Bourbaki

Corollary

Tag 03ON, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03ON].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits

Let (Eα,fβα)(\mathrm{E}_\alpha, f_{\beta\alpha}) and (Eα′,fβα′)(\mathrm{E}'_\alpha, f'_{\beta\alpha}) be two direct systems of sets, let (uα)(u_\alpha) be a direct system of mappings uα:Eα→Eα′u_\alpha : \mathrm{E}_\alpha \to \mathrm{E}'_\alpha, and let u=lim→⁡uαu = \varinjlim u_\alpha.

(i) Let (Mα)(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) be a direct system of subsets of the Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha. Then (uα(Mα))(u_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha)) is a direct system of subsets of the Eα′\mathrm{E}'_\alpha, and we have

(26)

lim→⁡uα(Mα)=u (lim→⁡Mα).\varinjlim u_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) = u\,(\varinjlim \mathrm{M}_\alpha).

(ii) Let (aα′)α∈I(a'_\alpha)_{\alpha \in \mathbf{I}} be a family such that aα′∈Eα′a'_\alpha \in \mathrm{E}'_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I} and fβα′(aα′)=aβ′f'_{\beta\alpha}(a'_\alpha) = a'_\beta whenever α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta. Then the sets u−1α(aα′)\overset{-1}{u}_\alpha(a'_\alpha) form a direct system of subsets of the Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha, and we have

(27)

lim→⁡u−1α(aα′)=u−1(a′),\varinjlim \overset{-1}{u}_\alpha(a'_\alpha) = \overset{-1}{u}(a'),

where a′a' is the unique element of lim→⁡Eα′\varinjlim \mathrm{E}'_\alpha which is the canonical image of aα′a'_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I}.

(i) It is evident that the uα(Mα)u_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) form a direct system of subsets of the Eα′\mathrm{E}'_\alpha, and we may write uα(Mα)=vα(Mα)u_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) = v_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha), where vαv_\alpha is the mapping of Mα\mathrm{M}_\alpha onto uα(Mα)u_\alpha(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) whose graph is the same as that of the restriction of uαu_\alpha to Mα\mathrm{M}_\alpha. The formula (26) then follows from Proposition 7 because the vαv_\alpha are surjective.

(ii) Let Nα=u−1α(aα′)\mathrm{N}_\alpha = \overset{-1}{u}_\alpha(a'_\alpha). If α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta and xα∈Nαx_\alpha \in \mathrm{N}_\alpha, then

uβ(fβα(xα))=fβα′(uα(xα)=fβα′(aα′)=aβ′;u_\beta(f_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha)) = f'_{\beta\alpha}(u_\alpha(x_\alpha) = f'_{\beta\alpha}(a'_\alpha) = a'_\beta;

hence fβα(xα)∈Nβf_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha) \in \mathrm{N}_\beta, and the Nα\mathrm{N}_\alpha therefore form a direct system of subsets of the Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha. With the notation of the proof of Proposition 7, consider an element x∈lim→⁡Nαx \in \varinjlim \mathrm{N}_\alpha. There exists α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I} and xα∈Nαx_\alpha \in \mathrm{N}_\alpha such that x=fα(xα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha), so that u(x)=u(fα(xα))=fα′(uα(xα))=fα′(aα′)=a′u(x) = u(f_\alpha(x_\alpha)) = f'_\alpha(u_\alpha(x_\alpha)) = f'_\alpha(a'_\alpha) = a'. Conversely, if x∈u−1(a′)x \in \overset{-1}{u}(a') and if x=fα(xα)x = f_\alpha(x_\alpha) for some α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I} and some xα∈Eαx_\alpha \in \mathrm{E}_\alpha, then we have a′=u(fα(xα))=fα′(uα(xα))=fα′(aα′)a' = u(f_\alpha(x_\alpha)) = f'_\alpha(u_\alpha(x_\alpha)) = f'_\alpha(a'_\alpha). Hence (no. 5, Lemma 1) there exists β⩾α\beta \geqslant \alpha such that fβα′(uα′(xα))=fβα′(aα′)=aβ′f'_{\beta\alpha}(u'_\alpha(x_\alpha)) = f'_{\beta\alpha}(a'_\alpha) = a'_\beta; i.e., uα(fβα(xα))=aβ′u_\alpha(f_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha)) = a'_\beta, and therefore fβα(xα)∈Nβf_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha) \in \mathrm{N}_\beta. Since x=fβ(fβα(xα))x = f_\beta(f_{\beta\alpha}(x_\alpha)), it follows that x∈lim→⁡Nαx \in \varinjlim \mathrm{N}_\alpha.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

  • alg-ii-s6-prop-3 not in this corpus

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.