Bourbaki

Proposition 8

Tag 053D, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 053D].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let RR and SS be two commutative rings, p:R→Sp : R \to S a ring homomorphism and MM a finitely generated RR-module. Suppose that RR is Noetherian and that SS is a flat RR-module. Then, if MM is reflexive, so is the SS-module M(S)=M⊗RSM_{(S)} = M \otimes_R S. We know (Chapter I, § 2, no. 10, Proposition 11) that there exists a canonical isomorphism ωM:(M∗)(S)→(M(S))∗\omega_M : (M^*)_{(S)} \to (M_{(S)})^*, such that

⟨x⊗1,ωM(x∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x,x∗⟩) \langle x \otimes 1, \omega_M(x^* \otimes 1) \rangle = \rho(\langle x, x^* \rangle)

€or x \in M, x^* \in M^*. As M is a quotient of a finitely generated free R-module L, M* is isomorphic to a sub-R-module of the dual L* and L* is free and finitely generated; since R\mathbf{R} is Noetherian, M* is therefore also a finitely generated R-module, whence an isomorphism ωM∗:(M∗∗)(S)→((M∗)(S))∗\omega_{M^*}: (M^{**})_{(S)} \to ((M^*)_{(S)})^* such that

⟨x∗⊗1,ωM∗(x∗∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,x∗∗⟩) \langle x^* \otimes 1, \omega_{M^*}(x^{**} \otimes 1) \rangle = \rho(\langle x^*, x^{**} \rangle)

for x∗∈Mx^* \in M and x∗∗∈M∗∗x^{**} \in M^{**}. On the other hand, there is an isomorphism tωM:(M(S))∗∗→((M∗)(S))∗^t\omega_M: (M_{(S)})^{**} \to ((M^*)_{(S)})^*, whence by composition a canonical isomorphism:

ϕ=(tωM−1)∘(ωM∗):(M∗∗)(S)→(M(S))∗∗ \phi = (t\omega_M^{-1}) \circ (\omega_{M^*}): (M^{**})_{(S)} \to (M_{(S)})^{**}

such that, in the above notation:

(1)

⟨ωM(x∗⊗1),ϕ(x∗∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,x∗∗⟩). \langle \omega_M(x^* \otimes 1), \phi(x^{**} \otimes 1) \rangle = \rho(\langle x^*, x^{**} \rangle).

We consider now the canonical homomorphism cM:M→M∗∗c_M: M \to M^{**} and show that the composite homomorphism :

(2)

ψ:M(S)→cM⊗1(M∗∗)(S)⟶(M(S))∗∗ \psi: M_{(S)} \xrightarrow{c_M \otimes 1} (M^{**})_{(S)} \longrightarrow (M_{(S)})^{**}

is just the canonical homomorphism cM(S)c_{M_{(S)}}. This follows immediately from (1) which gives the relations :

⟨ωM(x∗⊗1),ψ(x⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,cM(x)⟩) \langle \omega_M(x^* \otimes 1), \psi(x \otimes 1) \rangle = \rho(\langle x^*, c_M(x) \rangle)
=ρ(⟨x,x∗⟩)=⟨x⊗1,ωM(x∗⊗1)⟩ = \rho(\langle x, x^* \rangle) = \langle x \otimes 1, \omega_M(x^* \otimes 1) \rangle

and from the fact that the elements ωM(x∗⊗1)\omega_M(x^* \otimes 1) generate (M(S))∗(M_{(S)})^*. This being so, the hypothesis that M is reflexive means that cMc_M is bijective, hence so is cM⊗1c_M \otimes 1 and therefore ψ=cM(S)\psi = c_{M_{(S)}} is bijective, which shows the proposition.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.