Lemma 1
Tag 04YX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YX].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains
If is a Krull domain and , is a family of normed valuations on satisfying (AK), (AK) and (AK), the mapping is a decreasing injective mapping of the set of divisorial integer ideals of (ordered by ) to the set of positive elements & the ordered group the direct sum .
This being so, every non-empty set of positive elements of has a minimal element (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 13, Theorem 2). Hence certainly satisfies property (b) of the statement.
Conversely, let be an integral domain satisfying properties (a) and (b) of the statement. Since is completely integrally closed, is an ordered group (no. 2, Theorem 1). This group is a lattice (no. 1, Proposition 2). By condition (b) of the statement, every non-empty family of positive elements of has a minimal element. Let be the set of extremal elements of . Then (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 13, Theorem 2) is a basis of the -module and the positive elements of are the linear combinations with positive integer coefficients of the elements of .
Thus, for , rational integers are defined (for ) by writing:
We also write .
From the relations
and
for and in , we deduce that the are discrete valuations on . In order that , it is necessary and sufficient that , that is that for all . Thus the satisfy conditions (AK) and (AK) and obviously also (AK).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.