximate unit. Every continuous positive linear form on A admits a cyclic Hilbertian realization (E,x,φ). If A is unital, then there exists such a realization in which the morphism φ is unital.
One may suppose that A is a unital algebra (Lemma 3, b)).
Let λ be a continuous positive linear form on A. Let (E,g) be a cyclic Hilbertian realization of the universally positive kernel f on A defined by f(a,b)=λ(a∗b) (Prop. 4 and Theorem 1). The mapping g is continuous, its image is total in E, and one has λ(a∗b)=⟨g(a)∣g(b)⟩ for every (a,b)∈A2. Put x=g(1)∈E.
The mapping g of A into E is linear: in fact, for (a,b,c)∈A3 and (s,t)∈C2, we have
⟨g(c)∣g(sa+tb)⟩=λ(c∗(sa+tb))
=sλ(c∗a)+tλ(c∗b)=⟨g(c)∣sg(a)+tg(b)⟩
whence the assertion, since the image of g is total in E.
In particular, the image F of g is a dense vector subspace of E. The kernel of g is a left ideal of A: if g(b)=0, then for all a and c in A, we have
⟨g(ab)∣g(c)⟩=λ((ab)∗c)=λ(b∗(a∗c))=⟨g(b)∣g(a∗c)⟩=0
therefore g(ab)=0 since F is dense in E.
Let a∈A. Since the kernel of g is a left ideal of A, there exists a linear mapping φ(a):F→F such that φ(a)(g(b))=g(ab) for every b∈A. Moreover, for every b∈A, we have
(lemma 3, c)), therefore φ(a) is continuous and of norm ⩽∥a∥. Consequently, there exists a unique endomorphism φ(a)∈L(E) which induces φ(a) by passing to the subspaces.
Let a and b be in A. We have
(φ(a)∘φ(b))(g(c))=g(abc)=φ(ab)(g(c))
for every c in A, therefore φ(ab)=φ(a)∘φ(b) since F is dense in E.
The mapping φ of A into L(E) is linear: in fact, for every (a,b)∈A2 and every (s,t)∈C2, we have
φ(sa+tb)(g(c))=g((sa+tb)c)=(sφ(a)+tφ(b))g(c)
for every c∈A, whence φ(sa+tb)=sφ(a)+tφ(b) since F is dense in E. Since ∥φ(b)∥⩽∥b∥ for every b∈A, the mapping φ is continuous. We also have φ(1)=1E since φ(1)(g(a))=g(a) for every a∈A and F is dense in E.
Lastly, let a,b,c be in A. We have
⟨g(c)∣φ(a∗)(g(b))⟩=⟨g(c)∣g(a∗b)⟩=λ(c∗a∗b)
=⟨g(ac)∣g(b)⟩=⟨φ(a)(g(c))∣g(b)⟩
whence φ(a∗)=φ(a)∗ since F is dense in E.
In conclusion, the mapping φ is a continuous morphism of involutive algebras of A into L(E) and g(a)=φ(a)x for every a∈A; consequently, the triplet (E,x,φ) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization of λ.
Let A be an involutive Banach algebra and let λ be a continuous positive linear form on A. Let (E1,x1,φ1) and (E2,x2,φ2) be Hilbertian realizations of λ. Suppose that (E1,x1,φ1) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization.
a) There exists a unique continuous linear mapping u from E1 into E2 which is a morphism of representations of φ1 into φ2(I, p. 11) and which satisfies u(φ1(a)x1)=φ2(a)x2 for every a∈A;
b) The linear mapping u is isometric;
c) If (E2,x2,φ2) is cyclic, then u is an isomorphism;
d) If (E2,x2,φ2) is cyclic and if A is unital, then u(x1)=x2.
For j∈{1,2}, define γj:A→Ej by γj(a)=φj(a)xj for every a∈A. By definition, the pairs (Ej,γj) are Hilbertian realizations of the universally positive kernel f on A defined by (a,b)↦λ(a∗b). The Hilbertian realization (E1,γ1) is cyclic; by prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists therefore a unique continuous linear mapping u:E1→E2 such that γ2=u∘γ1, and this mapping is isometric. Moreover, if (E2,x2,φ2) is also cyclic, then u is an isomorphism. To prove a), b) and c), it is enough to prove that u is a morphism of representations of φ1 into φ2.
Let a∈A. For every b∈A, we have
(u∘φ1(a))(γ1(b))=(u∘φ1(ab))x1=(u∘γ1)(ab)
=γ2(ab)=φ2(a)(γ2(b))=φ2(a)(u(γ1(b)))
therefore the continuous linear mappings u∘φ1(a) and φ2(a)∘u coincide on the subspace of E1 generated by the image of γ1; this subspace is dense in E1 by hypothesis, whence u∘φ1(a)=φ2(a)∘u.
Finally, let us prove d). Suppose therefore that A is unital and that (E2,x2,φ2) is cyclic. There exists a cyclic Hilbertian realization (E3,x3,φ3) of λ such that φ3 is a unital morphism (prop. 5). Let j∈{1,2}. Applying the foregoing to (Ej,xj,φj) and (E3,x3,φ3), we see that there exists an isometric isomorphism uj of Ej into E3 such that uj∘φj(a)=φ3(a)∘uj for every a∈A. Taking a=1A, we see that φj is unital. We then have x2=φ2(1A)x2=u(φ1(1A)x1)=u(x1).
Retain the notation of the proposition. It is possible that u(x1) is different from x2 (exercise 3, b) of V, p. 493). However, the triplet (E2,u(x1),φ2) is also a Hilbert representation of λ.
4. Representations of star algebras
Let A be a star algebra. Let A+ denote the closed convex cone of positive elements of A (def. 6 of I, p. 115). A linear form λ on A is positive if and only if λ(A+)⊂R+(I, p. 118, th. 2).
Let A be a star algebra. Every positive linear form λ on A is continuous.
Let us first prove that λ is bounded on the intersection of A+ and the unit ball of A. Suppose this is not so. Then there exists a sequence (xn)n⩾1 in A+ such that ∥xn∥⩽1 and λ(xn)⩾n for every integer n⩾1. The series with general term n−2xn converges to an element x of A (cf. TG, IV, p. 33, Example 3). For every integer N⩾1, since
+∞
∑n21xn∈A+,
n=N+1
(I, p. 116, Prop. 14), it follows that
N N +∞
∑n1⩽∑n21λ(xn)=λ(x)−λ(∑n21xn)⩽λ(x),
n=1n=1n=N+1
which is absurd (TG, IV, p. 33, Example 4).
Since every element of the unit ball of A is a linear combination with coefficients bounded by 1 of at most four positive elements of A of norm ⩽1(I, p. 96, Lemma 2 and formula (4) of I, p. 117), we conclude that λ is continuous.
There exist involutive Banach algebras which admit positive linear forms that are not continuous (Exercise 3, (a) of V, p. 493).
Let A be a stellar algebra and a a nonzero element of A. There exists a positive linear form λ∈A+′ such that λ(a∗a)>0.
Consider the real Banach space Ah of hermitian elements of A. The set A+ is a salient pointed closed convex cone in Ah (Prop. 14 of I, p. 116). The element a∗a is positive (Theorem 2 of I, p. 118) and nonzero; hence the hermitian element −a∗a is therefore not positive. By EVT, II, p. 42, Cor. 5, there exists a continuous real linear form λ∈Ah′ such that λ(−a∗a)<0 and λ(A+)⊂R+. The linear form λ extends to a hermitian C-linear form on A (cf. I, p. 98), which is positive and has the required property.
Let A be a stellar algebra. There exist a Hilbert space E and an isometric morphism of involutive algebras φ of A into L(E). If A is unital, there exists such a unital morphism.
For every b∈A−{0}, let λb be a continuous positive linear form on A such that λb(b∗b)>0 (Prop. 8). Since A admits an approximate unit (I, p. 121, Prop. 18), there exists a Hilbert realization (Eb,xb,φb) of λb (Prop. 5). If A is unital, one may suppose that φb is unital (loc. cit.). We have ∥φb(b)∥2=λb(b∗b)=0.
Let E be the external Hilbert sum of the spaces Eb for b belonging to A −{0}. For every a∈A, let us denote by φ(a)∈L(E) the unique continuous linear mapping whose restriction to Eb coincides with φb(a) for every b∈A−{0}. The mapping a↦φ(a) is a morphism of involutive algebras; it is injective, hence isometric (Prop. 9 of I, p. 112), and satisfies φ(1)=1E if A is unital. This completes the proof.
The category whose objects are stellar algebras and whose morphisms are morphisms of involutive algebras is therefore equivalent to the category whose objects are closed involutive subalgebras of the algebras of endomorphisms of Hilbert spaces, and whose morphisms are morphisms of involutive algebras.
5. Functions of positive type on a topological group
In this number, G is a topological group whose unit element is denoted by e. The Hilbert spaces considered are complex.
A continuous function φ∈C(G) is said to be of positive type on G if the function f defined by f(g,h)=φ(g−1h) on G×G is a universally positive kernel on G.
Pos(G) denotes the set of functions of positive type on G, and Pos1(G)(resp. Pos⩽1(G)) denotes the subset of φ∈ Pos(G) such that φ(e)=1(resp. such that φ(e)⩽1).
Let ϱ be a unitary representation of G in a Hilbert space E and let x∈E. Let φ be the diagonal matrix coefficient defined by φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩ for all g∈G; the function φ is continuous. We have
φ(g−1h)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)∗ϱ(h)x⟩=⟨ϱ(g)x∣ϱ(h)x⟩
for all (g,h)∈G×G. Consequently φ∈ Pos(G) (Theorem 1 of V, p. 432, (iv)). One has φ∈ Pos1(G) if and only if ∥x∥=1.
Let φ be a function of positive type on G. A Hilbert realization of φ is a pair (ϱ,x) where ϱ is a unitary representation of G in a Hilbert space E and x∈E, such that φ(g)=⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩ for all g∈G.
If x is a cyclic vector of ϱ, one says that this is a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ.
Let φ∈C(G). The following conditions are equivalent:
(i) The function φ is of positive type on G;
(ii) There exists a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ;
(iii) There exists a Hilbert realization of φ.
Condition (ii) implies condition (iii), and condition (iii) implies (i) by the above example.
Let us prove finally that (i) implies (ii). Let (E,γ) be a cyclic Hilbert realization of the universally positive kernel defined by f(g,h)=φ(g−1h) for (g,h)∈G×G. Let k∈G. The continuous function γk:g↦γ(kg) on G satisfies
for all (g,h)∈G×G, hence (E,γk) is a Hilbert realization of f. By Prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists a unique unitary element ϱ(k) in L(E) such that γk=ϱ(k)∘γ. For all g∈G, and all (k1,k2)∈G×G, we have
ϱ(k1k2)(γ(g))=γ(k1k2g)=ϱ(k1)(ϱ(k2)(γ(g)))
whence ϱ(k1k2)=ϱ(k1)ϱ(k2) since the image of γ is a total subset of E.
Let k∈G. For all g∈G, one has ϱ(g)(γ(k))=γ(gk), and the mapping from G into E defined by g↦ϱ(g)(γ(k)) is therefore continuous. Since the endomorphism ϱ(g) is unitary, it follows that ϱ is a unitary representation of G in E (Lemma 4 of V, p. 380). Put then x=γ(e). The set of vectors ϱ(g)x=ϱ(g)(γ(e))=γ(g) for g ranging over G is total in E, therefore x is a cyclic vector of ϱ. Since
⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩=f(e,g)=φ(g)
for all g∈G, the pair (ϱ,x) is a cyclic Hilbert realization of φ.
Let φ be a function of positive type on G and let (ϱ1,x1) and (ϱ2,x2) be Hilbertian realizations of φ, the Hilbertian representation (ϱ1,x1) being cyclic. There exists a unique isometric G-morphism u of ϱ1 into ϱ2 such that u(x1)=x2. If (ϱ2,x2) is also cyclic, then u is an isomorphism.
For 1⩽j⩽2, let us denote by Ej the space of ϱj and by γj the function on G defined by γj(g)=ϱj(g)xj for every g∈G. The pairs (E1,γ1) and (E2,γ2) are Hilbertian realizations of the function of positive type (g,h)↦φ(g−1h), and (E1,γ1) is a cyclic Hilbertian realization. By Prop. 1 of V, p. 434, there exists a unique isometric linear mapping u:E1→E2 such that γ2=u∘γ1. In particular, one has x2=γ2(e)=u(γ1(e))=u(x1). Moreover, for all g and h in G, one has
and since the set of elements γ1(h) for h∈G is total in E1, this means that u is a G-morphism. By loc. cit., it is an isometric isomorphism if (ϱ2,x2) is also cyclic.
Let φ∈ Pos1(G) and let (ϱ,x) be a cyclic Hilbertian realization of φ. Then ϱ is an irreducible representation of G if and only if φ is an extreme point (EVT, II, p. 57, def. 1) of Pos1(G).
Let E be the space of ϱ. Suppose first that ϱ is not irreducible. Let F be a nonzero closed subspace of E, stable under ϱ, and different from E. Let us write x=x1+x2, where x1∈F and x2∈F∘. Then one has 1=∥x∥2=∥x1∥2+∥x2∥2. The subrepresentation of E generated by x1 is contained in F, hence x1=x since x is a cyclic vector of ϱ, whence x2=0. Analogously one verifies that x1=0.
For j=1 and j=2, let us denote by φj the continuous function on G such that
φj(g)=∥xj∥21⟨xj∣ϱ(g)xj⟩
for all g∈G. One has φj∈ Pos1(G)(V, p. 443, example). Since φ=∥x1∥2φ1+∥x2∥2φ2, it is enough to verify that φ1=φ2 in order to prove that φ is not an extreme point of Pos1(G); for this it is enough to prove that φ=φ1.
Arguing by contradiction, suppose that φ=φ1. Since one has ⟨x1∣ϱ(g)x2⟩=0 for all g∈G, it would follow that
for all g∈G, whence ⟨x1∣y⟩=⟨∥x1∥2x∣y⟩ for every element y of the vector subspace of E generated by the elements ϱ(g)x for g∈G, hence for all y∈E since x is a cyclic vector of ϱ. This would imply that x1=∥x1∥2x is also a cyclic vector of ϱ, which is a contradiction, whence the assertion.
Now suppose that ϱ is irreducible, and prove that φ is an extreme point of Pos1(G). Let φ1=φ2 be elements of Pos1(G) and let t1,t2∈[0,1] be such that t1+t2=1 and φ=t1φ1+t2φ2. For j∈{1,2}, let (ϱj,xj) denote a cyclic Hilbert realization of φj, and let Ej denote the space of ϱj. Let x3=t11/2x1+t21/2x2. Then (ϱ1⊕ϱ2,x3) is a Hilbert realization of φ. Since (ϱ,x) is cyclic, there exists an isometric G-morphism u:E→E1⊕E2 such that u(x)=x3 (Prop. 10).
Let j=1 or j=2. Since ϱ is irreducible, there exists λj⩾0 such that the G-morphism uj= prj∘u of E into Ej satisfies
⟨uj(y)∣uj(y′)⟩=λj⟨y∣y′⟩
for all y and y′ in E (Cor. 5 of V, p. 388, if uj=0, and one may take λj=0 otherwise). For all g∈G, one has
Since φj(e)=φ(e)=1, it follows that φj=φ if tj=0. The assumption φ1=φ2 therefore implies that t1 or t2 must be zero, which proves that φ is an extreme point of Pos1(G).
Let φ∈ Pos(G). The function φ is bounded on G and one has ∥φ∥∞=φ(e). Moreover, one has
∣φ(g−1h)−φ(h)∣⩽√2φ(e)(φ(e)−R(φ(g)))(1)
for every (g,h)∈G×G.
Let (ϱ,x) be a Hilbert realization of φ. One has φ(e)=∥x∥2. For every g∈G, one therefore has ∣φ(g)∣=∣⟨x∣ϱ(g)x⟩∣⩽φ(e) by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. This proves the first assertion.
The sets Pos(G) (resp. Pos1(G) and Pos⩽1(G)) are self-adjoint convex subsets of the involutive algebra Cb(G). They are closed in the space Cb(G) endowed with the topology of simple convergence. The set Pos(G) is a convex cone with vertex 0 in the real Banach space Cb(G).
6. Unitary Dual of a Locally Compact Group
Let G be a locally compact topological group. Endow G with a left Haar measure μ. For p∈[1,+∞], denote by Lp(G) (resp. Lp(G)) the space LCp(G,μ) (resp. the space LCp(G,μ)). We identify the space Cb(G) with its image in L∞(G).
Let Δ denote the module of G. Recall that L1(G) is an involutive Banach algebra whose involution is induced, by passing to quotients, by the mapping f↦f∗ where f∗(y)=Δ−1(y)f(y−1) for all f∈L1(G) and y∈G(cf. I, p. 99, example 4). The Banach algebra L1(G) admits an approximate identity by INT, VIII, p. 172, §4, no7, prop. 20.
Let ϱ be a unitary representation of G in a complex Hilbert space E. The mapping f↦ϱ(f) is a continuous morphism of involutive algebras from L1(G) into L(E) (lemma 1 of V, p. 401); it is a non-degenerate representation of L1(G) in E (INT, VIII, p. 139, § 2, no7, prop. 10, (i)).
Let E be a complex Hilbert space and π an involutive algebra morphism from L1(G) into L(E). If the representation π is non-degenerate, then there exists a unique unitary representation π of G in E such that π(f)=π(f) for every f∈L1(G).
The uniqueness follows from INT, VIII, p. 139, § 2, no7, cor. 3 of lemma 4.
Let us prove the existence of π. We have ∥π∥⩽1 by Prop. 2 of I, p. 104. Let F be the subspace of E generated by the vectors of the form π(f)x for f in L1(G) and x in E; it is dense in E since the representation π is non-degenerate.
For every compact neighbourhood V of e, let φV be a positive continuous function with support contained in V such that ∫φVμ=1. Let B be a base of the filter of compact neighbourhoods of e.
Let g be in G and f in L1(G). We have (φV∗εg)∗f→εg∗f in L1(G) along the filter of sections of B (INT, VIII, p. 172, § 4, no7, Prop. 20), hence π(φV∗εg)π(f) converges to π(εg∗f) in L(E). This implies that π(φV∗εg) converges simply along the filter of sections of B to a linear mapping π(g) of F into F; this mapping is continuous by EVT, III, p. 26, Cor. 3, since ∥π(φV∗εg)∥⩽1 for every compact neighbourhood V of e. There therefore exists a unique endomorphism of E which induces π(g) by passing to subspaces. We again denote this endomorphism by π(g); we have ∥π(g)∥⩽1.
Let f∈L1(G). Since π(φV∗εg)π(f) converges to π(εg∗f), we have π(g)π(f)=π(εg∗f).
For g=e, this relation shows that π(e) is the identity on F, hence π(e)=1E. Let g1 and g2 be in G. We have
whence π(g1)π(g2)=π(g1g2) on F, and therefore on E. This proves that the mapping g↦π(g) is a representation of G in E. Since ∥π(g)∥⩽ 1 and ∥π(g)−1∥ = ∥π(g−1)∥⩽ 1, the endomorphisms π(g) of E are isometric, hence unitary (EVT, V, p. 40, Prop. 3).
Let f∈L1(G) and x∈E. The mapping g↦εg∗f of G into L1(G) is continuous (INT, VIII, p. 136, § 2, no5 and p. 144, § 3, no2, formula (5)), and π is continuous, hence the mapping g↦π(εg∗f)x=π(g)π(f)x is continuous at g=e. Since F is dense in E, the representation π is unitary (Lemma 4 of V, p. 380).
Let f1 and f2 be in L1(G). By INT, VIII, p. 127, §1, no5, Prop. 7, we have the relation
Let φ∈L∞(G). Denote by λφ the continuous linear form f↦⟨f,φ⟩ on L1(G). Then φ is the class of a function of positive type on G if and only if λφ is a positive continuous linear form on L1(G).
Suppose that λφ is a positive continuous linear form on L1(G). Let (E,x,π) be a cyclic Hilbert realization of λ (prop. 5 of V, p. 438).
Let π be a unitary representation of G in E such that π(f)=π(f) for every f∈L1(G) (prop. 12). Then λφ(f)=⟨x∣π(f)x⟩ for every f∈L1(G).
for every f∈L1(G) (INT, VI, p. 9, § 1, no1, prop. 1). Thus, φ is the class in L∞(G) of the function on G defined by g↦⟨x∣π(g)x⟩, which is a function of positive type on G (prop. 9 of V, p. 443).
Conversely, let φ∈ Pos(G). Let f∈K(G). Then we have
λφ(f∗∗f)=∫Gφ(y)∫GΔ(z)−1f(z−1)f(z−1y)dμ(z)dμ(y)
=∫Gφ(y)∫Gf(z)f(zy)dμ(z)dμ(y)
(INT, VII, p. 19, § 1, no3, formula (22)). The continuous function on G×G defined by (z,y)↦φ(y)f(z)f(zy) is bounded and
∫G∗∣φ(y)∣(∫G∗∣f(z)f(zy)∣dμ(z))dμ(y)
⩽φ(e)∫G∗∫G∗∣f(z)∣∣f(zy)∣dμ(z)dμ(y)
=φ(e)(∫G∗∣f(z)∣dμ(z))2
according to INT, V, p. 94, § 8, no3, prop. 8. We therefore deduce from the Lebesgue-Fubini theorem (INT, V, p. 96, § 8, no4, th. 1) that
λφ(f∗∗f)=∫Gf(z)∫Gφ(y)f(zy)dμ(y)dμ(z)
=∫G×Gf(z)f(y)φ(z−1y)d(μ⊗μ)(z,y)
This implies that λφ(f∗∗f)⩾0 by Theorem 1, (i) of V, p. 432 applied to the measure induced by μ on the support of f (INT, IV, p. 186, § 5, no7, def. 4). By continuity it follows that λφ(f∗∗f)⩾0 for every f∈L1(G).
The spaces L∞(G) and Cb(G) are endowed with their topologies as Banach spaces, whose norm is denoted by f↦∥f∥∞. Here we shall call weak topology on L∞(G), Cb(G) or Pos(G) the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G)).
Since L∞(G) is identified with the dual of L1(G) (INT, V, p. 61, §5, no8, th. 4), every closed ball of L∞(G) is compact for the weak topology (EVT, III, p. 17, cor. 3).
The set of extreme points of Pos⩽1(G) is equal to the union of the set of extreme points of Pos1(G) and of the zero function. Moreover, the closed convex hull of the set of extreme points of Pos1(G) contains Pos1(G).
By cor. of prop. 13, the set Pos⩽1(G) is a cap of the pointed convex cone Pos(G), which is defined by the gauge φ↦φ(e) (EVT, II, p. 61, def. 3 and prop. 4). Its extreme points are therefore the zero function and the elements φ of Pos1(G) belonging to the extreme generators of Pos(G) (EVT, II, p. 62, cor. 1). These are the extreme points of Pos1(G) (EVT, II, p. 61, prop. 3). The first assertion follows.
Let us prove the second assertion. Let φ∈ Pos1(G). Since the set Pos⩽1(G) is compact for the weak topology (cor. of prop. 13), there exists a filter F on the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G) which converges to φ (EVT, II, p. 59, th. 1). Since the closed balls of the Banach space L∞(G) are closed for the weak topology and since ∥φ∥∞=1, we have limψ,F∥ψ∥∞=1 (indeed, otherwise there would exist a real number c<1 and a filter G on the closed ball of radius c in L∞(G) which would be finer than F, which would imply that φ belongs to this closed ball).
From the description of the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G), every element ψ of the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G) is a function of positive type on G of the form
ψ=i∈I∑tiψi
where I is a finite set, ψi is an extreme point of Pos1(G) for every i∈I, and ti∈[0,1]. We have ∑iti=ψ(e)=∥ψ∥∞⩽1 (lemma 4 of V, p. 446). If ψ=0, the function
∥ψ∥∞ψ=i∈I∑ψ(e)tiψi
therefore belongs to the convex hull of the extreme points of Pos1(G). Since limψ,F∥ψ∥∞−1ψ=φ, we conclude that φ belongs to the closed convex hull of the extreme points of Pos1(G). The assertion follows.
Let X be a locally compact topological space and ν a positive measure on X. On every bounded subset of Cb(X), the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(X),L1(X)) is coarser than the topology of compact convergence.
Let B be a bounded subset of Cb(X) and let M∈R+ be such that ∥φ∥∞⩽M for every φ∈B. Let ψ∈L1(X,ν) and ε>0. Fix a compact subset K of X such that
Let ψ∈L1(G). Let B be a bounded subset of the Banach space L∞(G). The mapping φ↦ψ∗φ of B into Cb(G) is continuous when B is endowed with the weak topology and Cb(G) with the topology of compact convergence.
Let φ∈L∞(G) and η∈L1(G). The function Δ−1ηˇ belongs to L1(G) and ⟨η,ψˇ⟩=⟨Δ−1η,ψˇ⟩(cf. INT, VII, p. 19, § 1, no3, formula (22)). The mapping φ↦φˇ is therefore an automorphism of the space L∞(G) endowed with the weak topology.
Let φ∈L∞(G). By INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, no5, prop. 14, the function ψ∗φ belongs to Cb(G) and satisfies
(ψ∗φ)(g)=∫Gψ(h)φ(h−1g)dμ(h)
=∫Gψ(gy)φˇ(y)dμ(y)=⟨φ,ˇγG(1)(g−1)ψ⟩ for all g∈G. It follows that the linear mapping u:φ↦ψ∗φ is a continuous mapping of the space L∞(G) endowed with the weak topology into Cb(G) endowed with the topology of simple convergence.
Let φ∈B and (g,h)∈G×G. According to the above formula, we have
Since B is bounded and the left regular representation of G in L1(G) is continuous (No. 4 of V, p. 405), this implies that u(B) is an equicontinuous subset of Cb(G). The assertion then results from the foregoing and from TG, X, p. 16, th. 1.
Let ψ∈L1(G) be such that ψ⩾0 and ∫ψ=1. Let us denote by p the seminorm on Cb(G) defined by p(φ)=∣⟨φ,ψ⟩∣ for all φ∈Cb(G). For every φ∈ Pos1(G), one has
∥ψ∗φ−φ∥∞⩽√2p(1−φ)
Let φ∈ Pos1(G) and x∈G. By INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, no5, prop. 14, we obtain
∣ψ∗φ(x)−φ(x)∣=∣∫G(φ(y−1x)−φ(x))ψ(y)dμ(y)∣
⩽∫G∣φ(y−1x)−φ(x)∣ψ(y)dμ(y)
⩽∫G√2(1−Rφ(y))ψ(y)dμ(y)
applying the majorization (1) of V, p. 446. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality then implies
Let K be a topological field and let E and F be topological vector spaces over K. Let f be a mapping of E into F and X a subset of E. Let x∈X. The mapping f∣X is continuous at x if, for every neighbourhood W of 0 in F, there exist a neighbourhood U of x in E and a continuous mapping g of X into F such that (f−g)(U∩X)⊂W.
Let W0 be a neighbourhood of 0 in F and let V0 be a symmetric neighbourhood of 0 in F such that V0+V0+V0⊂W0. Let U0 be a neighbourhood of x in E and g a continuous mapping of X into F such that (f−g)(U0∩X)⊂V0. There exists a neighbourhood U1 of x in E such that g(U1∩X)⊂g(x)+V0. For every y∈U0∩U1∩X, one has
f(y)−f(x)=(f(y)−g(y))+(g(y)−g(x))+
(g(x)−f(x))∈V0+V0+V0⊂W0
hence f(y)∈f(x)+W0, whence the result.
Let us now prove theorem 3. Let us denote by Pos1(G)f (resp. Pos1(G)c) the set Pos1(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence); analogously, let us denote by Cb(G)f (resp. Cb(G)c) the space Cb(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence).
The identity mapping of Pos1(G)c into Pos1(G)f is continuous (lemma 5). Conversely, let ι denote the inclusion of Pos1(G)f into Cb(G)c. Let us prove that ι is continuous, to conclude the proof.
Let φ1∈ Pos1(G). To verify that ι is continuous at φ1, we apply lemma 8. Let W be a neighbourhood of 0 in Cb(G)c. It is enough to find a linear mapping u of Cb(G) into Cb(G) which induces, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of Pos1(G)f into Cb(G)c, together with a neighbourhood U of 0 in Pos1(G)f, such that one has (ι−u)(U∩ Pos1(G))⊂W.
There exists ε>0 such that W contains the set of φ∈Cb(G) satisfying ∥φ∥∞⩽ε. Since φ1(e)=1, there exists a compact neighbourhood V of e in G such that
supx∈V∣1−φ1(x)∣⩽4ε2.
Let φV be the characteristic function of V, and put ψV=μ(V)−1φV. The linear mapping u:φ↦ψV∗φ of Pos1(G)f into Cb(G)c is continuous (lemma 6).
Let qV denote the seminorm φ↦∣⟨φ,ψV⟩∣ on Cb(G); it is continuous for the weak topology. Since ψV vanishes outside V, we have qV(1−φ1)⩽ε2/4; there therefore exists a neighbourhood U of φ1 in Cb(G)f such that qV(1−φ)⩽ε2/2 for every φ∈U.
Let φ∈U∩ Pos1(G). By lemma 7, one has
∥(ι−u)(φ)∥∞⩽√2qV(1−φ)⩽ε
therefore (ι−u)(U)⊂W. The theorem is proved.
In general, the weak topology on Pos⩽1(G) does not coincide with the topology of compact convergence, as is shown by the example of the group R.
We recall that G denotes the set of classes of irreducible unitary representations of G (V, p. 393, def. 8).
For every x=e in G, there exists an irreducible unitary representation π of G such that π(x) is not the identity endomorphism of the space of π.
Let x∈G be such that π(x) is the identity for every π∈G. It follows that φ(x)=φ(e)=1 for every extreme point φ of Pos1(G) (prop. 11 of V, p. 444), hence for every φ∈ Pos1(G) by prop. 14 since the linear form φ↦φ(e) is continuous on Pos1(G) endowed with the weak topology (th. 3). But if x=e, there exists f∈L2(G) of norm 1 such that ⟨f∣γG(x)f⟩=0(V, p. 406, lemma 3). Since the left-hand side of this equality is of the form φ(x), where φ∈ Pos1(G), this is a contradiction.
If G is not locally compact, it is not always true that the irreducible unitary representations of G separate the points of G.
For every elements g=h in G, there exists an irreducible representation π∈G and a matrix coefficient f of π such that f(g)=f(h). In particular, the subalgebra Υ(G) of Cb(G) separates the points of G.
Let g=h in G. There exists an irreducible representation π∈G such that π(g)=π(h) (th. 4); hence there exist x and y in the space of π such that ⟨x∣π(g)y⟩=⟨x∣π(h)y⟩.
8. Positive-definite functions on a locally compact commutative group
In this number, G is a locally compact commutative group and μ denotes a Haar measure on G. We denote by G the dual group of G and by μ the measure dual to μ (def. 4 of II, p. 214). We denote by F the Fourier transform on the Banach space M1(G) of bounded measures on G.
Since C0(G) is the closure of K(G) in Cb(G), the Banach space M1(G) dual of K(G) endowed with the topology of Cb(G) is identified with the dual of C0(G)(cf. INT, III, p. 56, § 1, no8). We endow M1(G) with the weak topology associated with this duality.
The Fourier transform is a continuous mapping of M1(G) endowed with the weak topology into Cb(G) endowed with the topology induced by the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G)).
Let F be a filter on M1(G) converging weakly to a bounded measure ν on G. For every φ∈L1(G), one has F(φ)∈C0(G) (Prop. 4 of II, p. 209), hence
∫GφF(ν)dμ=∫GF(φ)dν
= limη,F∫GF(φ)dη= limη,F∫GφF(η)dμ,
by the transposition property of the Fourier transform (Prop. 13 of II, p. 221). The lemma follows.
A continuous function φ on G belongs to Pos(G) if and only if there exists a bounded positive measure ν on G such that φ=F(ν).
Let ν∈M1(G) be a positive measure. Its Fourier transform is continuous. For every finite family (xi)i∈I in G and every finite family (ti)i∈I of complex numbers, one obtains
since ν is a positive measure. The Fourier transform of ν is therefore a function of positive type on G (Th. 1 of V, p. 432, (ii)).
Let us prove the converse. Endow the set Pos⩽1(G) with the weak topology, induced as above by the weak topology σ(L∞(G),L1(G)). The set Pos⩽1(G) is compact and convex (Cor. to Prop. 13 of V, p. 448). By Prop. 14 of V, p. 450, Prop. 11 of V, p. 444 and Cor. 7 of V, p. 390, the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G) are the zero function and the elements of G.
Let N be the set of bounded positive measures of mass ⩽1 on G; it is compact in M1(G) endowed with the weak topology (EVT, III, p. 17, Cor. 3). By Lemma 9 and the first part of the proof, the Fourier transform on G defines, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of N into Pos⩽1(G); by homogeneity, it is enough to prove that this mapping is surjective. The image F(N) of N under the Fourier transform is convex and compact; it contains the zero function and the elements of G (in fact, these are of the form evx:χ↦χ(x) for an element x of G by Th. 2 of II, p. 220, and one has evx=F(εx−1)). The set F(N) therefore contains the extreme points of Pos⩽1(G), whence F(N)= Pos⩽1(G) by the Krein-Milman theorem (EVT, II, p. 59, Th. 1). This concludes the proof.
When G=Rk for an integer k∈N, this theorem corresponds to Prop. 11 of INT, IX, p. 94, § 6, no12.