Bourbaki

Lemma 4

Tag 0547, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0547].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let W be a vector space of finite rank over L and let R be a lattice of W with respect to B. Then, for all p∈P(A)p \in P(A), (R[A])p=⋂p/pRp(R_{[A]})_p = \bigcap_{\mathfrak{p}/p} R_{\mathfrak{p}}.

If S=A−pS = A - p, the prime ideals of the ring S−1BS^{-1}B are generated by the prime ideals of B not meeting S, in other words the ideals Pi\mathfrak{P}_i (1≤i≤m1 \leq i \leq m) lying above p and the ideal (0); this shows that S−1BS^{-1}B is a semi-local ring whose maximal ideals are the m, =Pi(S−1B)= \mathfrak{P}_i(S^{-1}B) for 1≤i≤m1 \leq i \leq m; moreover the local ring (S−1B)Pi(S^{-1}B)_{\mathfrak{P}_i} is isomorphic to BpiB_{\mathfrak{p}_i} (Chapter 11, § 2, no. 5, Proposition 11) and hence is a discrete valuation ring. The ring S−1BS^{-1}B is therefore a Dedekind domain (§ 2, no. 2, Theorem 1 (f)) and, as it is semi-local, it is a principal ideal domain (§ 2, no. 2, Proposition 1). This being so, (R[A])p(R_{[A]})_p is equal to S−1RS^{-1}R considered as an A,-module; by the above, S−1RS^{-1}R is a free lattice of W with respect to S−1BS^{-1}B and Theorem 2 of no. 2 may therefore be applied to it, giving S−1R=⋂i(S−1R)miS^{-1}R = \bigcap_i (S^{-1}R)_{m_i}: but (S−1R)mi=Rpi(S^{-1}R)_{m_i} = R_{\mathfrak{p}_i}, which proves the lemma.

Returning to the proof of Proposition 19, by Lemma 4,

⋂p∈P(B)Rp=⋂p∈P(A)(R[A])p \bigcap_{\mathfrak{p} \in P(B)} R_{\mathfrak{p}} = \bigcap_{p \in P(A)} (R_{[A]})_p

and the conclusion follows from no. 2, Theorem 2.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.