Bourbaki

Remark

Tag 0446, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0446].

Commutative Algebra, chapter I, § 3. Faithfully flat modules

If EE is a faithfully flat AA-module, EE is a faithful AA-module: for, if an element a∈Aa \in A is such that xa=0xa = 0 for all x∈Ex \in E, the homothety h:b↦bah : b \mapsto ba in AA is such that 1,⊗h=01, \otimes h = 0; whence h=0h = 0 by property (c) of Proposition 1, that is a=0a = 0 since AA has a unit element.

Examples (1) The direct sum of a flat module and faithfully flat module is a faithfully flat module by virtue of property (d) of Proposition 1 and § 2, no. 3, Proposition 2. (2) As AA, is faithfully flat by virtue of criterion (d) of Proposition 1 and § 2, no. 4, Example 1, it follows from (1) that every free module not reduced to 0 is faithfully flat. On the other hand, there exist non-zero direct factors of free modules (in other words, non-zero projective modules) which are faithful but not faithfully flat (Exercise 2). (3) Let AA be a principal ideal domain. For an AA-module EE to be faithfully flat, it is necessary and sufficient that it be torsion-free and E≠EpE \neq Ep for every irreducible element (Algebra, Chapter VII, § 1, no. 3) pp of AA; this follows immediately from § 2, no. 4, Proposition 3 and criterion (d) of Proposition 1. (4) Example (3) shows that the Z\mathbf{Z}-module Q\mathbf{Q} is a flat and faithful module, but not faithfully flat.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.