Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 04DS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DS].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules

Let G be a filtered commutative group and H a subgroup of G; let H be given the induced filtration and G/H the quotient filtration. If j : H → G is the canonical injection and p : G → G/H the canonical surjection, j and p are compatible with the filtrations and the sequence

(13)

0⟶gr⁡(H)→gr⁡(j)gr⁡(G)→gr⁡(p)gr⁡(G/H)⟶0 0 \longrightarrow \operatorname{gr}(H) \xrightarrow{\operatorname{gr}(j)} \operatorname{gr}(G) \xrightarrow{\operatorname{gr}(p)} \operatorname{gr}(G/H) \longrightarrow 0
is exact.

The first assertion is obvious; if (G_n) is the filtration on G, then

(H∩Gn)∩Gn+1=H∩Gn+1 (H \cap G_n) \cap G_{n+1} = H \cap G_{n+1}
and hence gr(j) is injective; moreover the canonical mapping
Gn→(H+Gn)/H G_n \to (H + G_n)/H
is surjective, hence so is gr(p) and gr(p) ∘ gr(j) = 0 by (12). Finally, let ξ∈Gn/Gn+1\xi \in G_n/G_{n+1} belong to the kernel of gr(p); then there exists x ∈ ξ such that x ∈ H + G_{n+1}; but as G_{n+1} ⊂ G,
Gn∩(H+Gn+1)=(H∩Gn)+Gn+1 G_n \cap (H + G_{n+1}) = (H \cap G_n) + G_{n+1}
and hence x = y + z where y ∈ H ∩ G, and z ∈ G, +_1; this proves that ξ is the class mod. G, +_1 of j(y), in other words it belongs to the image of gr(H) under gr(j).

Note that, given an exact sequence 0 → G' \xrightarrow{u} G \xrightarrow{v} G'' → 0 of filtered commutative groups, where u and v are compatible with the filtrations, the sequence 0 \longrightarrow \operatorname{gr}(G') \xrightarrow{\operatorname{gr}(u)} \operatorname{gr}(G) \xrightarrow{\operatorname{gr}(v)} \operatorname{gr}(G'') \longrightarrow 0 is not necessarily exact (Exercise 4).

If now A and B are two filtered rings and h: A → B a ring homomorphism which is compatible with the filtrations, it is immediately verified that the graded group homomorphism gr(h): gr(A) → gr(B) is also a ring homomorphism. In particular, if A' is a subring of A with the induced filtration, gr(A') is canonically identified with a graded subring of gr(A) (Proposition 2); if b is a two-sided ideal of A and A/b is given the quotient filtration, gr(A/b) is canonically identified with the quotient graded ring gr(A)/gr(b) (Proposition 2).

Finally, let A be a filtered ring, E, F two filtered A-modules and u : E → F an homomorphism compatible with the filtrations. Then it is immediate that gr(u) : gr(E) → gr(F) is a gr(A)-linear mapping and hence a homogeneous homomorphism of degree 0 of graded gr(A)-modules. Moreover, if u' : E → F is another A-homomorphism compatible with the filtrations, so is u + u' and

gr⁡(u+u′)=gr⁡(u)+gr⁡(u′). \operatorname{gr}(u + u') = \operatorname{gr}(u) + \operatorname{gr}(u').

Remarks

(1) Clearly filtered ring homomorphisms (resp. homomorphisms of filtered modules over a given filtered ring A) compatible with the filtrations can be taken as morphisms for the filtered ring structure (resp. filtered A-module structure) (Set Theory, Chapter IV, § 2, no. 1).

(2) Let E and F be two modules over a filtered ring A and let them have the filtrations derived from the filtration (A_n) on A (no. 1, Example 2). Then every A-linear mapping u : E → F is compatible with the filtrations, since

u(AnE)=Anu(E)⊂AnF. u(A_nE) = A_nu(E) \subset A_nF.

(3) Note that a filtered A-module homomorphism u : E → F which is compatible with the filtrations may satisfy gr(u) = 0 without being zero; this is so for example of the endomorphism x ↦ nx of the additive group Z\mathbf{Z} with the (n)-adic filtration (for any integer n > 1). The relation gr(u) = gr(v) for two homomorphisms u, v of E to F, compatible with the filtrations, does not therefore imply necessarily u = u.

(4) The definitions at the beginning of this no. extend immediately to two groups G, G', which are not necessarily commutative and are filtered by subgroups Gn,Gn′G_n, G'_n such that Gn+1G_{n+1} (resp. Gn+1′G'_{n+1}) is normal in G, (resp. Gn′G'_n). Proposition 2 is also valid with the same hypotheses on the G, and assuming that H is invariant in G, the proof remaining unchanged except for notation.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.