Proposition 5
Tag 05HK, permanent. Cite it as [Bourbaki, Tag 05HK].
Algebra, chapter I, § 8. Rings
Let and be two rings, a homomorphism of into and the kernel of . (a) Let be a subring of . Then is a subring of containing . If is surjective, then and defines when passing to the quotient an isomorphism of onto . (b) Let be a left (resp. right, two-sided) ideal of . Then is a left (resp. right, two-sided) ideal of containing .
(c) *If is a two-sided ideal of , the composite mapping of the canonical morphism and defines, when passing to the quotient, an injective morphism of into . If is surjective, is an isomorphism of onto .
(d) *Suppose is surjective. Let be the set of subrings (resp. left ideals, right ideals, two-sided ideals) of containing . Let be the set of subrings (resp. left ideals, right ideals, two-sided ideals) of . The mappings and are inverse bijections of onto and onto .
(a) and (b) are obvious, except the last assertion of (a) which follows from no. 7, Theorem 3.
The composite morphism considered in (c) has kernel and hence is an injective morphism of into (§ 8, no. 7, Theorem 3). If is surjective, is surjective and hence is surjective.
Suppose is surjective. By the above, the mapping is a mapping of into . Clearly the mapping is a mapping of into . Then whence (d).
Bourbaki puts the proof directly after the statement, so what is above is the statement and its proof together.