Bourbaki

Proposition 3

Tag 047W, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 047W].

Commutative Algebra, chapter II, § 3. Local rings. Passage from the local to the global

Let AA be a ring, pp a prime ideal of AA and S=A−pS = A - p. For every ideal b′b' of ApA_p distinct from ApA_p, let bb be the ideal (iAS)−1(b′)(i_A^S)^{-1}(b') of AA so that b′=bApb' = bA_p.

(i) Let ff be the canonical homomorphism A→A/bA \to A/b. The homomorphism from AA, to (A/b)p/b(A/b)_{p/b} canonically associated with ff (§2§ 2, no. 1, Proposition 2) is surjective and its kernel is b′b', which defines, by taking quotients, a canonical isomorphism of Ap/b′A_p/b' onto (A/b)p/b(A/b)_{p/b}.

(ii) The mapping b′→b=(iAS)−1(b′)b' \to b = (i_A^S)^{-1}(b'), restricted to the set of prime ideals of ApA_p, is an isomorphism (with respect to inclusion) of this set onto the set of prime ideals of AA contained in pp. If b′b' is prime in ApA_p, there exists an isomorphism of the ring AbA_b onto the ring (Ap)b′(A_p)_{b'}, which maps a/sa/s to (a/1)/(s/1)(a/1)/(s/1) for all a∈A,s∈A−ba \in A, s \in A - b.

This is just a particular case of §2§ 2, no. 5, Proposition 11.

Remarks (3) If aa is an ideal of AA not contained in pp, then aAp=AaA_p = A, and (A/a)p=0(A/a)_p = 0 (§2§ 2, no. 5, Remark). (4) Let A,BA, B be two rings, ρ:A→B\rho : A \to B a homomorphism, qq a prime ideal of BB and pp the prime ideal ρ−1(q)\rho^{-1}(q) of AA. As ρ(A−p)⊂B−q\rho(A - p) \subset B - q, a canonical homomorphism ρq:A→Bq\rho_q : A \to B_q is derived from ρ\rho (§2§ 2, no. 1, Proposition 2) and it is immediate that ρq(pAp)⊂qBq\rho_q(pA_p) \subset qB_q, hence ρ\rho is a local homomorphism.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.