Bourbaki

Theorem 1

Tag 04YT, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04YT].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains

Let AA be an integral domain. For the monoid D(A)D(A) of divisors of AA to be a group, it is necessary and sufficient that AA be completely integrally closed.

Suppose that D(A)D(A) is a group. Let x∈Kx \in K; suppose that A[x]A[x] is contained in a finitely generated sub-AA-module of KK. Then we have seen (no. 1) that a=A[x]a = A[x] is an element of I(A)I(A). Then xa⊂axa \subset a and hence div⁡(x)+div⁡a≥div⁡a\operatorname{div}(x) + \operatorname{div} a \geq \operatorname{div} a. Since D(A)D(A) is an ordered group, we conclude that div⁡(x)≥0\operatorname{div}(x) \geq 0, whence x∈Ax \in A. Thus AA is completely integrally closed (Chapter V, § 1, no. 4, Definition 5).

Conversely, suppose that AA is completely integrally closed. Let aa be a divisorial ideal. We shall show that div⁡a+div⁡(A:a)=0\operatorname{div} a + \operatorname{div}(A : a) = 0, which will prove that D(A)D(A) is a group. As a(A:a)⊂Aa(A : a) \subset A, it suffices (no. 1) to verify that every fractional principal ideal Ax−1Ax^{-1} which contains a(A:a)a(A : a) also contains AA. Now, for y∈K∗y \in K^*, the relation Ay⊃aAy \supset a implies y−1∈A:ay^{-1} \in A : a, whence y−1a⊂a(A:a)⊂Ax−1y^{-1}a \subset a(A : a) \subset Ax^{-1} and hence xa⊂Ayxa \subset Ay. As aa is divisorial, we deduce that xa⊂axa \subset a, whence xna⊂ax^n a \subset a for all n∈Nn \in \mathbf{N}. There exist elements x0,x1x_0, x_1 of K∗K^* such that Ax0⊂a⊂Ax1Ax_0 \subset a \subset Ax_1; therefore xnx0∈Ax1x^n x_0 \in Ax_1, whence xn∈Ax1x0−1x^n \in Ax_1 x_0^{-1}. As AA is completely integrally closed, x∈Ax \in A, that is Ax−1⊃AAx^{-1} \supset A, which completes the proof.

Note that, if AA is completely integrally closed (and even Noetherian), a divisorial ideal of AA is not necessarily invertible, in other words, in general J(A)≠D(A)J(A) \neq D(A) (Exercise 2 and § 3, no. 2, Proposition 1).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.