Bourbaki

Lemma 1

Tag 05FM, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05FM].

Algebra, chapter I, § 7. Free monoids, free groups

Let i1,…,ini_1, \ldots, i_n be in II and pαp_\alpha in PiαP_{i_\alpha} for 1≤α≤n1 \leq \alpha \leq n. For all a∈Aa \in A there exists a′∈Aa' \in A and a sequence (pα′)1≤α≤n(p'_\alpha)_{1 \leq \alpha \leq n} with pα′∈Piαp'_\alpha \in P_{i_\alpha} such that

ϕi1(p1)…ϕin(pn)h(a)=h(a′)ϕi1(p1′)…ϕin(pn′). \phi_{i_1}(p_1) \ldots \phi_{i_n}(p_n)h(a) = h(a')\phi_{i_1}(p'_1) \ldots \phi_{i_n}(p'_n).
h(a)=ϕin(hin(a))h(a) = \phi_{i_n}(h_{i_n}(a)) and there exists an∈Aa_n \in A and pn′∈Pinp'_n \in P_{i_n} with
pn⋅hin(a)=hin(an)⋅pn′. p_n \cdot h_{i_n}(a) = h_{i_n}(a_n) \cdot p'_n.
It follows that ϕin(pn)h(a)=h(an)ϕin(pn′)\phi_{i_n}(p_n)h(a) = h(a_n)\phi_{i_n}(p'_n), whence
ϕi1(p1)…ϕin−1(pn−1)ϕin(pn)h(a)=ϕi1(p1)…ϕin−1(pn−1)h(an)ϕin(pn′); \phi_{i_1}(p_1) \ldots \phi_{i_{n-1}}(p_{n-1})\phi_{i_n}(p_n)h(a) = \phi_{i_1}(p_1) \ldots \phi_{i_{n-1}}(p_{n-1})h(a_n)\phi_{i_n}(p'_n);
the lemma follows from this by induction on nn.

(C) End of the proof:

Let x∈Mx \in M and let nn be the minimum of the lengths of decompositions of xx. We shall prove that every decomposition σ\sigma of xx of length nn is reduced. This will establish the existence of a reduced decomposition of xx; the uniqueness of the reduced decomposition then implies l(σ′)>l(σ)l(\sigma') > l(\sigma) for every decomposition σ′≠σ\sigma' \neq \sigma of xx.

The case n=0n = 0 being trivial, suppose n>0n > 0. Let

σ=(a;i1,…,in;p1,…,pn) \sigma = (a; i_1, \ldots, i_n; p_1, \ldots, p_n)
be a decomposition of xx of length nn. If there existed an integer α\alpha with 1≤α≤n1 \leq \alpha \leq n and pα=eiαp_\alpha = e_{i_\alpha}, the sequence
(a;i1,…,iα−1,iα+1,…,in;p1,…,pα−1,pα+1,…,pn) (a; i_1, \ldots, i_{\alpha-1}, i_{\alpha+1}, \ldots, i_n; p_1, \ldots, p_{\alpha-1}, p_{\alpha+1}, \ldots, p_n)

would be a decomposition of xx of length n−1n - 1, which is excluded. Suppose that there exists an integer α\alpha with 1≤α<n1 \leq \alpha < n and iα=iα+1i_{\alpha} = i_{\alpha + 1} and let

pαpα+1=hiα(a′)⋅pα′ p_{\alpha} p_{\alpha + 1} = h_{i_{\alpha}}(a') \cdot p'_{\alpha}
with a′∈Aa' \in \mathbf{A} and pα′∈Piαp'_{\alpha} \in P_{i_{\alpha}}; by Lemma 1 there exists elements a′′∈Aa'' \in \mathbf{A},
p1′∈Pi1,…,pα−1′∈Piα−1 p'_{1} \in P_{i_{1}}, \ldots, p'_{\alpha - 1} \in P_{i_{\alpha - 1}}
such that
ϕi1(p1)⋯ϕiα−1(pα−1)h(a′)=h(a′′)ϕi1(p1′)⋯ϕiα−1(pα−1′) \phi_{i_{1}}(p_{1}) \cdots \phi_{i_{\alpha - 1}}(p_{\alpha - 1}) h(a') = h(a'') \phi_{i_{1}}(p'_{1}) \cdots \phi_{i_{\alpha - 1}}(p'_{\alpha - 1})
and the sequence
(aa′′;i1,…,iα−1,iα,iα+2,…,in;p1′,…,pα−1′,pα′,pα+2,…,pn) (aa''; i_{1}, \ldots, i_{\alpha - 1}, i_{\alpha}, i_{\alpha + 2}, \ldots, i_{n}; p'_{1}, \ldots, p'_{\alpha - 1}, p'_{\alpha}, p_{\alpha + 2}, \ldots, p_{n})
is a decomposition of xx of length n−1n - 1, which is a contradiction.

We have thus proved that σ\sigma is reduced.

Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.

Cited by

Nothing.

Cites

Nothing.

Transcribed from the printed edition, 1998, Springer. Not translated.