Definition 2
Tag 05B3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05B3].
Algebra, chapter I, § 5. Groups operating on a set
Let M be a monoid and E and E' M-sets. A mapping f of E into E' such that, for all and all , is called an M-set homomorphism (or M-morphism, or mapping compatible with the operations of M).
The identity mapping of an M-set is an M-morphism. The composition of two M-morphisms is an M-morphism. For a mapping of one M-set into another to be an isomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that it be a bijective M-morphism and the inverse mapping is then an M-morphism.
Let be a family of M-sets and let E be the product set of . The monoid M operates on E by and E, with this action, is an M-set; let E' be an M-set; a mapping f of E' into E is an M-morphism if and only if is an M-morphism of E' into for all .
Let E be an M-set and F a stable subset of E under the action of M; with the induced law, F is an M-set and the canonical injection is an M-morphism.
Let E be an M-set and R an equivalence relation on E compatible with the action of M; the quotient with the quotient action is an M-set and the canonical mapping is an M-morphism.
Let be a monoid homomorphism, E an M-set and E' an -set. A mapping f of E into E' such that, for all and ,
is called a -morphism of E into E' (cf. 3, no. 1).
Extension of a law of operation. Given (for example) three sets , permutations of respectively and an echelon F on the base sets (Set Theory, IV, 1, no. 1), we can define, proceeding step by step on the construction of the echelon F, a permutation of F called the canonical extension of to F (Set Theory, IV, 1, no. 2); we shall denote it by .
Then let G be a group and a homomorphism of G into the symmetric group of (), in other words an operation of G on . The mapping is a homomorphism of G into , in other words an operation of G on F, called the extension of to F. Let P be a subset of F such that, for all , ; let be the restriction of to
P; then the mapping is an operation of G on P, also called the extension of to P.
For example, let K and L be two echelons on ; take F to be the set of subsets of and P to be the set of mappings of K into L, identified with their graphs. If and , is the mapping of K into L.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Cited by
Nothing.