Bourbaki

Definition 1

Tag 03MV, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03MV].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 6. Infinite sets

A set is said to be infinite if it is not finite.

In particular, a cardinal is infinite if it is not an integer.

The relation "there exists an infinite set" implies that the relation "xx is an integer" is collectivizing (Chapter II, § 1, no. 4); for if a\mathfrak{a} is an infinite cardinal and nn an arbitrary integer, we cannot have a⩽n\mathfrak{a} \leqslant n (§ 4, no. 2, Proposition 2). We have therefore n<an < \mathfrak{a} for all integers nn, which shows that the set of integers <a< \mathfrak{a} (§ 3, no. 2, Remark following Theorem 1) contains all integers. Conversely, if the relation "xx is an integer" is collectivizing, then the set E of integers is an infinite set. For each integer nn, the interval [0,n][0, n] is a subset of n+1n + 1 elements of E (§ 5, no. 3, Proposition 5). Therefore Card (E) ⩾n+1>n\geqslant n + 1 > n. But to say that Card(E) ≠n\neq n for every integer nn means that E is infinite.

¶ We now introduce the following axiom :

A5 ("Axiom of infinity".) There exists an infinite set.

It is not known whether or not this axiom can be deduced from the axioms and axiom schemes introduced previously; although the question has not been definitively settled, it is to be presumed that this axiom is independent of the others.

The preceding remarks then prove the following theorem :

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.