Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 03LD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03LD].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 4. Natural integers. Finite sets

Every set S\mathfrak{S} of subsets of a set EE which is of finite character has a maximal element (when ordered by inclusion).

By Theorem 2 of § 2, no. 4 it is enough to show that S\mathfrak{S} is inductive. To do this we shall show that if G\mathfrak{G} is any subset of S\mathfrak{S} which is totally ordered by inclusion, the union XX of the sets of G\mathfrak{G} belongs to S\mathfrak{S} (§ 2, no. 4, Theorem 2, Corollary 2). Since S\mathfrak{S} is of finite character, it is enough to show that every finite subset YY of XX belongs to S\mathfrak{S}. Now, for each y∈Yy \in Y, there exists a set Zy∈GZ_y \in \mathfrak{G} such that y∈Zyy \in Z_y. Since the set of sets ZyZ_y (y∈Y)(y \in Y) is finite and totally ordered by inclusion, it has a greatest element SS (no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 3); in other words, there exists a set S∈GS \in \mathfrak{G} such that Y⊂SY \subset S. But since S∈SS \in \mathfrak{S} and since YY is a finite subset of SS, we have Y∈SY \in \mathfrak{S} because S\mathfrak{S} is of finite character; this completes the proof.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.