Bourbaki

Proposition 5

Tag 04DA, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DA].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 1. Finitely generated graded algebras

Let a=⨁i≥0aia = \bigoplus_{i \geq 0} a_i be a graded ideal of AA and n0n_0 an integer >0> 0. For there to exist a graded prime ideal p=⨁i≥0pip = \bigoplus_{i \geq 0} p_i such that pn0=a,p_{n_0} = a, for n≥n0,n \geq n_0, it is necessary and sufficient that, for pair of homogeneous elements x,yx, y of degrees ≥n0,\geq n_0, the relation xy∈axy \in a implies '"x∈ax \in a or y∈ay \in a". If there exists n≥n0n \geq n_0 such that an≠An,a_n \neq A_n, the prime ideal satisfying the above conditions is unique.

The condition of the statement is obviously necessary. If an=Ana_n = A_n for all n≥n0,n \geq n_0, clearly every prime ideal containing mm is a solution to the problem; there may therefore be several prime ideals which solve the problem; however, any two of these ideals are obviously equivalent. Suppose then that there exists a homogeneous element a∈Ada \in A_d (with d≥n0d \geq n_0) not belonging to ada_d. Let pp be the set of x∈Ax \in A such that ax∈aax \in a. Clearly pp is an ideal of AA; as the homogeneous components of axax are the products by aa of those of xx and aa is a graded ideal, pp is a graded ideal; moreover, 1∉p1 \notin p and hence p≠Ap \neq A. To prove that pp is prime, it is sufficient to show that, if x∈A, y∈A,x \in A, \ y \in A, satisfy x∉px \notin p and y∉p,y \notin p, then xy∉pxy \notin p (Proposition 4). Then ax∉am+d,ay∉an+d,ax \notin a_{m+d}, ay \notin a_{n+d}, whence by hypothesis

a2xy∉am+n+2d; a^2xy \notin a_{m+n+2d};

we conclude that axy∉am+n+daxy \notin a_{m+n+d} since xy∉pxy \notin p. Finally, if n≥n0n \geq n_0 and x∈An,x \in A_n, the conditions x∈a,x \in a, and ax∈an+dax \in a_{n+d} are equivalent by hypothesis and hence p∩An=anp \cap A_n = a_n which completes the proof of the existence of the graded prime ideal pp which solves the problem. If also p′p' is another graded prime ideal of AA such that p′∩An=anp' \cap A_n = a_n for n≥n0,n \geq n_0, then a∉p′a \notin p' and ax∈p′ax \in p' for all x∈p,x \in p, whence p⊂p′p \subset p' since p′p' is prime. On the other hand, if xx is a homogeneous element of degree n≥0n \geq 0 of p′,p', axax is homogeneous of degree n+d≥n0n + d \geq n_0 and therefore belongs to p′∩An+d=an+dp' \cap A_{n+d} = a_{n+d}, whence by definition x∈px \in p, which shows that p′⊂pp' \subset p and finally p′=pp' = p.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.