Let R and S be two commutative rings, p:R→S a ring homomorphism and M a finitely generated R-module. Suppose that R is Noetherian and that S is a flat R-module. Then, if M is reflexive, so is the S-module M(S)=M⊗RS. We know (Chapter I, § 2, no. 10, Proposition 11) that there exists a canonical isomorphism ωM:(M∗)(S)→(M(S))∗, such that
⟨x⊗1,ωM(x∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x,x∗⟩)
€or x \in M, x^* \in M^*. As M is a quotient of a finitely generated free R-module L, M* is isomorphic to a sub-R-module of the dual L* and L* is free and finitely generated; since R is Noetherian, M* is therefore also a finitely generated R-module, whence an isomorphism ωM∗:(M∗∗)(S)→((M∗)(S))∗ such that
⟨x∗⊗1,ωM∗(x∗∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,x∗∗⟩)
for x∗∈M and x∗∗∈M∗∗. On the other hand, there is an isomorphism tωM:(M(S))∗∗→((M∗)(S))∗, whence by composition a canonical isomorphism:
ϕ=(tωM−1)∘(ωM∗):(M∗∗)(S)→(M(S))∗∗
such that, in the above notation:
(1)
⟨ωM(x∗⊗1),ϕ(x∗∗⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,x∗∗⟩).
We consider now the canonical homomorphism cM:M→M∗∗ and show that the composite homomorphism :
(2)
ψ:M(S)cM⊗1(M∗∗)(S)⟶(M(S))∗∗
is just the canonical homomorphism cM(S). This follows immediately from (1) which gives the relations :
⟨ωM(x∗⊗1),ψ(x⊗1)⟩=ρ(⟨x∗,cM(x)⟩)
=ρ(⟨x,x∗⟩)=⟨x⊗1,ωM(x∗⊗1)⟩
and from the fact that the elements ωM(x∗⊗1) generate (M(S))∗. This being so, the hypothesis that M is reflexive means that cM is bijective, hence so is cM⊗1 and therefore ψ=cM(S) is bijective, which shows the proposition.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.