Lemma 6
Tag 054B, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 054B].
Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains
Let be a commutative ring and () distinct prime ideals of .
(i) For , let be a subset of satisfying the following condition: there exists no element such that contains an ideal of . Then there exists such that, for , the canonical image of in does not belong to .
(ii) If , the satisfy the condition in (i).
(i) We argue by induction on , the case being trivial. Therefore let . We may make a permutation on the indices and may assume that is minimal among the and therefore, for , there exists such that . By the induction hypothesis there exists such that the canonical image of in does not belong to for . For all we write ; as , obviously for . It therefore suffices to prove that there exists such that the canonical image of in does not belong to . Now, the set of canonical images of the in , where runs through , is just , where is the canonical image of and the ideal of generated by the canonical image of ; by virtue of the choice of the , since is an integral domain and the hypothesis on implies the existence of an which solves the problem.
(ii) As is an integral domain, every ideal of has cardinal equal to that of and the same is true of any translation of an ideal by an element of , whence the conclusion.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Cites
Nothing.