Bourbaki

Proposition 7

Tag 03RU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 03RU].

Theory of Sets, chapter III, § 7. Inverse limits and direct limits

Let (Eα,fβα)(\mathrm{E}_\alpha, f_{\beta\alpha}) and (Eα′,fβα′)(\mathrm{E}'_\alpha, f'_{\beta\alpha}) be two direct systems of sets relative to I, and for each α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I} let uαu_\alpha be a mapping of Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha into Eα′\mathrm{E}'_\alpha such that the uαu_\alpha form a direct system of mappings. Let u=lim→⁡uαu = \varinjlim u_\alpha. If each uαu_\alpha is injective (resp. surjective) then uu is injective (resp. surjective).

Let E=lim→⁡Eα\mathrm{E} = \varinjlim \mathrm{E}_\alpha, E′=lim→⁡Eα′\mathrm{E}' = \varinjlim \mathrm{E}'_\alpha, and let fα:Eα→Ef_\alpha : \mathrm{E}_\alpha \to \mathrm{E}, fα′:Eα′→E′f'_\alpha : \mathrm{E}'_\alpha \to \mathrm{E}' be the canonical mappings. Suppose that each uαu_\alpha is injective. To show that uu is injective it is enough, by Proposition 6, to verify that if x∈Eαx \in \mathrm{E}_\alpha and y∈Eαy \in \mathrm{E}_\alpha are such that fα′(uα(x))=fα′(uα(y))f'_\alpha(u_\alpha(x)) = f'_\alpha(u_\alpha(y)), then there exists β⩾α\beta \geqslant \alpha such that fβα(x)=fβα(y)f_{\beta\alpha}(x) = f_{\beta\alpha}(y). Now the hypothesis implies (no. 6, Lemma 1) that there exists β⩾α\beta \geqslant \alpha such that

fβα′(uα(x))=fβα′(uα(y)),i.e.,uβ(fβα(x))=uβ(fβα(y)),f'_{\beta\alpha}(u_\alpha(x)) = f'_{\beta\alpha}(u_\alpha(y)), \qquad \text{i.e.,} \qquad u_\beta(f_{\beta\alpha}(x)) = u_\beta(f_{\beta\alpha}(y)),

and hence fβα(x)=fβα(y)f_{\beta\alpha}(x) = f_{\beta\alpha}(y) since uβu_\beta is injective.

Now suppose that the uαu_\alpha are surjective. Then we have

E′=⋃αfα′(Eα′)=⋃αfα′(uα(Eα))=⋃αu(fα(Eα))=u(⋃αfα(Eα))=u(E).\mathrm{E}' = \bigcup_\alpha f'_\alpha(\mathrm{E}'_\alpha) = \bigcup_\alpha f'_\alpha(u_\alpha(\mathrm{E}_\alpha)) = \bigcup_\alpha u(f_\alpha(\mathrm{E}_\alpha)) = u\Big(\bigcup_\alpha f_\alpha(\mathrm{E}_\alpha)\Big) = u(\mathrm{E}).

With the notation of Proposition 7, let Mα\mathrm{M}_\alpha be a subset of Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha for each α∈I\alpha \in \mathrm{I}; if we have fβα(Mα)∈Mβf_{\beta\alpha}(\mathrm{M}_\alpha) \in \mathrm{M}_\beta whenever α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta, the family (Mα)α∈I(\mathrm{M}_\alpha)_{\alpha \in \mathrm{I}} is said to be a direct system of subsets of the Eα\mathrm{E}_\alpha. Let gβαg_{\beta\alpha} (where α⩽β\alpha \leqslant \beta) be the mapping of Mα\mathrm{M}_\alpha into Mβ\mathrm{M}_\beta whose graph is the same as that of the restriction of fβαf_{\beta\alpha} to Mα\mathrm{M}_\alpha. Then it is clear that (Mα,gβα)(\mathrm{M}_\alpha, g_{\beta\alpha}) is a direct system of sets; and Proposition 7, applied to the canonical injections jα:Mα→Eαj_\alpha : \mathrm{M}_\alpha \to \mathrm{E}_\alpha, allows us to identify M=lim→⁡Mα\mathrm{M} = \varinjlim \mathrm{M}_\alpha with a subset of E by means of the injection j=lim→⁡jαj = \varinjlim j_\alpha.

Bourbaki sets the proof directly after the statement, and the corpus does not separate them, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 2004, Springer. Not translated.