Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 04HY, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04HY].

Commutative Algebra, chapter III, § 4. Lifting in complete rings

If the linearly topologized commutative ring A\mathbf{A} is Hausdorff and complete, the canonical homomorphism π\pi is a topological ring isomorphism.

For all (n1,…,n)∈Np(n_1, \ldots, n) \in \mathbf{N}^p and all 3∈B3 \in \mathscr{B}, let ϕn1…np3\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^3 be the mapping (A/J)[X1,…,Xp]→A/J(A/\mathfrak{J})[X_1, \ldots, X_p] \to A/\mathfrak{J} which maps every polynomial to the coefficient of X1n1…XpnpX_1^{n_1} \ldots X_p^{n_p} in this polynomial; clearly the ϕn1…np3\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^3 form an inverse system of (A/J)(A/\mathfrak{J})-module homomorphisms (relative to the ordered set B\mathscr{B}) and, as AA is canonically identified with lim⁡←(A/J)\lim_{\leftarrow} (A/\mathfrak{J}) by hypothesis, ϕn1…np=lim⁡←ϕn1…np3\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p} = \lim_{\leftarrow} \phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^3 is a continuous AA-homomorphism from A′A' to AA. For every element S=(SJ)J∈BS = (S_\mathfrak{J})_{\mathfrak{J} \in \mathscr{B}} of A′A', we shall see that the formal power series T=∑(ni)ϕn1…np(S)X1n1…XpnpT = \sum_{(n_i)} \phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}(S) X_1^{n_1} \ldots X_p^{n_p} is restricted and satisfies π(T)=S\pi(T) = S. For all 3∈B3 \in \mathscr{B} and all J′∈B\mathfrak{J}' \in \mathscr{B} such that J′⊂J\mathfrak{J}' \subset \mathfrak{J}, the relation ϕn1…npJ′(SJ′)=0\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^{\mathfrak{J}'}(S_{\mathfrak{J}'}) = 0 implies

ϕn1…npJ′(SJ′)∈J/J′ \phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^{\mathfrak{J}'}(S_{\mathfrak{J}'}) \in \mathfrak{J}/\mathfrak{J}'
as SJS_{\mathfrak{J}} is a polynomial, we see that ϕn1…np(S)∈J\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}(S) \in \mathfrak{J} except for those (n1,…,np)(n_1, \ldots, n_p), finite in number, such that ϕn1…npJ(SJ)≠0\phi_{n_1 \ldots n_p}^{\mathfrak{J}}(S_{\mathfrak{J}}) \neq 0, which proves our first assertion; the second follows from the definitions. As AA is Hausdorff, the intersection of the NJ\mathbf{N}_\mathfrak{J} reduces to 0 and hence π\pi is bijective, which completes the proof, since π\pi is a strict morphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.