Bourbaki

Proposition 15

Tag 04A5, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04A5].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 4. Spectra of rings and supports of modules

Let AA be a ring, II a finite set and EE the set of orthogonal families (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} of idempotents ei≠0e_i \neq 0 of AA such that ∑i∈Iei=1\sum_{i \in I} e_i = 1. For all (ei)i∈I∈E(e_i)_{i \in I} \in E, we set ω‾((ei)i∈I)=(V(A(1−ei)))i∈I\overline{\omega}((e_i)_{i \in I}) = (\mathrm{V}(A(1 - e_i)))_{i \in I}, σ((ei)i∈I)=(Aei)i∈I\sigma((e_i)_{i \in I}) = (Ae_i)_{i \in I}. Then ω‾\overline{\omega} is a bijection of EE onto the set PP of partitions (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i \in I} of X=Spec(A)X = \mathrm{Spec}(A) into open sets and σ\sigma is a bijection of EE onto the set SS of families (ai)i∈I(a_i)_{i \in I} of ideals ≠0\neq 0 of AA such that AA is the direct sum of the aia_i.

Let (ei)i∈I(e_i)_{i \in I} be an element of EE and set Yi=V(A(1−ei))Y_i = \mathrm{V}(A(1 - e_i)); if i≠ji \neq j, then 1=1−ei+ei(1−ej)∈A(1−ei)+A(1−ej)1 = 1 - e_i + e_i(1 - e_j) \in A(1 - e_i) + A(1 - e_j), whence Yi∩Yj=∅Y_i \cap Y_j = \varnothing (formulae (1) and (2)). On the other hand,

⋃i∈IYi=V(∏i∈IA(1−ei)) \bigcup_{i \in I} Y_i = \mathrm{V}\left( \prod_{i \in I} A(1 - e_i) \right)

(formula (3));

by hypothesis ∏i∈I(1−ei)=1−∑i∈Iei=0\prod_{i \in I} (1 - e_i) = 1 - \sum_{i \in I} e_i = 0, whence ⋃i∈IYi=X\bigcup_{i \in I} Y_i = X (formula (I)). As the YiY_i are closed, they are also open, whence ω‾(E)⊂P\overline{\omega}(E) \subset P. Also, obviously A=∑i∈IAeiA = \sum_{i \in I} Ae_i; if 0=∑i∈Iaiei0 = \sum_{i \in I} a_i e_i where ai∈Aa_i \in A, we obtain, by multiplying by eie_i, O=aiei2=aieiO = a_i e_i^2 = a_i e_i for all ii; this proves that σ(E)⊂S\sigma(E) \subset S.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.