Let i1,…,in be in I and pα in Piα for 1≤α≤n. For all a∈A there exists a′∈A and a sequence (pα′)1≤α≤n with pα′∈Piα such that
ϕi1(p1)…ϕin(pn)h(a)=h(a′)ϕi1(p1′)…ϕin(pn′). h(a)=ϕin(hin(a)) and there exists
an∈A and
pn′∈Pin with
pn⋅hin(a)=hin(an)⋅pn′. It follows that
ϕin(pn)h(a)=h(an)ϕin(pn′), whence
ϕi1(p1)…ϕin−1(pn−1)ϕin(pn)h(a)=ϕi1(p1)…ϕin−1(pn−1)h(an)ϕin(pn′); the lemma follows from this by induction on
n.
(C) End of the proof:
Let x∈M and let n be the minimum of the lengths of decompositions of x. We shall prove that every decomposition σ of x of length n is reduced. This will establish the existence of a reduced decomposition of x; the uniqueness of the reduced decomposition then implies l(σ′)>l(σ) for every decomposition σ′=σ of x.
The case n=0 being trivial, suppose n>0. Let
σ=(a;i1,…,in;p1,…,pn) be a decomposition of
x of length
n. If there existed an integer
α with
1≤α≤n and
pα=eiα, the sequence
(a;i1,…,iα−1,iα+1,…,in;p1,…,pα−1,pα+1,…,pn)
would be a decomposition of x of length n−1, which is excluded. Suppose that there exists an integer α with 1≤α<n and iα=iα+1 and let
pαpα+1=hiα(a′)⋅pα′ with
a′∈A and
pα′∈Piα; by Lemma 1 there exists elements
a′′∈A,
p1′∈Pi1,…,pα−1′∈Piα−1 such that
ϕi1(p1)⋯ϕiα−1(pα−1)h(a′)=h(a′′)ϕi1(p1′)⋯ϕiα−1(pα−1′) and the sequence
(aa′′;i1,…,iα−1,iα,iα+2,…,in;p1′,…,pα−1′,pα′,pα+2,…,pn) is a decomposition of
x of length
n−1, which is a contradiction.
We have thus proved that σ is reduced.
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.
Nothing.
Nothing.