*Let A be a ring and m an ideal of A such that the ordered pair (A,m) satisfies Hensel’s conditions. Let B be the quotient ring A/m and π:A→B the canonical homomorphism. If B is the direct composition of a finite family (bi)i∈I of ideals, there exists a unique family (ai)i∈I of ideals of A such that π(ai)=bi for all i∈I and A is the direct composition of the family (ai).
Let I=∑ici where ci∈bi for all i; the ci are idempotents of B such that cicj=0 for i=j. By Lemma 2 there therefore exist idempotents ei of A (i∈I) such that π(ei)=ci for all i; as eiej is an idempotent such that
π(eiej)=cicj=0 for
i=j,
eiej=0 for
i=j (Lemma 2); as
1−∑iei is an idempotent such that
π(1−i∑ei)=1−i∑ci=0, similarly
1=∑iei. It follows that
A is the direct composition of the ideals
ai=eiA and that
π(ai)=π(ei)B=bi.
It remains to show the uniqueness of such a decomposition. Now, suppose that A is the direct composition of another family (ai′)i∈I of ideals such that π(ai′)=bi for all i; then 1=∑iei′ where ei′∈ai′, whence, in B, 1=∑iπ(ei′) where π(ei′)∈bi, which implies π(ei′)=ci; as ei′ and ei are idempotents, necessarily ei′=ei (Lemma 2), which completes the proof.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.