Bourbaki

Definition 2

Tag 05B3, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05B3].

Algebra, chapter I, § 5. Groups operating on a set

Let M be a monoid and E and E' M-sets. A mapping f of E into E' such that, for all x∈Ex \in E and all α∈M\alpha \in M, f(α.x)=α.f(x)f(\alpha.x) = \alpha.f(x) is called an M-set homomorphism (or M-morphism, or mapping compatible with the operations of M).

The identity mapping of an M-set is an M-morphism. The composition of two M-morphisms is an M-morphism. For a mapping of one M-set into another to be an isomorphism, it is necessary and sufficient that it be a bijective M-morphism and the inverse mapping is then an M-morphism.

Let (Ei)i∈I(E_i)_{i \in I} be a family of M-sets and let E be the product set of EiE_i. The monoid M operates on E by α.(xi)i∈I=(α.xi)i∈I\alpha.(x_i)_{i \in I} = (\alpha.x_i)_{i \in I} and E, with this action, is an M-set; let E' be an M-set; a mapping f of E' into E is an M-morphism if and only if pri∘fpr_i \circ f is an M-morphism of E' into EiE_i for all i∈Ii \in I.

Let E be an M-set and F a stable subset of E under the action of M; with the induced law, F is an M-set and the canonical injection F→EF \to E is an M-morphism.

Let E be an M-set and R an equivalence relation on E compatible with the action of M; the quotient E/RE/R with the quotient action is an M-set and the canonical mapping E→E/RE \to E/R is an M-morphism.

Let ϕ:M→M′\phi : M \to M' be a monoid homomorphism, E an M-set and E' an M′M'-set. A mapping f of E into E' such that, for all x∈Ex \in E and α∈M\alpha \in M,

f(α.x)=ϕ(α).f(x) f(\alpha.x) = \phi(\alpha).f(x)

is called a ϕ\phi-morphism of E into E' (cf. §\S 3, no. 1).

Extension of a law of operation. Given (for example) three sets F1,F2,F3F_1, F_2, F_3, permutations f1,f2,f3f_1, f_2, f_3 of F1,F2,F3F_1, F_2, F_3 respectively and an echelon F on the base sets F1,F2,F3F_1, F_2, F_3 (Set Theory, IV, §\S 1, no. 1), we can define, proceeding step by step on the construction of the echelon F, a permutation of F called the canonical extension of f1,f2,f3f_1, f_2, f_3 to F (Set Theory, IV, §\S 1, no. 2); we shall denote it by ϕF(f1,f2,f3)\phi_F(f_1, f_2, f_3).

Then let G be a group and hih_i a homomorphism of G into the symmetric group of FiF_i (i=1,2,3i = 1, 2, 3), in other words an operation of G on FiF_i. The mapping x↦xF=ϕF(h1(x),h2(x),h3(x))x \mapsto x_F = \phi_F(h_1(x), h_2(x), h_3(x)) is a homomorphism of G into SF\mathfrak{S}_F, in other words an operation of G on F, called the extension of h1,h2,h3h_1, h_2, h_3 to F. Let P be a subset of F such that, for all x∈Gx \in G, xF(P)=Px_F(P) = P; let xPx_P be the restriction of xFx_F to

P; then the mapping x↦xPx \mapsto x_P is an operation of G on P, also called the extension of h1,h2,h3h_1, h_2, h_3 to P.

For example, let K and L be two echelons on F1,F2,F3F_1, F_2, F_3; take F to be the set of subsets of K×LK \times L and P to be the set of mappings of K into L, identified with their graphs. If w∈Pw \in P and x∈Gx \in G, xP(w)x_P(w) is the mapping k↦xL(w(xK−1(k)))k \mapsto x_L(w(x_K^{-1}(k))) of K into L.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.