Bourbaki

Lemma 6

Tag 054B, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 054B].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Let RR be a commutative ring and pip_i (1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n) distinct prime ideals of RR.

(i) For 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n, let HiH_i be a subset of R/piR/p_i satisfying the following condition: there exists no element αi∈R/pi\alpha_i \in R/p_i such that αi+Hi\alpha_i + H_i contains an ideal ≠0\neq 0 of R/piR/p_i. Then there exists a∈Ra \in R such that, for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n, the canonical image of aa in R/piR/p_i does not belong to HiH_i.

(ii) If Card⁡(Hi)<Card⁡(R/pi)\operatorname{Card}(H_i) < \operatorname{Card}(R/p_i), the HiH_i satisfy the condition in (i).

(i) We argue by induction on nn, the case n=0n = 0 being trivial. Therefore let n≥1n \geq 1. We may make a permutation on the indices ii and may assume that p1p_1 is minimal among the pip_i and therefore, for 2≤i≤n2 \leq i \leq n, there exists ci∈pic_i \in p_i such that ci∉p1c_i \notin p_1. By the induction hypothesis there exists b∈Rb \in R such that the canonical image of bb in R/piR/p_i does not belong to HiH_i for 2≤i≤n2 \leq i \leq n. For all x∈Rx \in R we write ai=b+xc2c3…cna_i = b + x c_2 c_3 \ldots c_n; as ci∈pic_i \in p_i, obviously ai≡b(modpi)a_i \equiv b \pmod{p_i} for 2≤i≤n2 \leq i \leq n. It therefore suffices to prove that there exists x∈Rx \in \mathbf{R} such that the canonical image of aia_i in R/p1\mathbf{R}/p_1 does not belong to H1H_1. Now, the set of canonical images of the aia_i in R/p1\mathbf{R}/p_1, where xx runs through R\mathbf{R}, is just β+c\beta + c, where β\beta is the canonical image of bb and cc the ideal of R/p1\mathbf{R}/p_1 generated by the canonical image of c2c3…cnc_2 c_3 \ldots c_n; by virtue of the choice of the cic_i, c≠0c \neq 0 since R/p1\mathbf{R}/p_1 is an integral domain and the hypothesis on H1H_1 implies the existence of an xx which solves the problem.

(ii) As R/pi\mathbf{R}/p_i is an integral domain, every ideal ≠0\neq 0 of R/pi\mathbf{R}/p_i has cardinal equal to that of R/pi\mathbf{R}/p_i and the same is true of any translation of an ideal by an element of R/pi\mathbf{R}/p_i, whence the conclusion.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.