Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 04YX, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YX].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains

If AA is a Krull domain and (vt)t(v_t)_t, is a family of normed valuations on KK satisfying (AKI_I), (AKII_{II}) and (AKIII_{III}), the mapping a↦(vt(a))t∈Ia \mapsto (v_t(a))_{t \in I} is a decreasing injective mapping of the set of divisorial integer ideals of AA (ordered by ⊂\subset) to the set of positive elements & the ordered group the direct sum Z(I)\mathbf{Z}^{(I)}.

This being so, every non-empty set of positive elements of Z(I)\mathbf{Z}^{(I)} has a minimal element (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 13, Theorem 2). Hence AA certainly satisfies property (b) of the statement.

Conversely, let AA be an integral domain satisfying properties (a) and (b) of the statement. Since AA is completely integrally closed, D(A)D(A) is an ordered group (no. 2, Theorem 1). This group is a lattice (no. 1, Proposition 2). By condition (b) of the statement, every non-empty family of positive elements of D(A)D(A) has a minimal element. Let P(A)P(A) be the set of extremal elements of D(A)D(A). Then (Algebra, Chapter VI, § 1, no. 13, Theorem 2) P(A)P(A) is a basis of the Z\mathbf{Z}-module D(A)D(A) and the positive elements of D(A)D(A) are the linear combinations with positive integer coefficients of the elements of P(A)P(A).

Thus, for x∈K∗x \in K^*, rational integers vP(x)v_P(x) are defined (for P∈P(A)P \in P(A)) by writing:

div(x)=∑P∈P(A)vP(x)⋅P. \text{div}(x) = \sum_{P \in P(A)} v_P(x) \cdot P.

We also write vP(0)=+∞v_P(0) = +\infty.

From the relations

div(xy)=div(x)+div(y) \text{div}(xy) = \text{div}(x) + \text{div}(y)

and

div(x+y)≥inf⁡(div(x),div(y)), \text{div}(x + y) \geq \inf(\text{div}(x), \text{div}(y)),

for x,yx, y and x+yx + y in K∗K^*, we deduce that the vPv_P are discrete valuations on KK. In order that x∈Ax \in A, it is necessary and sufficient that div(x)≥0\text{div}(x) \geq 0, that is that vP(x)≥0v_P(x) \geq 0 for all P∈P(A)P \in P(A). Thus the vPv_P satisfy conditions (AK1_1) and (AK11_{11}) and obviously also (AKIII_{III}).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.