Let A′ be an integral domain, G a finite commutative group operating on A′, A the ring of invariants of G, p a prime ideal of A and K and K′ the fields of fractions of A and A′ respectively. Then the prime ideals of A′ lying above p all have the same decomposition ring AZ and the field of fractions KZ of AZ is the greatest intermediate field between K and K′ in which p decomposes completely.
If p′ is a prime ideal of A′ lying above p, then GZ(σ.p′)=GZ(p′) since G is commutative (formula (2)), hence (Theorem 2 (i)) all the prime ideals of A′ lying above p have the same decomposition group GZ and therefore the same decomposition ring AZ; their number is (G:GZ). Let L be an intermediate field between K and K′ and let H be the subgroup of G leaving invariant the elements of L; the decomposition group of p′ with respect to H is GZ∩H; as A′∩L is the ring of invariants of H in A′, the number of prime ideals of A′ lying above p′∩L is (H:(GZ∩H))=(HGZ:GZ) (since G is commutative). The number of prime ideals of A′∩L lying above p is therefore (G:HGZ). For p to decompose completely in L, it is necessary and sufficient therefore that (G:HGZ)=[L:K]=(G:H) and, as H⊂HGZ, this is equivalent to HGZ=H or also to GZ⊂H and finally to L⊂KZ.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.