Bourbaki

Definition 5

Tag 04NU, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04NU].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 1. Notion of an integral element

An integral domain AA is called completely integrally closed if the following condition is satisfied: every element xx of the field of fractions KK of AA such that all the powers xnx^n (n⩾0n \geqslant 0) are contained in a finitely generated sub-A-module of KK, belongs to AA.

Note that the hypothesis that the xnx^n are contained in a finitely generated sub-A-module of KK can also be expressed by saying that there exists a non-zero element d∈Ad \in A such that dxn∈Adx^n \in A for all n⩾0n \geqslant 0; for the latter condition means that xn∈Ad−1x^n \in Ad^{-1}; and conversely, if (bi)1⩽i⩽m(b_i)_{1 \leqslant i \leqslant m} is a finite sequence of elements of KK, there exists d∈Ad \in A such that dbi∈Adb_i \in A for 1⩽i⩽m1 \leqslant i \leqslant m, whence dM⊂AdM \subset A for the sub-A-module MM of KK generated by the bib_i.

Clearly a completely integrally closed domain is integrally closed; conversely, the Corollary to Proposition 1 of no. 1 shows that an integrally closed Noetherian domain is completely integrally closed. \* On the other hand, the ring of a valuation of height ⩾2\geqslant 2 (Chapter VI, § 4, no. 4) is integrally closed but not completely integrally closed. \* If (Ai)(A_i) is a family of completely integrally closed domains with the same field of fractions KK, A=⋂iAiA = \bigcap_i A_i is completely integrally closed. For if x∈Kx \in K is such that for some non-zero dd in AA, dxndx^n belongs to AA for all n>0n > 0, the hypothesis implies that x∈Ax \in A, for all ii and hence x∈Ax \in A.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.