Bourbaki

Lemma 8

Tag 054E, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 054E].

Commutative Algebra, chapter VII, § 4. Modules over integrally closed Noetherian domains

Suppose that the rank nn of MM is ⩾2\geqslant 2; then there exists an element x≠0x \neq 0 of MM such that M/AxM/Ax is torsion-free.

Let y≠0y \neq 0 be an element of MM. By Lemma 7, the set YY of p∈Pp \in P such that y(p)=0y(p) = 0 is finite. If Y=∅Y = \varnothing, it follows from Lemma 7, applied to the sequence (xi)(x_i) consisting of the single element yy, that M/AyM/Ay is torsion-free. Suppose therefore that Y#@Y \# @ and write S=⋂p∈Y(A−p)S = \bigcap_{p \in Y} (A - p); we know (no. 4, Lemma 2) that S−1AS^{-1}A is a semi-local principal ideal domain whose maximal ideals are the pS−1ApS^{-1}A, where p∈Yp \in Y, the corresponding local rings being the ApA_p. Therefore

S−1A/pS−1A=k(p), S^{-1}A/pS^{-1}A = k(p),
whence
S−1M/pS−1M=(M/pM)⊗AS−1A=M⊗A((A/p)⊗AS−1A)=M⊗Ak(p)=M(p) S^{-1}M/pS^{-1}M = (M/pM) \otimes_A S^{-1}A = M \otimes_A ((A/p) \otimes_A S^{-1}A) = M \otimes_A k(p) = M(p)
for all p∈Yp \in Y. By Chapter II, § 1, no. 2, Proposition 6, there exists an element z/s∈S−1Mz/s \in S^{-1}M (z∈M,s∈Sz \in M, s \in S) whose canonical images in the M(p)M(p) for p∈Yp \in Y are all ≠0\neq 0. By definition of SS therefore z(p)≠0z(p) \neq 0 for all p∈Yp \in Y. We may further assume that yy and zz are linearly independent over KK. For in the opposite case consider an element t∈Mt \in M which is linearly independent of yy (such exists since n⩾2n \geqslant 2); on the other hand take an element a≠0a \neq 0 belonging to ⋂p∈Yp\bigcap_{p \in Y} p (which is not reduced to 0 since AA is an integral domain) and write z′=z+atz' = z + at: clearly yy and z′z' are linearly independent over KK and z′(p)=z(p)≠0z'(p) = z(p) \neq 0 for all p∈Yp \in Y.

Supposing therefore that yy and zz are linearly independent over KK, let ZZ be the set of p∈P−Yp \in P - Y such that y(p)y(p) and z(p)z(p) are linearly independent over k(p)k(p); it follows from Lemma 7 that this set is finite. For all p∈Zp \in Z, we may therefore write z(p)=λ(p)y(p)z(p) = \lambda(p)y(p) where λ(p)∈k(p)\lambda(p) \in k(p). Now, Card⁡(A/p)>2\operatorname{Card}(A/p) > 2 for all p∈Pp \in P; it therefore follows from Lemma 6 that there exists b∈Ab \in A such that, for all p∈Zp \in Z, the canonical image of bb in A/pA/p is distinct from λ(p)\lambda(p). We now show that the element x=z−byx = z - by solves the problem; it suffices (by virtue of Lemma 7 applied with m=1m = 1) to verify that x(p)≠0x(p) \neq 0 for all p∈Pp \in P. Now:

— if p∈Yp \in Y, then x(p)≠0x(p) \neq 0 by construction; — if p∈Zp \in Z, then x(p)=μpy(p)x(p) = \mu_p y(p) where μp≠0\mu_p \neq 0 by virtue of the choice of bb and hence x(p)≠0x(p) \neq 0 since y(p)#0y(p) \# 0; — if p∈P−(Y∪Z)p \in P - (Y \cup Z), y(p)y(p) and z(p)z(p) are linearly independent and hence x(p)≠0x(p) \neq 0.

Having established these lemmas, we pass to the proof of Theorem 6. We argue by induction on nn, the case n≤1n \leq 1 being trivial since MM itself is then isomorphic to an ideal of AA. Suppose therefore that n≥2n \geq 2; by virtue of Lemma 8 there exists a free submodule L0L_0 of MM of rank 1 such that M/L0M/L_0 is torsion-free; M/L0M/L_0 is therefore of rank n−1n - 1. By the induction hypothesis there exists a free submodule LL, of M/L0M/L_0 such that (M/L0)/L1(M/L_0)/L_1 is isomorphic to an ideal of AA. Let LL be the inverse image of L1L_1 in MM; L/L0L/L_0 is isomorphic to L1L_1 and, since L1L_1 is free, LL is isomorphic to L0⊕L1L_0 \oplus L_1 (Algebra, Chapter II, § 1, no. 11, Proposition 21) and hence free; as M/LM/L is isomorphic to (M/L0)/L1(M/L_0)/L_1, the theorem has been shown.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed volume. Not translated.