Let E be a right A-module and M a left A-module such that E is M-flat. If N is either a submodule or a quotient module of M, then E is N-flat.
The case in which N is a submodule is easy, as, if N′ is a submodule of N, the composite homomorphism
E⊗AN′→E⊗AN→E⊗AM
is injective, hence so is E⊗AN′→E⊗AN. Suppose then that N is a quotient module of M, that is there exists an exact sequence 0→RiMpN→0.
Let N′ be a submodule of N and M′=p(N′). Let i′ denote the mapping of R to M′ with the same graph as i, p′ the surjection M→N′ with the same graph as the restriction of p to M′, r the identity mapping of R to R, m the canonical injection M′→M and n the canonical injection N′→N. The diagram
00⟶⟶R↓rRi′iM′↓mMp′pN′↓nN⟶⟶00
is commutative and its rows are exact.
To simplify the writing, we set T(Q)=E⊗AQ for every left A-module Q and T(v)=1E⊗v for every left A-module homomorphism v. The diagram
is commutative and its rows are exact by Lemma 1 of no. 1. Moreover, since E is M-flat, the homomorphism T(m) is injective. As T(r) and T(p′) are surjective, it follows from § 1, no. 4, Corollary 2 to Proposition 2 that T(n) is injective, which proves the lemma.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.