Let ψ∈L1(G). Let B be a bounded subset of the Banach space L∞(G). The mapping φ↦ψ∗φ of B into Cb(G) is continuous when B is endowed with the weak topology and Cb(G) with the topology of compact convergence.
Let φ∈L∞(G) and η∈L1(G). The function Δ−1ηˇ belongs to L1(G) and ⟨η,ψˇ⟩=⟨Δ−1η,ψˇ⟩(cf. INT, VII, p. 19, § 1, no3, formula (22)). The mapping φ↦φˇ is therefore an automorphism of the space L∞(G) endowed with the weak topology.
Let φ∈L∞(G). By INT, VIII, p. 167, § 4, no5, prop. 14, the function ψ∗φ belongs to Cb(G) and satisfies
(ψ∗φ)(g)=∫Gψ(h)φ(h−1g)dμ(h)
=∫Gψ(gy)φˇ(y)dμ(y)=⟨φ,ˇγG(1)(g−1)ψ⟩ for all g∈G. It follows that the linear mapping u:φ↦ψ∗φ is a continuous mapping of the space L∞(G) endowed with the weak topology into Cb(G) endowed with the topology of simple convergence.
Let φ∈B and (g,h)∈G×G. According to the above formula, we have
∣u(φ)(g)−u(φ)(h)∣⩽∥φˇ∥∞∥(γG(1)(g−1)−γG(1)(h−1))ψ∥1.
Since B is bounded and the left regular representation of G in L1(G) is continuous (No. 4 of V, p. 405), this implies that u(B) is an equicontinuous subset of Cb(G). The assertion then results from the foregoing and from TG, X, p. 16, th. 1.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.