Let(Eα,fβα)and(Eα′,fβα′)be two direct systems of sets, let(uα)be a direct system of mappingsuα:Eα→Eα′, and letu=limuα.
(i) Let(Mα)be a direct system of subsets of theEα. Then(uα(Mα))is a direct system of subsets of theEα′, and we have
(26)
limuα(Mα)=u(limMα).
(ii) Let(aα′)α∈Ibe a family such thataα′∈Eα′for eachα∈Iandfβα′(aα′)=aβ′wheneverα⩽β. Then the setsu−1α(aα′)form a direct system of subsets of theEα, and we have
(27)
limu−1α(aα′)=u−1(a′),
wherea′is the unique element oflimEα′which is the canonical image ofaα′for eachα∈I.
(i) It is evident that the uα(Mα) form a direct system of subsets of the Eα′, and we may write uα(Mα)=vα(Mα), where vα is the mapping of Mα onto uα(Mα) whose graph is the same as that of the restriction of uα to Mα. The formula (26) then follows from Proposition 7 because the vα are surjective.
(ii) Let Nα=u−1α(aα′). If α⩽β and xα∈Nα, then
uβ(fβα(xα))=fβα′(uα(xα)=fβα′(aα′)=aβ′;
hence fβα(xα)∈Nβ, and the Nα therefore form a direct system of subsets of the Eα. With the notation of the proof of Proposition 7, consider an element x∈limNα. There exists α∈I and xα∈Nα such that x=fα(xα), so that u(x)=u(fα(xα))=fα′(uα(xα))=fα′(aα′)=a′. Conversely, if x∈u−1(a′) and if x=fα(xα) for some α∈I and some xα∈Eα, then we have a′=u(fα(xα))=fα′(uα(xα))=fα′(aα′). Hence (no. 5, Lemma 1) there exists β⩾α such that fβα′(uα′(xα))=fβα′(aα′)=aβ′; i.e., uα(fβα(xα))=aβ′, and therefore fβα(xα)∈Nβ. Since x=fβ(fβα(xα)), it follows that x∈limNα.
Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.