If the linearly topologized commutative ring A is Hausdorff and complete, the canonical homomorphism π is a topological ring isomorphism.
For all (n1,…,n)∈Np and all 3∈B, let ϕn1…np3 be the mapping (A/J)[X1,…,Xp]→A/J which maps every polynomial to the coefficient of X1n1…Xpnp in this polynomial; clearly the ϕn1…np3 form an inverse system of (A/J)-module homomorphisms (relative to the ordered set B) and, as A is canonically identified with lim←(A/J) by hypothesis, ϕn1…np=lim←ϕn1…np3 is a continuous A-homomorphism from A′ to A. For every element S=(SJ)J∈B of A′, we shall see that the formal power series T=∑(ni)ϕn1…np(S)X1n1…Xpnp is restricted and satisfies π(T)=S. For all 3∈B and all J′∈B such that J′⊂J, the relation ϕn1…npJ′(SJ′)=0 implies
ϕn1…npJ′(SJ′)∈J/J′ as
SJ is a polynomial, we see that
ϕn1…np(S)∈J except for those
(n1,…,np), finite in number, such that
ϕn1…npJ(SJ)=0, which proves our first assertion; the second follows from the definitions. As
A is Hausdorff, the intersection of the
NJ reduces to 0 and hence
π is
bijective, which completes the proof, since
π is a strict morphism.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.