Theorem 3
Tag 04Z9, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 04Z9].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 1. Krull domains
Let be a Krull domain and an integral ideal of . For to be the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor, it is necessary and sufficient that be a prime ideal of height 1.
If is the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor, we know (no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6) that is prime and that is a discrete valuation ring; as has no prime ideals other than and , and are the only prime ideals of contained in (Chapter II, § 3, no. 1, Proposition 3); hence is of height 1. Conversely, we shall show first that every prime ideal of contains a divisorial prime ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor: for, as , is the intersection of a non-empty family of essential valuation rings (no. 4, Proposition 6); each is of the form (no. 4, Corollary 1 to Proposition 6) and from we deduce that . Thus, if is of height 1, then , which shows that is the divisorial ideal corresponding to an extremal divisor.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.