Proposition 6
Tag 04DB, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DB].
Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 1. Finitely generated graded algebras
Let d be an integer .
(i) For every essential graded ideal p of A, is an essential graded prime ideal of .
(ii) Conversely, for every essential graded prime ideal of , there exists a unique (necessarily essential) graded prime ideal of A such that .
(i) If does not belong to , does not belong to and hence is essential.
(ii) For all , the set , must be equal to the set of , such that . Let us show that is a graded prime ideal; as when is a multiple of , since is prime, this will prove the uniqueness of . Now, if , , is the sum of terms each of which is a product of or by a homogeneous element of degree and hence and, since is prime, and therefore is a subgroup of . As is an ideal of , is a graded ideal of ; finally, the relation implies or , which completes the proof by virtue of Proposition 4.
Let be a graded commutative ring with positive degrees and an essential graded prime ideal of . The set of homogeneous elements of not belonging to is multiplicative and the ring of fractions is therefore graded canonically (Chapter II, § 2, no. 9) (note that there will in general be homogeneous elements of negative degree in this graduation). We shall denote by the subring of consisting of the homogeneous elements of degree 0, in other words the set of fractions , where and are homogeneous of the same degree in and . Similarly, for every graded -module , is graded canonically (loc. cit.) and we shall denote by the subgroup of homogeneous elements of degree 0, which is obviously an -module.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.