Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 04UC, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04UC].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VI, § 4. The height of a valuation

Let G be a totally ordered group not reduced to O. The following conditions are equivalent: (a) G is of height 1; (b) for all x > 0 and y ≥ 0 in G, there exists an integer n ≥ 0 such that y ≤ nx; (c) G is isomorphic to a subgroup of the ordered additive group \mathbf{R} which is not reduced to O.

Let x be a positive element of G and let H, be the set of y ∈ G such that there exists an integer n ≥ 0 satisfying |y| ≤ nx. It is easily verified that H, is an isolated subgroup of G and that every isolated subgroup of G containing x contains H,. Condition (a) is therefore equivalent to “H, = G for all x > 0”, that is, to condition (b).

Clearly (c) implies (b). Conversely, suppose condition (b) holds and let Q denote the set of elements >0 of G. Suppose first that Q has a least element x; for all y ∈ Q, let n be the least integer such that y ≤ nx; if y < nx, then also nx − y ≥ x, whence y ≤ (n − 1)x contrary to the choice of n; then y = nx, which shows that G = \mathbf{Z}x is isomorphic to \mathbf{Z} ⊂ \mathbf{R}. Suppose now that Q has no least element; we apply to the ordered set P = Q ∪ (0) Proposition 1 of General Topology, Chapter V, § 2 (which is possible, since condition (b) is just “Archimedes’ axiom”); it is seen that there exists a strictly increasing mapping f of P to \mathbf{R}_+ such that

f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y)

for x ∈ P and y ∈ P; by linearity f can be extended to an isomorphism of G onto a subgroup of \mathbf{R}, which proves that (b) implies (c).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.