Proposition 8
Tag 0525, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0525].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 3. Factorial domains
Let C be a ring which is either a field or a discrete valuation ring. Then the domain of formal power series is factorial.
Let be the maximal ideal of C and a generator of (if C is a field, then ). Let C be given the -adic topology, which is Hausdorff. As C is a Noetherian local ring, is a Noetherian local ring and its completion is (Chapter III, §2, no. 6, Proposition 6). By the Corollary to Proposition 4 (no. 6), it suffices to prove that is factorial. Now, if C is a field, then ; if C is a discrete valuation ring, the same is true of (Chapter VI, §5, no. 3, Proposition 5). We shall therefore assume in the remainder of the proof that C is complete.
Arguing by induction starting with the trivial case , we shall assume that it has been proved that is factorial. We shall identify B with and denote by m the maximal ideal of A (generated by ). We shall prove that every non-zero element g of B is, in an essentially unique way, a product of extremal elements.
Let K be the field ; as is identified with , the ideal is prime and is extremal. If , is therefore the ring of a normed discrete valuation w (Chapter VI, §3, no. 6, Proposition 9); every non-zero element g of B may therefore be written as , where and f is not a multiple of . It will therefore suffice to show that is an essentially unique product of extremal elements. Now the canonical image of in is not zero; Lemma 3 (no. 7) therefore shows that there exists an automorphism of B which maps to an element such that the coefficients of are not all in ; this means that the coefficients of the series , considered as a formal power series in , are not all in m. It will suffice to prove our assertion for .
In what follows, all the elements of B will be considered as formal power series in with coefficients in A. By Proposition 6 of no. 8 (applicable since C and therefore A are separable and complete and the reduced series off' is ), is associated, in B, with a unique distinguished polynomial F. By Proposition 7 of no. 8, every series which divides (or, what amounts to the same, which divides F) is associated with a distinguished polynomial which divides F and every decomposition off' is, to within invertible factors, of the form , where is invertible and the are extremal distinguished polynomials (in B) such that . By the Corollary to Proposition 7 of no. 8, the are also extremal in . Now, as is factorial by the induction hypothesis, so is (Theorem 2, no. 5); hence, since they are monic, the are uniquely determined by (up to a permutation). This shows the uniqueness of the decomposition ; its existence follows from the fact that is Noetherian, which completes the proof.
Remarks (1) There exist factorial rings such that the ring is not factorial (Exercise 8). However, if is a principal ideal domain, is factorial (Exercise 9). (2) \* We shall see later, by homological methods, that every regular local ring is factorial (cf. § 4, no. 7, Corollary 3 to Proposition 16). This will give another proof, conceptually simpler, of Proposition 8. \*
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.