Bourbaki

Lemma 2

Tag 04PM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04PM].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 2. The lift of prime ideals

Let BB be an integral domain and AA a subring of BB such that BB is integral over AA. For BB to be a field, it is necessary and sufficient that AA be a field.

If AA is a field, then, for ally ≠0\neq 0 in BB, A[y]A[y] is by hypothesis (§1§ 1, Theorem 1) a finitely generated AA-module; as A[y]A[y] is an integral domain, it is a field (Algebra, Chapter V, § 2, no. 1, Proposition 1) and a fortiori yy is invertible in BB and hence BB is a field. Conversely, suppose that BB is a field and let z≠0z \neq 0 in AA; as z−1∈Bz^{-1} \in B, z−1z^{-1} is integral over AA, in other words there is an equation of integral dependence

z−n+a1z−(n−1)+…+an=0 z^{-n} + a_1 z^{-(n-1)} + \ldots + a_n = 0

where the ai∈Aa_i \in A; now this relation shows that

−z−1=a1+a2z+…+anzn−1∈A, -z^{-1} = a_1 + a_2 z + \ldots + a_n z^{n-1} \in A,

hence AA is certainly a field.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.