Let A′ be a ring, G a group operating on A′, A the ring of invariants of G, p′ a prime ideal of A′ and S a multiplicative subset of A not meeting p′. Then GZ(S−1p′)=GZ(p′), GΓ(S−1p′)=GΓ(p′) and, if G is locally finite, S−1AZ(p′)=AZ(S−1p′) and S−1AΓ(p′)=AΓ(S−1p′).
As the elements of S are invariant under G, clearly, if σ.p′=p′, also σ.(S−1p′)=S−1p′. Conversely, suppose that σ∈G is such that σ.(S−1p′)=S−1p′; then, if x∈p′, (σ.x)/1∈S−1p′ and there therefore exists s∈S such that s(σ.x)∈p′, whence σ.x∈p′ since p′ is prime and s∈/p′; this proves that σ.p′⊂p′ and it can be similarly shown that σ−1.p′⊂p′, hence σ.p′=p′ and σ∈GZ(p′). If σ∈GΓ(p′), then σ.x−x∈p′ for all x∈A′, hence also, for all s∈S,
σ.(x/s)−(x/s)=(O.x−x)/s∈S−1p′
and therefore σ∈GΓ(S−1p′). Conversely, suppose that σ∈GΓ(S−1p′); then, for all x∈A′, σ.(x/1)−(x/1)∈S−1p′ and therefore there exists s∈S such that s(σ.x−x)∈p′, whence as above σ.x−x∈p′, which proves that σ∈GΓ(p′). The last two assertions follow from § 1, no. 9, Proposition 23.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.