Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 04Q2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04Q2].

Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 2. The lift of prime ideals

Let A′A' be a ring, G\mathscr{G} a finite group operating on A′A' and AA the ring of invariants of G\mathscr{G}, so that A′A' is integral over AA (§ 1, no. 9, Proposition 22).

(i) Given two prime ideals p′,q′p', q' of A′A' lying above the same prime ideal pp of AA, there exists σ∈G\sigma \in \mathscr{G} such that q′=σ.p′q' = \sigma.p'; in other words, G\mathscr{G} operates transitively on the set of prime ideals of A′A' lying above pp.

(ii) Let p′p' be a prime ideal of A′A', p=p′∩Ap = p' \cap A and kk (resp. k′k') the field of fractions of A/pA/p (resp. A′/p′A'/p'). Then k′k' is a quasi-Galois extension () of kk and the canonical homomorphism σ↦σˉ\sigma \mapsto \bar{\sigma} from GZ(p′)\mathscr{G}^{\mathbf{Z}}(p') to the group Γ\Gamma of kk-automorphisms of k′k' defines, by taking the quotient, an isomorphism of GZ(p′)/GΓ(p′)\mathscr{G}^{\mathbf{Z}}(p')/\mathscr{G}^{\Gamma}(p') onto Γ\Gamma.*

(*) In order to avoid confusion with other meanings of the word "normal" we henceforth use the term "quasi-Galois extension" as synonymous with the term "normal extension" defined in Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 2, Definition 2.

(i) If x∈qx \in \mathfrak{q} then ∏σ∈Gσ.x∈q′∩A=p⊂p′\prod_{\sigma \in \mathscr{G}} \sigma.x \in q' \cap A = p \subset p'; then there exists σ∈G\sigma \in \mathscr{G} such that σ.x∈p′\sigma.x \in p', that is x∈σ−1.q′x \in \sigma^{-1}.q'. We conclude that q′⊂⋃σ∈Gs.p′q' \subset \bigcup_{\sigma \in \mathscr{G}} \mathfrak{s}.\mathfrak{p}' and hence (since G\mathscr{G} is finite and the s.p′\mathfrak{s}.\mathfrak{p}' prime) there exists σ∈G\sigma \in \mathscr{G} such that q′⊂s.p′\mathfrak{q}' \subset \mathfrak{s}.\mathfrak{p}' (Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2); as q′q' and σ.p′\sigma.\mathfrak{p}' both lie above pp, q′=σ.p′q' = \sigma.\mathfrak{p}' (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 1).

(ii) To see that k′k' is a quasi-Galois extension of kk, it suffices to prove that every element xˉ∈A′/p′\bar{x} \in A'/p' is a root of a polynomial PP in k[X]k[X] all of whose roots are in A′/p′A'/p' (Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Proposition 9). Now, let x∈A′x \in A' be a representative of the class xˉ\bar{x}; the polynomial Q(X)=∏σ∈G(X−σ.x)Q(X) = \prod_{\sigma \in \mathscr{G}} (X - \sigma.x) has all its coefficients in AA; let P(X)P(X) be the polynomial in (A/p)[X](A/p)[X] whose coefficients are the images of those of QQ under the canonical homomorphism π:A→A/p\pi : A \to A/p. As π\pi may be considered as the restriction to AA of the canonical homomorphism π′:A′→A′/p′\pi' : A' \to A'/p', it is seen that PP is the product in (A′/p′)[X](A'/p')[X] of the linear factors X−π′(σ.x)X - \pi'(\sigma.x) and therefore solves the problem since xˉ=π′(x)\bar{x} = \pi'(x).

Clearly, for all σ∈Gz\sigma \in \mathscr{G}^z, σ^\hat{\sigma} is a kk-automorphism of k′k'; it remains to verify that σ↦σ^\sigma \mapsto \hat{\sigma} maps Gz\mathscr{G}^z onto the group of all kk-automorphisms of k′k'. Let us write S=A−pS = A - p; kk and k′k' are not changed by replacing A′A' and p′p' by S−1A′S^{-1}A' and S−1p′S^{-1}p' respectively, by virtue of § 1, no. 9, Proposition 23 and the relation S−1p′∩S−1A=S−1(A∩p′)=S−1pS^{-1}p' \cap S^{-1}A = S^{-1}(A \cap p') = S^{-1}p (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 4); it follows from Lemma 3 that neither Gz\mathscr{G}^z nor its operation on k′k' is changed; we may therefore restrict our attention to the case where pp is maximal, in which case we know that so is p′p' (no. 1, Proposition 1) and every element of k′k' is therefore of the form π′(x)\pi'(x) for some x∈A′x \in A'; it has been seen above that such an element is a root of a polynomial in k[X]k[X] of degree ≤Card(G)\leq \mathrm{Card}(\mathscr{G}). As every finite separable extension of kk admits a primitive element (Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 7, Proposition 12 and § 11, no. 4, Proposition 4), it is seen that every finite separable extension of kk contained in k′k' is of degree ≤Card(G)\leq \mathrm{Card}(\mathscr{G}), whence it follows that the greatest separable extension ks′k'_s of kk contained in k′k' (Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 6, Proposition 11) is of degree ≤Card(G)\leq \mathrm{Card}(\mathscr{G}) (Algebra, Chapter V, § 3, no. 2, Remark 2). Let y∈A′y \in A' be an element such that π′(y)\pi'(y) is a primitive element of ks′k'_s. The ideals σ.p′\sigma.p' for σ∈G−Gz\sigma \in \mathscr{G} - \mathscr{G}^z are maximal and distinct from p′p' by definition; there therefore exists x∈A′x \in A' such that x≡y(modp′)x \equiv y \pmod{p'} and x∈σ−1p′x \in \sigma^{-1}p' for σ∈G−Gz\sigma \in \mathscr{G} - \mathscr{G}^z (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 2, Proposition 5). This being so, let uu be a kk-automorphism of k′k' and let P(X)=∏σ∈G(X−π′(σ.x))P(X) = \prod_{\sigma \in \mathscr{G}} (X - \pi'(\sigma.x)); as π′(x)\pi'(x) is a root of PP and P∈k[X]P \in k[X], u(π′(x))u(\pi'(x)) is also a root of PP in k′k' and hence there exists τ∈G\tau \in \mathscr{G} such that

u(π′(x))=π′(τ.x); u(\pi'(x)) = \pi'(\tau.x);

but u(π′(x))≠0u(\pi'(x)) \neq 0 and, for σ∈G−Gz\sigma \in \mathscr{G} - \mathscr{G}^z, σ.x∈p′\sigma.x \in p' and hence π′(σ.x)=0\pi'(\sigma.x) = 0; we conclude that necessarily τ∈Gz\tau \in \mathscr{G}^z. But as uu and τ~\tilde{\tau} have the same value for the primitive element π′(y)=π′(x)\pi'(y) = \pi'(x) of ks′k'_s, they coincide on ks′k'_s and, as k′k' is a radicial extension of ks′k'_s, they coincide on k′k'.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.