Proposition 5
Tag 042S, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 042S].
Commutative Algebra, chapter I, § 2. Flat modules
Let be an exact sequence of right *-modules. Suppose* is flat. Then, for to be flat it is necessary and sufficient that be flat.
Let be an injective homomorphism of left -modules. Consider the diagram
It is commutative and its rows are exact (no. 1, Lemma 1). Since is flat, l_{E''} \otimes u is injective; moreover, Proposition 4 proves that v \otimes 1_{F'}, and v \otimes 1, are injective. This being so, if E is flat, l_E \otimes u is injective, hence also
it follows that l_{E'} \otimes u is injective and consequently E' is flat. Conversely, if E' is flat, l_{E'} \otimes u is injective; then it follows from § 1, no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2 that l_E \otimes u is injective and so E is flat.
Remarks (1) It is possible for E and E' to be flat without E'' being so, as the example of the \mathbf{Z}-modules E = \mathbf{Z}, E' = n\mathbf{Z}, E'' = \mathbf{Z}/n\mathbf{Z} (n \geq 2), shows. (2) A submodule of a flat module is not necessarily a flat module (Exercise 3).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.