Bourbaki

Proposition 17

Tag 0544, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 0544].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let G be a commutative group written additively and ϕ\phi a mapping from the set F(A)F(A) of classes of finitely generated A-modules to G; for every finitely generated A-module M we also write, by an abuse of language, ϕ(M)=ϕ(cl(M))\phi(M) = \phi(\mathrm{cl}(M)). Suppose the following conditions are satisfied: (1) If 0→M1→M2→M3→00 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0 is an exact sequence of finitely generated A-modules, then ϕ(M2)=ϕ(M1)+ϕ(M3)\phi(M_2) = \phi(M_1) + \phi(M_3). (2) If T is pseudo-zero, then ϕ(T)=0\phi(T) = 0. Then there exists a unique homomorphism θ:Z×C→G\theta : Z \times C \to G such that ϕ=8∘y\phi = 8 \circ y.

By virtue of Proposition 16 (iv), every element of Z×CZ \times C is of the form (r(M),c(M))(r(M), c(M)) for some suitable finitely generated A-module M; whence the uniqueness of θ\theta. We apply Proposition 11 of no. 5 to the restriction of −ϕ-\phi to T(A)T(A): then there exists a homomorphism θ0:D→G\theta_0 : D \to G such that

−ϕ(T)=θ0(χ(T)) -\phi(T) = \theta_0(\chi(T))

for every finitely generated torsion A-module T. Let x be a non-zero element of A; applying property (1) to the exact sequence:

0⟶A→hxA⟶A/xA⟶0 0 \longrightarrow A \xrightarrow{h_x} A \longrightarrow A/xA \longrightarrow 0

where hxh_x is multiplication by x, we obtain ϕ(A/xA)=0\phi(A/xA) = 0, whence θ0(div(x))=0\theta_0(\mathrm{div}(x)) = 0. Taking quotients, θ0\theta_0 therefore defines a homomorphism θ1:C→G\theta_1 : C \to G and ϕ(T)=θ1(c(T))\phi(T) = \theta_1(c(T)) for every torsion A-module T. We show now that the homomorphism θ\theta defined by θ(n,z)=n.ϕ(A)+θ1(z)\theta(n, z) = n.\phi(A) + \theta_1(z) solves the problem. For this, we write ϕ′(M)=ϕ(M)−θ(γ(M))\phi'(M) = \phi(M) - \theta(\gamma(M)) for every finitely generated A-module M; clearly condition (1) is still satisfied if ϕ\phi is replaced by ϕ′\phi'. Moreover, ϕ′(M)=0\phi'(M) = 0 when M is a torsion module or a free module; but as for every finitely generated A-module M, there exists a free sub-module L of M such that M/L is a torsion module (Proposition 15), property (1) shows that ϕ′(M)=0\phi'(M) = 0 for every finitely generated A-module M.

\* In the language of Abelian categories, Proposition 17 shows that Z×C(A)\mathbf{Z} \times C(A) is canonically isomorphic to the Grothendieck group of the quotient category F/F′\mathscr{F}/\mathscr{F}', where F\mathscr{F} is the category of finitely generated A-modules and F′\mathscr{F}' the full sub-category of F\mathscr{F} consisting of the pseudo-zero modules. \*

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.