Bourbaki

Lemma 8

Tag 03CV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03CV].

Théories spectrales, chapter V, § 3. Fonctions de type positif

Let K be a topological field and let E and F be topological vector spaces over K. Let ff be a mapping of E into F and X a subset of E. Let x∈Xx\in X. The mapping f∣Xf|X is continuous at xx if, for every neighbourhood W of 0 in F, there exist a neighbourhood U of xx in E and a continuous mapping gg of X into F such that (f−g)(U∩X)⊂W(f-g)(U\cap X)\subset W.

Let W0W_0 be a neighbourhood of 0 in F and let V0V_0 be a symmetric neighbourhood of 0 in F such that V0+V0+V0⊂W0V_0+V_0+V_0\subset W_0. Let U0U_0 be a neighbourhood of xx in E and gg a continuous mapping of X into F such that (f−g)(U0∩X)⊂V0(f-g)(U_0\cap X)\subset V_0. There exists a neighbourhood U1U_1 of xx in E such that g(U1∩X)⊂g(x)+V0g(U_1\cap X)\subset g(x) + V_0. For every y∈U0∩U1∩Xy\in U_0\cap U_1\cap X, one has

f(y)−f(x)=(f(y)−g(y))+(g(y)−g(x))+ f(y)-f(x) = (f(y)-g(y)) + (g(y)-g(x))+
(g(x)−f(x))∈V0+V0+V0⊂W0 (g(x)-f(x))\in V_0+ V_0+ V_0\subset W_0

hence f(y)∈f(x)+W0f(y)\in f(x) + W_0, whence the result.

Let us now prove theorem 3. Let us denote by Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f (resp. Pos1(G)c_1(G)_c) the set Pos1(G)_1(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence); analogously, let us denote by Cb(G)f\mathscr{C}_b(G)_f (resp. Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c) the space Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) endowed with the weak topology (resp. with the topology of compact convergence).

The identity mapping of Pos1(G)c_1(G)_c into Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f is continuous (lemma 5). Conversely, let ι\iota denote the inclusion of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c. Let us prove that ι\iota is continuous, to conclude the proof.

Let φ1∈\varphi_1\in Pos1(G)_1(G). To verify that ι\iota is continuous at φ1\varphi_1, we apply lemma 8. Let W be a neighbourhood of 0 in Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c. It is enough to find a linear mapping uu of Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) into Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G) which induces, by passing to subspaces, a continuous mapping of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c, together with a neighbourhood U of 0 in Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f, such that one has (ι−u)(U∩(\iota -u)(U\cap Pos1(G))⊂W_1(G))\subset W.

There exists ε>0\varepsilon >0 such that W contains the set of φ∈Cb(G)\varphi \in \mathscr{C}_b(G) satisfying ∥φ∥∞⩽ε\|\varphi \|_{\infty}\leqslant \varepsilon. Since φ1(e)=1\varphi_1(e) = 1, there exists a compact neighbourhood V of ee in G such that

supx∈V∣1−φ1(x)∣⩽ε24_{x\in V}|1-\varphi_1(x)|\leqslant \frac{\varepsilon^2}{4}.

Let φV\varphi_V be the characteristic function of V, and put ψV=μ(V)−1φV\psi_V=\mu(V)^{-1}\varphi_V. The linear mapping u:φ↦ψV∗φu:\varphi \mapsto \psi_V*\varphi of Pos1(G)f_1(G)_f into Cb(G)c\mathscr{C}_b(G)_c is continuous (lemma 6).

Let qVq_V denote the seminorm φ↦∣⟨φ,ψV⟩∣\varphi \mapsto |\langle \varphi , \psi_V\rangle | on Cb(G)\mathscr{C}_b(G); it is continuous for the weak topology. Since ψV\psi_V vanishes outside V, we have qV(1−φ1)⩽ε2/4q_V(1-\varphi_1)\leqslant \varepsilon^2/4; there therefore exists a neighbourhood U of φ1\varphi_1 in Cb(G)f\mathscr{C}_b(G)_f such that qV(1−φ)⩽ε2/2q_V(1-\varphi )\leqslant \varepsilon^2/2 for every φ∈U\varphi \in U.

Let φ∈U∩\varphi \in U\cap Pos1(G)_1(G). By lemma 7, one has

∥(ι−u)(φ)∥∞⩽√2qV(1−φ)‾⩽ε \|(\iota -u)(\varphi )\|_{\infty}\leqslant \surd\overline{2q_V(1 -\varphi)}\leqslant \varepsilon

therefore (ι−u)(U)⊂W(\iota -u)(U)\subset W. The theorem is proved.

In general, the weak topology on Pos⩽1(G)_{\leqslant 1}(G) does not coincide with the topology of compact convergence, as is shown by the example of the group R\mathbf{R}.

We recall that G^\widehat{G} denotes the set of classes of irreducible unitary representations of G (V, p. 393, def. 8).

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Machine translation of the English, by gpt-5.4, gpt-5-6-mini, against glossary version 34. Not checked by a person. That model is a cut down version of the one the rest of this language was written by.