Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 03L9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03L9].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 4. Natural integers. Finite sets

Let E be a right directed preordered set (resp. a lattice, resp. a totally ordered set). Then every non-empty finite subset of E is bounded above (resp. has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, resp. has a greatest element and a least element).

The proof is by induction on the number nn of elements of the subset under consideration. The result is trivial for n=1n = 1. Let X be a subset of n+1n + 1 elements of E (with n⩾1n \geqslant 1), and put X=Y∪{x}\mathrm{X} = \mathrm{Y} \cup \{x\}, where Y has nn elements and is therefore not empty. The inductive hypothesis implies the existence of an upper bound (resp. least upper bound, resp. greatest element) yy of Y. Since E is right directed (resp. a lattice, resp. totally ordered), {x,y}\{x, y\} has an upper bound (resp. least upper bound, resp. greatest element) which is evidently an upper bound (resp. least upper bound, resp. greatest element) of X.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.