If M′vMwM′′ is an exact sequence of left A-modules and if E is an M′′-flat right A-module, the sequence
E⊗AM′1⊗vE⊗AM1⊗wE⊗AM′′
is exact.
We use the notation T(Q) and T(v) in the same sense as in the proof of Lemma 4 of no. 2. We write M1′′=w(M) and let i:M1′′→M′′ be the canonical injection and p the mapping of M to M1′′ with the same graph as w. The sequence M′vMpM1′′→0 is exact and it follows from Lemma 1 of no. 1 that the sequence
T(M′)T(v)T(M)T(p)T(M1′′)⟶0
is exact. Moreover, as E is M′′-flat, the mapping T(i):T(M1′′)→T(M′′) is injective, and as T(i)∘T(p)=T(w), the sequence
T(M′)T(v)T(M)T(w)T(M′′)
is exact. (§ 1, no. 3.)
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.