Proposition 8
Tag 03HS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03HS].
Theory of Sets, chapter II, § 3. Correspondences
Let be a mapping of A into B. If there exists a mapping (resp. ) of B into A such that (resp. ) is the identity mapping of A (resp. B), then is injective (resp. surjective). Conversely, if is surjective, there exists a mapping of B into A such that is the identity mapping of B. If is injective and if A , there exists a mapping of B into A such that is the identity mapping of A.
If there exists a mapping of B into A such that is the identity mapping of A, then the equality , where and , implies , and so is injective. If there exists a mapping of B into A such that is the identity mapping of B, we have , so that is surjective. If is surjective, let T denote the term . We have for ; if denotes the mapping , then is the identity mapping of B. Finally, suppose that is injective and that A , and let be an element of A. The relation
implies and therefore has a graph R with respect to the letters , . This graph is functional by reason of the hypothesis on , and has B as its domain; and we have if , and if . Hence the function is such that is the identity mapping of A.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- alg-i-s7-prop-2 not in this corpus
- Theorem 1, § 3
- Corollary, § 5
- Proposition 12, § 3
- Proposition 3, § 3
Cites
Nothing.