Bourbaki

Proposition 1

Tag 050O, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 050O].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 2. Dedekind domains

A semi-local Dedekind domain is a principal ideal domain.

Let AA be a semi-local Dedekind domain, KK its field of fractions, p1,…,pnp_1, \ldots, p_n its maximal ideals and v1,…,vv_1, \ldots, v, the corresponding essential valuations; these are the only essential valuations of AA. Let aa be a non-zero integral ideal of AA. Since it is divisorial, there exists (§1§ 1, no. 4, Proposition 5) integers q1,…,qnq_1, \ldots, q_n such that aa is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that vi(x)≥qiv_i(x) \geq q_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n. Let x0x_0 be an element of KK such that vi(x0)=qiv_i(x_0) = q_i for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n (Chapter VI, §7§ 7, no. 2, Corollary 1 to Theorem 1). Then aa is the set of x∈Kx \in K such that vi(xx0−1)≥0v_i(xx_0^{-1}) \geq 0 for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n. Thus a=Ax0a = Ax_0.

If AA is a Dedekind domain, it has been seen, in the proof of Theorem 1, that the group D(A) of divisors of A is identified with the group I(A) of fractional ideals a≠(0)a \neq (0) (as A is Noetherian, every non-zero fractional ideal is finitely generated). The divisor class group C(A) of A (§1§ 1, no. 2) is then identified with the group of classes of ideals ≠0\neq 0 of A (defined in Chapter II, §5§ 5, no. 7).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.