Bourbaki

Theorem 2

Tag 0539, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0539].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

If MM is a lattice of VV, the following conditions are equivalent: (a) MM is reflexive. (b) M=⋂p∈PMpM = \bigcap_{p \in P} M_p. (c) Ass⁡(V/M)⊂P\operatorname{Ass}(V/M) \subset P.

The equivalence of (a) and (b) follows from the Corollary to Theorem 1. If (b) holds, V/MV/M is canonically identified with a sub-AA-module of the product ∏p∈P(V/Mp)\prod_{p \in P} (V/M_p); but in fact, it is contained in the direct sum ⨁p∈P(V/Mp)\bigoplus_{p \in P} (V/M_p): for if L⊂ML \subset M is a free lattice and (ei)1≤i≤n(e_i)_{1 \leq i \leq n} a basis of LL, each of the coordinates xix_i of a point x∈Vx \in V with respect to (ei)(e_i) belongs to AA, except for a finite number of values of p∈Pp \in P. The relation V/M⊂⨁p∈P(V/Mp)V/M \subset \bigoplus_{p \in P} (V/M_p) then implies:

Ass⁡(V/M)⊂⋂p∈PAss⁡(V/Mp). \operatorname{Ass}(V/M) \subset \bigcap_{p \in P} \operatorname{Ass}(V/M_p).

As V/MpV/M_p is an ApA_p-module, an element of A−pA - p cannot annihilate an element ≠0\neq 0 of V/MpV/M_p, since the elements of A−pA - p are invertible in AA; the elements of Ass⁡(V/Mp)\operatorname{Ass}(V/M_p) are therefore contained in pp and are ≠0\neq 0, since V/MpV/M_p is a torsion AA-module; as pp is of height 1, necessarily Ass⁡(V/Mp)={p}\operatorname{Ass}(V/M_p) = \{ p \} if V/Mp≠(0)V/M_p \neq (0) and Ass⁡(V/Mp)=∅\operatorname{Ass}(V/M_p) = \varnothing if V/Mp=(0)V/M_p = (0); hence Ass⁡(V/M)⊂P\operatorname{Ass}(V/M) \subset P.

Finally, if condition (c) holds, then

Ass⁡(M∗∗/M)⊂Ass⁡(V/M)⊂P. \operatorname{Ass}(M^{**}/M) \subset \operatorname{Ass}(V/M) \subset P.

On the other hand, if p∈Pp \in P, then it has been seen in the proof of the Corollary to Theorem 1 that Mp∗∗=MpM_p^{**} = M_p, whence p∉Ass⁡(M∗∗/M)p \notin \operatorname{Ass}(M^{**}/M) (Chapter IV, §1§ 1, no. 3, Corollary 1 to Proposition 7). We conclude that Ass(M/M) = ∅, whence M = M (Chapter IV, § 1, no. 1, Corollary 1 to Proposition 2).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.