Theorem 2
Tag 04Q2, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04Q2].
Commutative Algebra, chapter V, § 2. The lift of prime ideals
Let be a ring, a finite group operating on and the ring of invariants of , so that is integral over (§ 1, no. 9, Proposition 22).
(i) Given two prime ideals of lying above the same prime ideal of , there exists such that ; in other words, operates transitively on the set of prime ideals of lying above .
(ii) Let be a prime ideal of , and (resp. ) the field of fractions of (resp. ). Then is a quasi-Galois extension () of and the canonical homomorphism from to the group of -automorphisms of defines, by taking the quotient, an isomorphism of onto .*
(*) In order to avoid confusion with other meanings of the word "normal" we henceforth use the term "quasi-Galois extension" as synonymous with the term "normal extension" defined in Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 2, Definition 2.
(i) If then ; then there exists such that , that is . We conclude that and hence (since is finite and the prime) there exists such that (Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2); as and both lie above , (no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 1).
(ii) To see that is a quasi-Galois extension of , it suffices to prove that every element is a root of a polynomial in all of whose roots are in (Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 3, Corollary 3 to Proposition 9). Now, let be a representative of the class ; the polynomial has all its coefficients in ; let be the polynomial in whose coefficients are the images of those of under the canonical homomorphism . As may be considered as the restriction to of the canonical homomorphism , it is seen that is the product in of the linear factors and therefore solves the problem since .
Clearly, for all , is a -automorphism of ; it remains to verify that maps onto the group of all -automorphisms of . Let us write ; and are not changed by replacing and by and respectively, by virtue of § 1, no. 9, Proposition 23 and the relation (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 4); it follows from Lemma 3 that neither nor its operation on is changed; we may therefore restrict our attention to the case where is maximal, in which case we know that so is (no. 1, Proposition 1) and every element of is therefore of the form for some ; it has been seen above that such an element is a root of a polynomial in of degree . As every finite separable extension of admits a primitive element (Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 7, Proposition 12 and § 11, no. 4, Proposition 4), it is seen that every finite separable extension of contained in is of degree , whence it follows that the greatest separable extension of contained in (Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 6, Proposition 11) is of degree (Algebra, Chapter V, § 3, no. 2, Remark 2). Let be an element such that is a primitive element of . The ideals for are maximal and distinct from by definition; there therefore exists such that and for (Chapter 11, § 1, no. 2, Proposition 5). This being so, let be a -automorphism of and let ; as is a root of and , is also a root of in and hence there exists such that
but and, for , and hence ; we conclude that necessarily . But as and have the same value for the primitive element of , they coincide on and, as is a radicial extension of , they coincide on .
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
- Corollary 3, § 2
- Definition 5, § 2
- Corollary, § 2
- Proposition 4, § 2
- Corollary 1, § 2
- Proposition 5, § 2
- Proposition 6, § 2
- Exercise 8, § 8
- Exercise 9, § 8
Cites
- Chapter II, § 1, no. 1, Proposition 2
- § 1, no. 9, Proposition 22
- § 1, no. 9, Proposition 23
- § 1, no. 2, Proposition 5
- § 2, no. 4
- Lemma 3
- Proposition 1
- no. 1, Proposition 1
- § 11, no. 4, Proposition 4
- Algebra, Chapter V, § 3, no. 2, Remark 2
- Algebra, Chapter V, § 6, no. 2, Definition 2
- Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 6, Proposition 11
- Algebra, Chapter V, § 7, no. 7, Proposition 12