Bourbaki

Theorem 3

Tag 04Z9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04Z9].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains

Let A\mathbf{A} be a Krull domain and p\mathfrak{p} an integral ideal of A\mathbf{A}. For p\mathfrak{p} to be the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor, it is necessary and sufficient that p\mathfrak{p} be a prime ideal of height 1.

If p\mathfrak{p} is the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor, we know (no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6) that p\mathfrak{p} is prime and that Ap\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p} is a discrete valuation ring; as Ap\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p} has no prime ideals other than (0)(0) and pAp\mathfrak{p}\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p}, (0)(0) and p\mathfrak{p} are the only prime ideals of A\mathbf{A} contained in p\mathfrak{p} (Chapter II, § 3, no. 1, Proposition 3); hence p\mathfrak{p} is of height 1. Conversely, we shall show first that every prime ideal p≠(0)\mathfrak{p} \neq (0) of A\mathbf{A} contains a divisorial prime ideal q\mathfrak{q} corresponding to an extremal divisor: for, as Ap≠K\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p} \neq K, Ap\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p} is the intersection of a non-empty family (At)(\mathbf{A}_t) of essential valuation rings (no. 4, Proposition 6); each At\mathbf{A}_t is of the form Aqt\mathbf{A}_{\mathfrak{q}_t} (no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6) and from Ap⊂Aqt\mathbf{A}_\mathfrak{p} \subset \mathbf{A}_{\mathfrak{q}_t} we deduce that qt⊂p\mathfrak{q}_t \subset \mathfrak{p}. Thus, if p\mathfrak{p} is of height 1, then p=q\mathfrak{p} = \mathfrak{q}, which shows that p\mathfrak{p} is the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.