Bourbaki

Proposition 6

Tag 04DZ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04DZ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 2. General results on filtered rings and modules

With the above notation, suppose that a0=Aa_0 = A and let hh denote the mapping P↦(αe,P)e∈NsP \mapsto (\alpha_{e,P})_{e \in \mathbf{N}^s}. Then hh is an isomorphism of the additive topological group AA onto the additive topological group ANsA^{\mathbf{N}^s}. The polynomial ring A[X1,…,Xs]A[X_1, \ldots, X_s] is dense in A′A'; if AA is complete, so is A′A'.

Clearly hh is bijective; Vn=h(an′)V_n = h(a'_n) is the set of (ae)∈ANs(a_e) \in A^{\mathbf{N}^s} such that ae∈an−∣e∣a_e \in a_{n-|e|} for all e∈Nse \in \mathbf{N}^s such that ∣e∣≤n|e| \leq n; as these elements ee are finite in number, VnV_n is a neighbourhood of 0 in ANsA^{\mathbf{N}^s}. Conversely, if VV is a neighbourhood of 0 in ANsA^{\mathbf{N}^s}, there is a finite subset EE of Ns\mathbf{N}^s and an integer vv such that the conditions ae∈ava_e \in a_v for all e∈Ee \in E imply (ae)∈V(a_e) \in V; if then nn is the greatest of the integers v+∣e∣v + |e| for e∈Ee \in E, then h(an′)⊂Vh(a'_n) \subset V, which proves the first assertion of Proposition 6.

Moreover, with nn and EE defined as above, h(P−∑e∈Eαe,PXe)∈Vh(P - \sum_{e \in E} \alpha_{e,P}X^e) \in V for all P∈A′P \in A', which shows that A[X1,…,Xs]A[X_1, \ldots, X_s] is dense in A′A'. The last assertion follows from the first and the fact that a product of complete spaces is complete.

Let mm be an ideal of AA and suppose that (ai)(a_i) is the mm-adic filtration; then, if nn is the ideal of A′A' generated by mm and the XiX_i (1≤i≤s1 \leq i \leq s), the filtration (ai)(a_i) is the nn-adic filtration. For clearly, for all k≥0k \geq 0, nkn^k is generated by the elements aXeaX^e such that a∈mk−∣e∣a \in m^{k-|e|} for all e∈Nse \in \mathbf{N}^s such that ∣e∣≤k|e| \leq k, whence nk⊂a&n^k \subset a \&. Let us prove conversely that ak′⊂nka'_k \subset n^k. For all P∈ak′P \in a'_k, P=P′+P′′P = P' + P'', where P′=∑∣e∣<kαe,PXeP' = \sum_{|e| < k} \alpha_{e,P}X^e, P′′=∑∣e∣≥kαe,PXeP'' = \sum_{|e| \geq k} \alpha_{e,P}X^e. Clearly it is possible to write P′′=∑∣e∣=kXeQeP'' = \sum_{|e|=k} X^e Q_e, where the QeQ_e are elements of A′A', whence P′′∈nkP'' \in n^k; on the other hand, clearly αe,PXe∈nk\alpha_{e,P}X^e \in n^k for all e∈Nse \in \mathbf{N}^s, whence P′∈nkP' \in n^k. Then nk=ak′n^k = a'_k.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.