Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 04MJ, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04MJ].

Commutative Algebra, chapter IV, § 3. Primary decomposition in graded modules

Let AA be a torsion-free commutative group, AA a graded ring of type AA and MM a graded AA-module of type AA. Every prime ideal associated with MM is graded and is the annihilator of a homogeneous element of MM.

We know that AA can be given a total order structure compatible with its group structure (Algebra, Chapter II, § 11, no. 4, Lemma 2). Let pp be a prime ideal associated with MM, the annihilator of an element x∈Mx \in M, and let (xi)i∈Δ(x_i)_{i \in \Delta} be the family of homogeneous components of xx; let i(1)<i(2)<⋯<i(r)i(1) < i(2) < \cdots < i(r) be the values of ii for which xi≠0x_i \neq 0. Consider an element a∈pa \in p and let (ai)i∈Δ(a_i)_{i \in \Delta} be the family of its homogeneous components; we shall prove that a,∈pa, \in p for all i∈Ai \in A, which will show that pp is a graded ideal.

We argue by induction on the number of indices ii such that a,≠0a, \neq 0. Our assertion is obvious if this number is 0; if not, let mm be the greatest of the indices ii for which a,≠0a, \neq 0; if we prove that a,∈pa, \in p, the induction hypothesis applied to a−a,a - a, will give the conclusion. Now, ax=0ax = 0; for all j∈Aj \in A, using the fact that the homogeneous component of degree m+jm + j of axax is 0, we obtain

∑i∈Δam−ixj+i=0; \sum_{i \in \Delta} a_{m-i} x_{j+i} = 0;
we conclude that amxja_m x_j is a linear combination of the xix_i of indices i>ji > j. In particular therefore amxi(r)=0a_m x_{i(r)} = 0, whence, by descending induction on n<rn < r, amr−n+1xi(n)=0a_m^{r-n+1} x_{i(n)} = 0. Then amrx=0a_m^r x = 0, whence amr∈pa_m^r \in p and, as pp is prime, a,∈pa, \in p.

We now show that pp is the annihilator of a homogeneous element of MM. Let us write bn=Ann⁡(xi(n))b_n = \operatorname{Ann}(x_{i(n)}) for 1≤n≤r1 \leq n \leq r. For every homogeneous element bb of pp and all nn the homogeneous component of bxbx of degree i(n)+deg⁡(b)i(n) + \deg(b) is bxi(n)bx_{i(n)}, hence bxi(n)=0bx_{i(n)} = 0 and therefore b∈6b \in 6; as pp is generated by its homogeneous elements, p⊂6p \subset 6. On the other hand, clearly ⋂n=1r6n⊂Ann⁡(x)=p\bigcap_{n=1}^r 6_n \subset \operatorname{Ann}(x) = p; as pp is prime, there exists an nn such that bn⊂pb_n \subset p (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 1), whence bn=P=Ann⁡(xi(n))b_n = P = \operatorname{Ann}(x_{i(n)}), which completes the proof.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.