Lemma 8
Tag 03CV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03CV].
Théories spectrales, chapter V, § 3. Fonctions de type positif
Let K be a topological field and let E and F be topological vector spaces over K. Let be a mapping of E into F and X a subset of E. Let . The mapping is continuous at if, for every neighbourhood W of 0 in F, there exist a neighbourhood U of in E and a continuous mapping of X into F such that .
Let be a neighbourhood of 0 in F and let be a symmetric neighbourhood of 0 in F such that . Let be a neighbourhood of in E and a continuous mapping of X into F such that . There exists a neighbourhood of in E such that . For every , one has
hence , whence the result.
Let us now prove theorem 3. Let us denote by Pos (resp. Pos) the set Pos endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence); analogously, let us denote by (resp. ) the space endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence).
The identity mapping of Pos into Pos is continuous (lemma 5). Conversely, let denote the inclusion of Pos into . Let us prove that is continuous, to conclude the proof.
Let Pos. To verify that is continuous at , we apply lemma 8. Let W be a neighbourhood of 0 in . It is enough to find a linear mapping of into which induces, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of Pos into , together with a neighbourhood U of 0 in Pos, such that one has Pos.
There exists such that W contains the set of satisfying . Since , there exists a compact neighbourhood V of in G such that
sup.
Let be the characteristic function of V, and put . The linear mapping of Pos into is continuous (lemma 6).
Let denote the seminorm on ; it is continuous for the weak topology. Since vanishes outside V, we have ; there therefore exists a neighbourhood U of in such that for every .
Let Pos. By lemma 7, one has
therefore . The theorem is proved.
In general, the weak topology on Pos does not coincide with the topology of compact convergence, as is shown by the example of the group .
We recall that denotes the set of classes of irreducible unitary representations of G (V, p. 393, def. 8).
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.
Cites
Nothing.