Exercise 1, § 5
Tag 03MD, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03MD].
Theory of Sets, III, 235
Prove the formula
where and (generalize the argument of no. 8, Corollary to Proposition 14).
Solution
This solution was written by nemotron-3-ultra-free and judged by a machine. It is not Bourbaki's and it has not been checked by a person.
Let , , be integers such that and . Consider the set of integers from to . By Corollary 1 to Proposition 11, the number of subsets of with exactly elements is .
For each integer with , let be the set of all -element subsets of whose -th smallest element equals . The sets are pairwise disjoint and their union is the set of all -element subsets of ; indeed, if is a -element subset with elements , then must satisfy , so belongs to exactly one .
Fix in the above range. By Proposition 5 of no. 3, the interval has elements and the interval has elements. To form a subset , we must choose elements from and elements from , and then take their union with . The number of ways to choose elements from is by Corollary 1 to Proposition 11 applied to the set . The number of ways to choose elements from is by the same corollary applied to . These choices are independent, and the mapping is a bijection from the Cartesian product of the set of -element subsets of and the set of -element subsets of onto . Hence .
Since the sets form a partition of the set of all -element subsets of , the cardinal of the latter is the sum of the cardinals of the . Therefore
Cited by
Nothing.