Bourbaki

Proposition 2

Tag 05CS, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05CS].

Algebra, chapter I, § 6. Extensions, solvable groups, nilpotent groups

Let E:F→iE→pG\mathscr{E}: F \xrightarrow{i} E \xrightarrow{p} G be an extension of GG by FF. The following conditions are equivalent:

(i) E\mathscr{E} is a trivial extension; (ii) E\mathscr{E} has a retraction rr; (iii) E\mathscr{E} has a section ss such that s(G)s(G) is contained in the centralizer of i(F)i(F).

Clearly (i) implies (ii) and (iii). If (ii) holds, the mapping (r,p):E→F×G(r, p): E \to F \times G is a morphism of E\mathscr{E} into E0\mathscr{E}_0, whence (i). If (iii) holds, the homomorphism of F×GF \times G into EE corresponding to (i,s)(i, s) (§\S 4, no. 9, Proposition 12) is a morphism of E0\mathscr{E}_0 into E\mathscr{E}, whence (i).

It may be that an extension E:F→E→G\mathscr{E}: F \to E \to G is not trivial and yet the group EE is isomorphic to F×GF \times G (Exercise 6).

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.